'Lord of the Rings' rights win producer an easy £94m
Wednesday 31 August 2005
Variety reported yesterday that Mr Zaentz, who had nothing ultimately to do with Peter Jackson's wildly successful movie trilogy, had been paid a thumping $168m (£94m) by New Line Cinema as part of a settlement designed to ward off a full-blown jury trial, which would otherwise have started last month.
It was, the entertainment newspaper said, the biggest payday earned by a producer for a film or series of films he did not even produce.
The settlement, which may ultimately involve further compensation for Mr Zaentz because of a secondary dispute over royalty payment calculations, was the latest twist in an increasingly ugly battle over the spoils from The Lord of the Rings trilogy. It took almost $3bn in global box-office receipts and is still raking in profits, thanks to DVD sales and other secondary marketing opportunities.
New Line Cinema feels it is entitled to the lion's share of the profits because it took the biggest risk, committing to all three films ahead of time and putting $180m up front at a time when fantasy was as unfashionable a genre as light opera.
But that aggrieved many involved, including Peter Jackson, the director, and his producer-wife Fran Walsh. They have sued New Line claiming they have been short-changed on their share of revenue from home video, merchandising and video games related to the film.
Mr Zaentz is a revered figure in Hollywood, responsible for relatively few films although almost every one has been wildly successful, everything from One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest in 1976, to Amadeus (1984) and The English Patient (1995). His acquisition of J R R Tolkein's trilogy led to an unsuccessful cartoon version of the first of the three books in 1978, after which film industry believed the Rings cycle was nearly unfilmable.
The idea was revived in the mid-1990s, when Mr Jackson approached Miramax films for seed funds. But Miramax was forced to let go of the project after Disney, its parent company, said no because of the the anticipated high cost.
So Miramax stuck on legal stipulations and allowed it to be shopped around. Those stipulations have become the stuff of many of the lawsuits, including Mr Zaentz's. His name and that of Miramax are on the credits (and in the Oscar nominations) but they were not involved in production.
But quite how the $168m figure, almost enough to make the trilogy again, was reached remains unknown.
Katie Hopkins continues campaign to become Britain's most hated talking head with poorly timed Bob Crow tweet
Ukip and Nigel Farage on course for remarkable victory in European elections
No EU referendum under Labour: Ed Miliband to reveal that vote on membership is ‘unlikely’ in next Parliament if party wins power
Tony Benn was entirely ineffectual - and usually wrong
The rise of Ukip: Study warns Labour that Eurosceptic party's electoral base now 'more working class than any of the main parties'
Europeans have ‘got whiter’ due to natural selection in past 5,000 years, scientists say
- 1 Is your name now 'banned' in Saudi Arabia?
- 2 Gender-specific books demean all our children. So the Independent on Sunday will no longer review anything marketed to exclude either sex
- 3 Missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 Q&A by Simon Calder: How far could it have travelled? Who was responsible and what would their plans be? And how can a plane just vanish?
- 4 California man Christopher Viatafa surrenders to police after googling own name and discovering himself listed as ‘most wanted’
- 5 'Missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 plane found in Bermuda Triangle!' Viral Facebook links are profiting hackers
£50000 - £60000 per annum: Charter Selection: This well respected and exciting...
£40000 - £50000 per annum: Charter Selection: This exciting company and market...
£40000 - £60000 per annum + EXCELLENT SALARY: Austen Lloyd: Senior Private Cli...
£25,000 to £35,000: IT Connections Ltd: Signal Processing Engineer / Acoustics...