NSA mass phone surveillance is ‘lawful’, US federal judge rules
Decision comes just weeks after another judge said government’s data collection programme was probably ‘not constitutional’
The NSA’s programme of mass phone data collection is “controversial but lawful”, according to a ruling from a federal judge in the US.
Ruling in the case brought against the government by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), US District Judge William H Pauley III issued a 53-page court opinion declaring the surveillance is a “counter-punch” to terrorism.
Judge Pauley’s ruling yesterday comes just weeks after fellow US District Judge Richard Leon said that wide scale phone tapping was “likely not constitutional”, violating a ban on unreasonable search.
“The question for this court is whether the government's bulk telephony metadata program is lawful,” wrote Judge Pauley. “This court finds it is.”
Given the conflict on the issue within the courts, ACLU lawyers said they would be taking their case to an appeal in Manhattan. “This mass call tracking program constitutes a serious threat to Americans' privacy and we think Judge Pauley is wrong in concluding otherwise,” said Brett Max Kaufman, an attorney with the ACLU's National Security Project.
Explaining his decision, Judge Pauley said the 9/11 terrorist attacks showed the government could not afford to miss any threat.
“This blunt tool only works because it collects everything,” the judge said. “The collection is broad, but the scope of counterterrorism investigations is unprecedented.”
Judge Pauley nonetheless accepted that such a programme, if unchecked, “imperils the civil liberties of every citizen” and said he was aware of debate surrounding the subject across the nation, in Congress and at the White House.
The ACLU sued the government earlier this year in the wake of security leaks from the former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, and Judge Pauley said that the source of the revelations played a part in his decision.
“It cannot possibly be that lawbreaking conduct by a government contractor that reveals state secrets — including the means and methods of intelligence gathering — could frustrate Congress's intent. To hold otherwise would spawn mischief,” he said.
Diving in at the deep end is no excuse for shirking the style stakes
- 1 World Cup 2014: 20 things we learned in Brazil
- 2 Why I'm on the brink of burning my Israeli passport
- 3 War is war: Why I stand with Israel
- 4 L'Oreal cuts ties with Belgium supporter Axelle Despiegelaere after hunting trip photographs
Game of Thrones author George RR Martin says 'f*** you' to fans who fear he will die before finishing Westeros saga
Ian Thorpe gay: Olympic swimmer comes out in Parkinson interview
Pamplona bull run: Man who contributed to a survival guide for the festival falls foul of the raging beasts
Israel-Gaza conflict: William Hague calls for ceasefire but says Israel 'has the right to defend itself'
Supermoon 2014: When and why will the moon look bigger and brighter this summer?
Sustained immigration has not harmed Britons' employment, say government advisers
War is war: Why I stand with Israel
7/7 memorial defaced on anniversary of 2005 attacks with ‘Blair lied thousands died’ graffiti
Australia facing international condemnation after turning around Sri Lankans at sea
Even when it brutalises one of its own teenage citizens, America is helpless against Israel
Socialist Worker called to apologise over ‘vile’ article saying Eton schoolboy Horatio Chapple's death is ‘reason to save the polar bears’
£70000 per annum: Harrington Starr: Information Security Manager (ISO 27001, A...
£30000 - £45000 per annum + Benefits + Bonus: Harrington Starr: C# Developer (...
£60000 - £80000 per annum + Benefits + Bonus: Harrington Starr: C# Integration...
£75000 - £85000 per annum + ex bens: Deerfoot IT Resources Limited: Biztalk Te...