World

6° London Hi 11°C / Lo 5°C

Miss California stripped of tiara after all

By Guy Adams in Los Angeles

Donald Trump poses with Miss California USA, Carrie Prejean, following a news conference on 12 May announcing that Prejean would retain her title

REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

Donald Trump poses with Miss California USA, Carrie Prejean, following a news conference on 12 May announcing that Prejean would retain her title

A beauty queen whose opposition to gay marriage turned her into an overnight poster girl for America's conservative movement has been stripped of her hard-won tiara, after failing to properly discharge the onerous responsibilities of a reigning Miss California.

Carrie Prejean shot to global prominence after telling judges at the Miss USA pageant in April that "marriage should be between a man and a woman," but was fired on Wednesday for what Miss California officials described as repeated "contract violations."

Her sacking had nothing to do with a media feeding frenzy over recently-discovered topless photos of Prejean, or the revelation that she'd undergone breast enhancement surgery. Neither was it related to tabloid reports that, for all her grandstanding about traditional values, Prejean's mother, Francine, is a lesbian.

Instead, Donald Trump, the entrepreneur who owns the Miss USA organisation, told reporters that Miss Prejean had simply failed to do her job: refusing, to appear on Larry King's CNN show, or show up at several public events organised by the pageant's sponsors.

"I told Carrie she needed to get back to work and honor her contract," he said. "Unfortunately, it just doesn't look like it is going to happen? Carrie is a beautiful young woman and I wish her well as she pursues her other interests."

Miss Prejean, who will be replaced by her runner-up Tami Farrell, nonetheless claimed that her termination was politically motivated: "None of this would be happening right now if I had just said, 'Yeah, gays should get married," she said.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Kudos
[info]erdely_47 wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 05:38 pm (UTC)
for Miss California Carrie Prejean for standing up for her values. The Donald should have kept the crown for himself.
Re: Kudos
[info]loraelin wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 05:52 pm (UTC)
I would not chose to dignify bigoty with the title of 'values'.
Re: Kudos
[info]erdely_47 wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 06:19 pm (UTC)
Does your disagreement make her a bigot? I don't think so.
Re: Kudos
[info]aleuwhitewolf wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 07:20 pm (UTC)
It is bigotry. Her 'values' are basically "these group of people shouldn't have the same rights of other people". I thought in America it's unconstitutional to prevent freedoms to a certain group.
Re: Kudos
[info]penny_reese wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 09:58 pm (UTC)
Her values are bigoted, but she has a right to them and they don't stop her looking attractive which is what I understand is the qualification for being Miss World. If she's lost the title for failing to fulfil the accompanying contractual obligations, then fair enough. But if, as suggested, she has lost the title because of her opinions on matters, then this is wrong. I think her opinion is incorrect, but you don't solve one wrong by doing another (sacking people for stated opinions as opposed actual actions).
Re: Kudos
[info]aleuwhitewolf wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 10:05 pm (UTC)
I'm not saying she has a right to them and I highly doubt that she's been fired for stating her opinion. Sure she's pretty but do we want someone with bigoted opinions as a role model? I sure as hell don't. Also from what it looks like she's just saying that just to get attention.
I am a Muslim so lowered the volume as my wife was in the next room. The crazy lady. I mean the nake
[info]famulla wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 06:02 pm (UTC)
Instead, Donald Trump, the entrepreneur who owns the Miss USA organisation, told reporters that Miss Prejean had simply failed to do her job: refusing, to appear on Larry King's CNN show, or show up at several public events organised by the pageant's sponsors. She was not dressed. Mr. Trump.
I saw this live and I loved the half-naked lady. I am a Muslim so lowered the volume as my wife was in the next room. The crazy lady. I mean the naked lady is shameless in front of Larry King and truly she deserves the crown but how does the builder come in, that is what I simply do not understand. Let her have the crown. All these nudes have history of condom extra usage, nothing new in their habits.
The working capital is the decisive (acid) test
Get this wrong you have no idea if you have the high-geared capital or hidden contingencies that may crop up faster then you think. The prudency concept of forgotten by many. Why. We are short of funds but not of brains. We are watchdog and not blood hounds. We create the working capital as 2 assets and 1 liabilities. How far are you going to squeeze these?
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla

one i cantake two i cannot
[info]famulla wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 06:06 pm (UTC)
At that time, a porn actor who had returned from working in Brazil spread the virus to three actresses who had performed with him. A transsexual performer unrelated to the other cases also tested positive.

Porn actress tests positive for HIV
L.A. County and California health officials say they will look into the case. It's the first confirmed case in the Southern California industry since 2004, when production was closed for four weeks.
In the latest case, HIV tests of the woman's partners have been negative for the virus, according to Adult Industry Medical Healthcare Foundation officials. Those partners are not being allowed to perform at this time and are being encouraged to test again in 14 days, said Brooke Hunter, the clinic's administrator.
"This is really not a major event," Hunter said, adding that the infected actress had worked "very infrequently."
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
A difference in opinion does NOT constitute bigotry.
[info]collin_brown wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 06:25 pm (UTC)
I'm opposed to some opinions. However, I refuse to go about labelling those I disagree with as bigoted / racist / fascist and so on. Viewpoints (freedom of speech) should be respected enough by commenter's not to pigeonhole people with (soul-staining) words.

Just ask yourself if you would like it?

Marxist and commies excluded. Naturally they're fair game anytime of day.

;-)
Re: A difference in opinion does NOT constitute bigotry.
[info]valital wrote:
Friday, 12 June 2009 at 09:49 pm (UTC)
Fair enough but it seems to me that it depends on what these opinions are. What about white supremacists? Are we going to say that they're just opinions and we should respect them. I'm not saying this is the same, but all the talk about freedom of opinion holds up to a certain point. It depends on what that point is for you? If ex-Miss C had come out as a white supremacist on stage, would we be defending her right to be a racist?
Re: A difference in opinion does NOT constitute bigotry.
[info]colin_brown wrote:
Friday, 12 June 2009 at 10:54 pm (UTC)
In my opinion, the supremacists' in this world are non-thinkers. Should they be denied a platform? No. Why? Well to answer that one, let's take a look at the actions of a more plausible man such as President Obama.

Obama has passed at least 6 executive orders since taking up office. One of those orders is a proposal to fund a U.S. wide 'civilian' based police-force. That's right. Obama wants a 400'000 strong (armed) and uniformed 'civilian' police force.

Ignore the fact that America already has a very large Home Guard, a National Coast Guard, and a formidable Army, Navy and Air-Force plus, a 3 million strong armed police-force.

What is Obama up to?

Why does Obama need 400'000 Brown Shirts? We can all guess the answer to that one. Put simply, Obama isn't the man people voted for.

Potentially, Obama is 100x more dangerous than Hitler was. Just look at the hardware under this mans control. Now, compare that threat, to the lone, idiotic supremacist who can just about manage to draw an audience of two listeners at any one time.

Who's the threat? Obama; or the supremacist?

It's all a matter of scale and perception. Focus on the big issues now, then turn our attentions to lesser distractions that is - providing we are still around to debate them.

Video evidence link: http://tinyurl.com/krqerx
Re: A difference in opinion does NOT constitute bigotry.
[info]valital wrote:
Monday, 15 June 2009 at 10:48 am (UTC)
It seems to me that you are diverting the issue. How is what you're saying relevant to the issue of freedom of speech?

Of course Heads of State are potentially more dangerous than you and me as they have by definition more power. And admittedly an American president is going to be comparatively more powerful than the leader of another country.

But your point was about differences of opinions and whether it's right to consider a specific opinion racist or bigoted and I don't feel that you're further comment really expanded on that issue or was related to my reply.

By the way, I'm not suggesting that freedom of speech should be revoked, I'm just questioning this blind faith in the ideology that "all opinions are equal in value" and should not be judged bigoted or racist. Sometimes they are.
Carrie Prejean
[info]simon_gladdish wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 06:32 pm (UTC)
They obviously weren't paying her enough to appear opposite Larry King live! Donald 'Because I'm worth it' Trump is beginning to look like a politically correct coward.
Miss California
[info]gongdonkey wrote:
Thursday, 11 June 2009 at 07:16 pm (UTC)
Like it's important ? News team slipping ?
But what about Trump's comb-over. Makes Arthur Scargill lookrefined !!!!!
Contract violations? Yeah, right.
[info]rob_roi wrote:
Friday, 12 June 2009 at 04:49 am (UTC)
Here is a released text message of Miss Prejean to the pageant director: "What are u gonna do fire me for volunteering for the special olympics hahaha ur crazy No I am doing this appearance. You do not need details. Its for the SPECIAL OLYMPICS!!! You just need to know I will be doing it alright."

They objected to her appearing at a benefit for Special Olympics??? This is a contract violation??? Pathetic. I she sues the pants off the creeps.
Gossip Guy
[info]nickhogansucks wrote:
Wednesday, 11 November 2009 at 02:49 am (UTC)
Gee what a shock, a Carrie Prejean Sex Tape was leaked. Who didn't see that coming!

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date