World

Rain (AM and PM) 8° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

Obama braced for health battle

Conservatives campaign against promised reforms to reduce the cost of care

By David Usborne, US Editor

Most Americans support a greater role for government in managing the healthcare system, to bring down the costs of insurance premiums

ALAMY

Most Americans support a greater role for government in managing the healthcare system, to bring down the costs of insurance premiums

US President Barack Obama issued an urgent call yesterday for quick action on sweeping health-care reforms in an attempt to deliver on his most important domestic policy promise from last year's campaign, against fierce opposition from Republicans and much of the medical industry. It "cannot wait", he said.

After months of behind-doors drafting on Capitol Hill, the first committee hearings on an 852-page bill will begin in the House of Representatives today, marking the start of what promises to be a long, hot summer of tumultuous debate that could decide the course of the Obama presidency.

With so much at stake, the administration is readying a full-on campaign in support of the reforms. It has been boosted by new opinion polls showing strong public support for an overhaul of a system that leaves 47 million Americans without coverage and where premiums and drug costs are increasing. In a New York Times poll, 72 per cent of those surveyed said they were ready for government to take a greater role.

Health-care reform will be a key focus of a rare Rose Garden press conference with Mr Obama today and an unprecedented town hall-style discussion of experts and members of the public to be broadcast by ABC News from the White House tomorrow.

"Everyone in the health-care community is going to have to come together and do their job. Our families, our businesses and our long-term fiscal health demand that we act now," Mr Obama said, before wryly adding: "To revive an old saying from the campaign, 'yes we can'. We can get this done."

Mr Obama was speaking at a White House event to trumpet an important fillip to the cause: a promise by the pharmaceutical industry to contribute $80bn (£49bn) towards lowering the cost of prescription medicines for older Americans, on condition that the wider reform legislation makes it into law.

It has taken more than 15 years since the disastrous reform effort of 1993 – spearheaded by Hillary Clinton on behalf of her husband – for Washington to have the stomach to consider a new overhaul of a system that by most reckonings is a national scandal.

But even opponents recognise that Americans are hungry for it and that the people elected Mr Obama in part because he was promising it.

That does not mean that the trenches that are already being dug in Washington by all sides – members of both parties in Congress and lobbyists for the $2 trillion industry – will not be deep and treacherous.

Even moderate Democrats suggest that passing all the reforms that Mr Obama wants may not be feasible this year. "I think there's a lot of concern in the Democratic caucus," Senator Dianne Feinstein of California said.

The draft bill in the House hews closely to Mr Obama's own vision and adheres to the main goals of cutting costs and extending coverage to as many uninsured Americans as possible. However, like the President himself, it makes no explicit promise of universal coverage, where no one would fall through the cracks.

Nonetheless, it would create a public insurance entity to compete with private insurers and, hopefully, bring costs of health insurance down. Individual Americans would be obliged to buy some form of insurance with large subsidies for those who were less well off, while employers would face tough penalties for not insuring workers.

The obstacles are many, however, not least the rhetoric from conservatives that will shortly blow up into a fully-fledged tempest telling Americans that Mr Obama is trying to create a "socialised" and "European" health system that will reduce options for patients and adversely affect and even ration care.

"We can make incredible improvements in American health care, but I don't think having more government – in effect putting Washington between you and your doctor – is the way to go," Mitch McConnell, the Senate minority leader said at the weekend, calling the Obama approach a "non-starter".

There is also the matter of cost, which comes as Mr Obama fights a growing perception among the public that all his actions, notably the bailouts of Wall Street and the car industry, are building a new federal deficit hole from which America will have a hard time climbing out. The House draft bill unveiled on Friday notably does not include any kind of price tag.

A different version of the reform devised inside the Senate Finance Committee was sent back to the drawing board last week after it emerged that enacting it would cost a staggering $1.6 trillion over 10 years. That number was seized upon by Republicans and even scared Mr Obama's closest supporters.

Not everyone in the industry was so surprised, however.

"The shocker to me is that anyone is shocked," said Drew Altman, the president of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a health-care policy and research group. "With the details on the table, it has finally gotten real."

Don't forget climate change: Scientists' plea

Twenty leading climate scientists have written an open letter to President Obama and the US Congress urging them to take stronger action on carbon dioxide emissions to avert "ruinous climate change". They say that current plans on cutting emissions are not going to be enough to prevent potentially catastrophic change.

The scientists, including some of the biggest names in climate science, said it is widely thought in political circles that cutting emission to limit carbon dioxide concentrations to 450 parts per million, and global temperature rises to C, will be enough, when the evidence suggests otherwise.

"We and many others are of the view that these objectives are inadequate to sustain the integrity of global climate and to hold the risk of ruinous climate change to an acceptably low level," say the authors, who include George Woodwell of Woods Hole Research Centre, Massachusetts, and Michael Mann of Pennsylvania State University.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Forget climate change
[info]rooster281 wrote:
Tuesday, 23 June 2009 at 07:08 am (UTC)
"The scientists, including some of the biggest names in climate science". Really? Woods Hole is an advocacy group and Michael Mann is the discredited author of the Hockey stick, embarassing now even to the IPCC.
Tough hill to climb
[info]had_it wrote:
Tuesday, 23 June 2009 at 09:28 am (UTC)
Washington, June 8, PRNewswire-USNewswire The nine Republican Senators who sent a letter today to President Barack Obama to express their opposition to a central part of his health care plan have benefited greatly from health care and insurance industry donations, a new analysis from Public Campaign Action Fund shows. The Senators have collectively taken 17.7 million from insurance and health care interests, according to data analyzed at the Center for Responsive Politics website, opensecrets.org. That amounts to nearly 2 million per Senator over their careers.

Diagnosis: Reform (opensecrets. org) Starting in the 2008 election cycle, the health sector has given more money to Democrats - who had seized control of Congress in 2006 - than to Republicans, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. This was the first time since the 1992 election cycle, right before the Clinton administration's failed health care reform attempt, that the health sector made Democrats its financial darlings.... The American health care system is set to get a lobotomy and diverse special interests are spending big bucks to make sure they're in the surgery room when it happens.
President Obama's health plan
[info]sebouhian wrote:
Tuesday, 23 June 2009 at 01:18 pm (UTC)
The opposition asserts that it's ok to spend trillions of dollars on wars IN A FEW YEARS! that kill and maim people on both sides, but it's not ok to spend (maybe) 1.6 trillion dollars OVER A PERIOD OF TEN YEARS! to insure health and survival to the U.S. populace.
Over 50 Million Americans without Healthcare
[info]cardrew wrote:
Tuesday, 23 June 2009 at 02:24 pm (UTC)
It is a total disgrace that "The World's Richest Country" fails its people so miserably.

It used to be that if you didn't have a job, you didn't have health care, now it is even worse. I worked for a Fortune 100 company, a respected name on both sides of the Atlantic, they no longer offer health care to their workers, just a savings plan.

McConnell's statement "We can make incredible improvements in American healthcare" is laughable, if this is true why did they do nothing for the last 8 years? The corrupt health insurance industry is now trying to bribe Washington to keep their gravy train.

America needs a government health system now.

Stop the plan
[info]lasvegasrich wrote:
Tuesday, 23 June 2009 at 03:56 pm (UTC)
When Sen. Grassley(R-Iowa), was told that conservative commentator Rush Limbaugh was lying about the effects of Pres. Obama's plan, he replied in effect: Good, we have to stop this healthcare plan anyway we can. 72% of Americans indicate they want the healthcare system overhauled, but that doesn't mean a thing to many in Washington.
An American Perspective
[info]msdusti wrote:
Wednesday, 24 June 2009 at 05:34 am (UTC)
I live in the U.S. and I am appalled by the Republican's animosity towards this issue. Greed and corruption go hand in hand here in the states. I voted for Obama because he truly believes in doing what is best for the people of this county. For the first time in my life I honestly feel that we have a leader that we can believe in.
I know what it's like to be uninsured. Until recently, I hadn't had health insurance for twelve years. The insurance I have now costs my husband and I over $12,000 a year with very high deductibles and large out of pocket costs. Even with insurance we are almost bankrupt. And it's the same way for most every other American as well. That is, those that are "lucky" enough to have health insurance. For those that don't, they are forced to pay huge sums out of pocket and they are denied the best medical treatment for their condition because they can't afford to pay for it. The cost of medical care in the U.S. is unregulated and, as such, doctors and hospitals are allowed to charge far more than in other countries where the cost of health care is regulated.
A public option is the only way to go. America can no longer afford any other option. One would think that even the most corrupt politicians could see that.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date