Mary Wakefield: Wikipedia doesn't have all the answers

World

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 6° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

Obama: Twelve months on, the star falls back to earth

AP

President Barack Obama and British Prime Minister Gordon Brown walk from the Oval Office of the White House in Washington President Barack Obama and British Prime Minister Gordon Brown walk from the Oval Office of the White House in Washington

Video: Snub? What snub?

« Back to Obama: Twelve months on, the star falls back to earth

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Page 1 of 6
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] >>
BHO
[info]il_767 wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 12:49 am (UTC)


His utter inexperience in anything like an executive position is now on full display and it's not a pretty sight.

Utter naivete as well, what the hell is a president doing wasting time demonising his critics ? He should be above such nonsense.

As for Corzine, just another multi-millionaire Democrat, NJ deserves better.
Re: BHO
[info]cjdobs wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 10:13 am (UTC)
I'm stil amazed that people call him 'naive' for thinking things thourugh before opening his mouth and committing. Surely Americans can see what diving in feet first does for you (quagmire accomplished???)

Mind you, thats a little unfair to Bush. He didnt dive in, it was all pre planned and calculated, they wanted Iraq's oil (outlined as far back as the Reagan administration by Rumsfeld and Cheney) and they got it. The means justify the end in criminal Republican eyes.

If thats what being 'tough' is all about, you can keep it. Personally I like a President whose calm and steady and not that keen to press the 'whup ass' button at every given opportunity. Sadly, most Americans call that 'weak governance' whereas we would call it 'intelligent reflection'.
Re: BHO - [info]us_jingoist - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 12:37 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: BHO - [info]fashanu88 - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 01:24 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: BHO - [info]sd_tom - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 01:49 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: BHO - [info]schillky - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 02:14 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: BHO - [info]1200fps - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 02:46 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: BHO - [info]scrumpy2003 - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 05:19 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: BHO - [info]oldfloyd - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 07:57 am (UTC) Expand
Re: BHO - [info]alheimstead - Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 09:55 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: BHO - [info]davidj2 - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 05:52 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: BHO - [info]frase33 - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 08:57 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: BHO - [info]il_767 - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 10:09 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: BHO - [info]stwoodworth - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 01:31 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: BHO - [info]gkuhf - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 02:32 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: BHO - [info]drewridama - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 03:49 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: BHO - [info]tpm47 - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 07:26 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: BHO - [info]alheimstead - Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 09:23 pm (UTC) Expand
Obama represents amateurishness, wrapped in naivete, inside credulity.
[info]arthurshort wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 03:38 am (UTC)
What's come from Obama holding his tongue while Iranian demonstrators were being shot and from his recognizing the legitimacy of a thug regime illegitimately returned to power in a fraudulent election? Or from taking human rights off the table re: China and from his shameful refusal to see the Dalai Lama? China hasn't moved an inch on anything, anywhere. Or from the new-respect-for-Muslims Cairo speech and the unprecedented pressure on Israel for a 'total settlement freeze?' Arab-Israeli peace prospects have arguably 'regressed'. Or from his sudden abrogation of missile defense arrangements with Poland and the Czech Republic that Russia had virulently opposed? For the East Europeans it was a crushing blow, a gratuitous restoration of Russian influence over a region that thought it had regained independence under American protection.

Methinks the man represents amateurishness, wrapped in naivete, inside credulity. In short, the very stuff of Nobels.
Re: Obama represents aaivete, inside credulity
[info]boeticia wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 05:28 am (UTC)
Compared to previous unscrupulous Republican politicians' hard-as-nails corrupt methods in running things at home and abroad, yes, Obama is (still) rather seemingly naive and overcareful. That might change for this president of just over a year, compared to Bush's agressive ten-year in office (and the colossal damage he left behind him). Or do we want more of the Bush and Co. kind of management?
International politics is a far more complex matter, and one should be very careful not to threaten any sovereign country, whether allies or hostile enemies, to do things in a certain way....or else.
As for those so-called missile defenses for Poland and the Czech Republic, which was actually a project of the previous government, there are pros and contras as to their effectiveness . It might be wise for those countries to first weigh the consequences of installing such defenses on their territories.
The Russians according to news reports, had threatened to counter those missiles with their own.
and that would be a deadly tit for tat.
But whatever the U.S. does, the world won't want to have another Bush, Cheney, neo-con scenario!


Re: Obama represents aaivete, inside credulity - [info]crotchcritter - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 10:07 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Obama represents aaivete, inside credulity - [info]alfredhussein - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 12:54 am (UTC) Expand
Job Application - [info]transitdave - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 01:15 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Job Application without complaining - [info]boeticia - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 03:49 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Job Application without complaining - [info]oldfloyd - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 08:16 am (UTC) Expand
evil behind the mask
[info]someofusknow wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 04:07 am (UTC)
'Last year he could do no wrong'

Only in the eyes of the uninformed and brainless.

Anyone who looked beyond the maintream media hype and thought it through soon recognised him for what he is -a puppet of American sorporations, put there to facilitate the biggest looting exercise in all of history.

As everyone who knew the real game at the time commented, the change Obummer brings is pretty ugly: mass layoffs, wealth transfer to banks and other corrupt institutions, affirmation of torture and rendition, more war, more corruption and more lies. Perhaps even forced vaccination and internment camps. The volence inflicted on the innocent in Pittsburgh is indicative of the evil that lies behind the mask.
Re: someoneconfused
[info]boeticia wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 06:04 am (UTC)
I can only suppose you're describing what Bush and his administration did looong before Obama came...wars, corruptions (and HOW)...wealth transfers to multinational corporations, especially those deriving from oil revenues, as well as, wealth transfers to private pockets ....buddies heaved in high positions like the World Bank, etc., etc.
Forced vaccinations and internment camps..WHAT? THAT, too? How mean can one really get!!!

Re: someoneconfused - [info]someofusknow - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 08:07 am (UTC) Expand
Re: someoneconfused - [info]polotick - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 06:12 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: someoneconfused - [info]boeticia - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 04:02 am (UTC) Expand
Re: someoneconfused - [info]oldfloyd - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 08:10 am (UTC) Expand
Re: evil behind the mask - [info]frase33 - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 08:48 pm (UTC) Expand
Iver Brayne Shortie
[info]floppsiefrog wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 04:32 am (UTC)
Yeah, the naive idiot has not only got two wars on the go and supports a fanatical, racist apartheid regime with plans to obliterate Iran and dominate the entire Middle East, but he spends more on the military than the rest of the world combined and supports the parasitic banking community which is busy ravaging the international economy while enriching itself. Yep, a Republican revival is definitely needed to promote peace and tranquility.
Re: Iver Brayne Shortie..and to refresh your short memory
[info]boeticia wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 05:41 am (UTC)
But your Republicans did all that what you just said...two wars, Iraq and Afghanistan, remember?
Plans to obliterate Iran...that was, and still is, Cheney's old man's dream. The naive idiot Obama spends more on the military - why do you think the U.S. has now a great econmic crisis, not only due to Madoff and banking community's abuses, but because the Bush government overspent to finance the two wars...or do military troops only get paid with popcorn and peanuts?
Dear fellow, a warmongering Republican revival would be a nightmare, and is definitely what the world does not need, because when they were in government, there was NO peace and tranquility.
Re: Iver Brayne Shortie..and to refresh your short memory - [info]davidj2 - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 06:00 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Iver Brayne Shortie..and to refresh your short memory - [info]alheimstead - Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 09:29 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info] - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 04:45 am (UTC)
Re: How-to-keep-long-distance-love-alive
[info]reinertorheit wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 05:14 am (UTC)

Hello, Barack? It's me, Gordon. No, I I haven't called about the air-conditioning, it's me, Gordon. Gordon Brown. The Prime Minister of Britain. No, really it's me. Where's Tony? Och, he's off trying to become President of Europe. No, don't laugh, please, it's true. Many people support him for the position. He can do what? I'm not sure he could even fit it up there. In fact that's why I was calling, Barack, to see if I could get your support for Tony's bid to... Hello? Hello-hello? Och, the line's gone dead...
His star has dimmed
[info]nickelflipper wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 06:34 am (UTC)
boeticia, "ten-year in office"? I think you mean "tenure" in office. Bush was in office 8 years. I am so sick and tired of listening to the "colossal damage" done by the Bush administration. What Obama's followers don't seem to realize is that Obama has tripled the national debt. Health care? Wellpoint did a numbers crunch, and the average private insurance cost will triple under Obamacare. Of course, those expecting freebies and who don't pay taxes don't worry about such things. What they don't realize is that they will be fined for not having insurance. And as far as Obama being "highminded" and "conciliatory", that is simply another way of saying he's not going to stand up to our enemies. Remember how he rolled over for Putin, just knowing that would make Putin join us on sanctions on Iran? Didn't work. Russia has announced they aren't going the "sanctions on Iran route". Yes, he turned his back on our allies, Poland and the Czech Republic when he announced no missle shield. That leaves them vulnerable to invasion by Russia, but Obama plans to install a new system. Putin is meeting with Jeffrey Immelt, on Obama's board of economic advisors and head of General Electric (which also runs MSNBC) to discuss using parts made by GE for the "new system" Obama plans to implement. Obama followers don't seem to have a problem with this, yet still whoop and holler about Halliburton. So what if an Obama White House insider gets all the contracts for the new missle system?? The double standard is breathtaking. Those who follow Obama always, without fail, use the old and tired excuse of the horrid mess Bush left us. They will still be using it in 3 years as they fail to really look at Obama and what he is doing. Blaming it on Bush gives Obama an easy out for the failure of his stimulus plan (we were supposed to have 7 million new jobs created by August of this year and unemployment no higher than 8%). His excuse...things were worse than they thought. No...you just can't spend your way out of bankruptcy. Keynesian economics has never worked. Ever. Democrats blasted Bush for going for a run when the country was in difficulty, yet Obama has played more golf in 9 months than Bush did in 3 years. Add to that basketball, interminable campaigning, fundraisers (22 compared to Bush's 6 in the same time frame) and you've got a man who loves to give speeches, but apparently doesn't like to govern. And how many soldiers will die in Afghanistan before Obama decides what to do? Either pull out entirely or give our soldiers the help they need. NOW!
Re: The Lone Star has dimmed
[info]boeticia wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 09:27 am (UTC)
With the horrid enormous mess the last U.S. president left for his successor to clean up after an 8-year (thanks for the correction) tenure, with two on-going wars (Bush's war, and not Obama's), and billions of dollars of taxpayers money (war tax)and other revenues spent, constructing a war infrastructure in Iraq, among which, a U.S. embassy-and-residential & recreational facilities for three thousand American functionaries and staff - the largest in the world, it's said, and installation of several military bases (one report said at least a dozen or more spread out all over the once- Cradle of Civilisation. All this, just for ONE little country? And of course billions of dollars gushed like oil to support (some would call it to bribe), local functionaries with doubtful loyalties. It had been reported that some U.S. officials had access to the loot, and they didn't lose time while at it.
For someone with a short memory, surely you might at least remember the broken pieces of foreign relations porcelain?
Well, Mr. Obama, your president now, and who earns at the most, a little respect, made sure that the porcelain is almost ...glued back to its original form. Old Europe has forgiven - but not forgotten - the wilfull insults it had to bear just because its countries were not willing to sacrifice their soldiers for Bush's and Co.'s war games.
Aren't they glad now after yesterday's bomb caused once again deaths of long-suffering Iraqians. A reminder that Iraq, sadly, for some time still, will not be an oasis of peace and tranquility. This is what happens when a once
major power meddles in the affairs and lives of peoples of other countries. One need not even go into the matter of Afghanistan, whose future, too, seems uncertain.
Obama should just go on with what has to be done to make the U.S. healthy again in more ways than one. He has truly a difficult task, what with people ready to jump at him and malign him with every step. More power to him, I hope he gets tough to achieve his goal.
One shudders to think if he fails, we have the nightmarish
vision of a Palin, in full combat uniform on still another aircraft carrier mouthing: "Mission accomplished"!

Re: The Lone Star has dimmed - [info]corporeal_v001 - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 12:48 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: The Lone Star has dimmed - [info]oldfloyd - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 08:23 am (UTC) Expand
Re: The Lone Star has dimmed - [info]oldfloyd - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 02:03 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: The Lone Star has dimmed - [info]goldrecordsport - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 03:23 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: The Lone Star has dimmed - [info]belllek1 - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 03:33 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: His star has dimmed - [info]aayeager - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 03:07 am (UTC) Expand
Re: His star has dimmed - [info]danadee - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 12:13 pm (UTC) Expand
Fanatical Racist Regime?
[info]arthurshort wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 06:57 am (UTC)
Iver Brayne Shortie: I guess you mean Hamas right? I entirely agree with you.

Its disgusting how Palestinian detainees are being tortured to death in Palestinian Authority jails, (and gays and protesters are being summarily executed by Hamasy). We should agitate for the Palestinians to follow Israel's example where Palestinian prisoners (including convicted terrorists) in custody there are studying for Israeli university degrees (at Israeli taxpayers’ expense) and also given cable TV, IPods and dental treatment.
Re: Fanatical Racist Regime?
[info]boeticia wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 09:37 am (UTC)
Another exercise in disinformation, what? The recent UN- report on what really took place in Gaza must be quite a bitter pill to swallow. Never you mind, like Mary Poppins said: Just a spoonful of sugar makes the medicine go down...
I knew...
[info]taxan975 wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 09:23 am (UTC)
...this would happen. It always happens when you put people on a pedestal. But give the guy credit: he is only human and really tries to change things.

It really makes one thing clear: how desperate people were after Bush that. They lavished all the praise - and a halo - on Obama before he had even done anything. And now the poor guy is blamed for not delivering already.

It will take a long time to clean up Bush's mess, so he really needs our support rather than criticism (be it founded or unfounded).
Re: I knew...
[info]frase33 wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 08:49 pm (UTC)
Oh really?!
What exactly has he changed?
He is a LIAR and a fraud.
Watch the Obama Deception free on Google video for the truth....
oooooo baaaaaaaaa maaaaaaaaaa
Re: I knew...no, you didn't! - [info]boeticia - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 04:10 am (UTC) Expand
Re: I knew...no, you didn't! - [info]oldfloyd - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 08:30 am (UTC) Expand
Re: I knew... - [info]alheimstead - Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 06:26 am (UTC) Expand
Mediators are never popular ...
[info]tallise wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 10:40 am (UTC)
... I despair of humankind, so what's new.
Many journalists are susceptible to celebrity politicians
[info]larkspur_14 wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 10:55 am (UTC)
and happily transform them into superstars. Many ordinary people are not, but their views are of course discounted and mocked by those who reckon they know best. So now journalists are noticing what millions of ordinary voters recognised from the start - but, surprise surprise, they prefer not to admit their glorification of the supposedly transformative "light-bringer" was always a triumph of fiction over fact.
Obama is pleasing the Islamists too much!
[info]nooraza wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 12:07 pm (UTC)
No wonder the Islamists including in Dark Age Islamic-ruled countries especially that vile Saudi and Iran, are getting bolder! The Repblicans will win the next election,I'm sure of that! Hilalry should have won instead - she would have done things differently, as a firm feminist woman!
Re: Obama is pleasing the Islamists too much!
[info]lucid1984 wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 12:30 pm (UTC)
Right then.

Speaking as a woman- our genitals have nothing to do with the way we do our jobs, or shouldn't. Please note that there aer female members of the NRA, BNP, the KKK....


Gender, sex, whatever you want to call it- get over it. If equality is truly to exist, people shouldn't be pigeon-holed based on their chromasomes.

Get over it - it's time feminists led the world! - [info]nooraza - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 12:59 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Get over it - it's time feminists led the world! - [info]oldfloyd - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 02:06 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]nooraza - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 02:12 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Obama is pleasing the Islamists too much! - [info]corporeal_v001 - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 12:33 pm (UTC) Expand
Dark Age and savage Islamists will never win - thank Christ! - [info]nooraza - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 12:57 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]matt_91912113 - Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 03:23 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]nooraza - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 11:11 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Obama is pleasing the Islamists too much! - [info]alheimstead - Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 07:16 am (UTC) Expand
[info]alana2 wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 12:28 pm (UTC)
What galls many Americans is not that he isn't aggressive enough. It's that he's passive-aggressive - downright nasty to anyone he thinks isn't on his side 100%. His enemies list includes too many people and too many occupations, and all those people feel the sting of his dismissive and snide comments and are starting to consider him their enemy, too.
[info]oldfloyd wrote:
Friday, 30 October 2009 at 08:38 am (UTC)
Nailed it there.
He is the guy you meet at a party, leaning against the wall, next to the doorway, with a gorgeous woman leaning next to him, smoking a cigarette, smiling and greeting anyone who passes through, then whispering ridicule to the woman the moment they get out of earshot.
(no subject) - [info]alheimstead - Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 07:17 am (UTC) Expand
All fluff & no substance
[info]snotcricket wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 12:28 pm (UTC)
I remember watching his triumphal tour of the world not as President but as a candidate, remember all the shallow & the glossy falling at his feet in some form of worship etc etc.

Months earlier he was a none event, then a daytime TV presenter much wealthier than any Republican & with far too much control within the media began to be the force behind the throne & the sad & pathetic followed like Lemmings.

Perhaps he will CHANGE something who knows? but given the near closure of his first year in office & the fact that all Presidential elections begin during the third year he'd better get his arse into gear because as yet he has changed absolutely bugger all & shows no sign of doing so.

Sadly by the time US Preseidents wake from the hangover of their election success time is so short to re-election they usually go out & bomb something, given the parlous state of the world & for the foreseeable future that option is only open to the madman & lets face it anyone that nails their colours so transparently to the shallowness of daytime TV are likely to drown in the deep waters of the real world.

His major announcements to the world include:

Got a dog just like I said I would.
Kids have had their flu jab.
Wife bit of an ace with the Hula Hoop.
I can't play golf & be in the White House.
I do most of my thinking on the golf course.
I do most of my thinking on the john.
John does most of my thinking for me.
Waterwings a positive boon to the shallows.

Nearest he'll get to thaving the X factor is the Cowell thing, no doubt singing something from his love of Oprah.
Re: All fluff & no substance
[info]boeticia wrote:
Friday, 30 October 2009 at 04:37 am (UTC)
It's strange how people like you can be so minutely observant when it comes to President Obama and his family.
One didn't hear the slightest squeak of criticism when G.W. Bush was eight years in office, ruining the country inside and abroad. And one musn't forget, how many lost their lives in the two wars he indulged in...for his satisfaction?
The world also remembers how he phonily posed in full combat uniform on an aircraft carrier, when in truth, he was reported to have played truant at the time when he was
supposed to be in the military service, but got away with it, thank to his family's name.

Mrs. Obama's hulahooping seems harmless enough, compared to the shenanigans of the ex-president's twin daughters, who
spent much of their precious time, as reported, getting stoned once too often in discos, with their equally spoiled-brat friends. That's the kind of thing you admire, am I right? Enough said.
At least, hulahooping keeps one fit, a great way to lose weight, and a lot of fun...do you agree?
Re: All fluff & no substance - [info]snotcricket - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 10:36 am (UTC) Expand
Re: All fluff & no substance - [info]alheimstead - Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 05:23 am (UTC) Expand
Re: All rightist fluff & no substance - [info]boeticia - Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 04:02 pm (UTC) Expand
Do What's Right? NOT
[info]tommyii wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 12:30 pm (UTC)
" In his speech in Hackensack, he asked the crowd "to cast aside the cynics and the sceptics and prove to all Americans that leaders who do what's right and who do what's hard will be rewarded and not rejected"."
You mean like promising transparency and then doing everything behind closed doors, like saying no lobbiests on my team, then putting in dozens. Like insisting would only have people of integrity on his team, then hiring tax-cheats. Like saying the White House was not for sale - then renting it out to anyone willing to donate a buck to the Dems. Like saying he had a plan for Afghanastan during the campaign - but had nothing at all. Like saying he would take on the responsibility of the Job, but it's still all Bush's fault.
That's the problem - when you promise to do "What's Right" then you do the exact opposite. We aren't stupid, Obama.
Not vengeful?
[info]ctmom4 wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 12:52 pm (UTC)
"Obama has created an atmosphere of no fear," Douglas Brinkley, a history professor at Rice University and political biographer, told the National Journal. "Nobody is really worried about the revenge of Barack Obama, because he is not a vengeful man. That's what we love about him; he is so high-minded, and a conciliatory guy, and he tries to govern with a sense of consensus – all noble goals, but they don't get you very far in this Washington knifing environment."

This could not be further from the truth. He is in fact, a petty, small minded, thin skinned man, who remembers every slight and goes to war from his bully pulpit against anyone who criticizes him. He will fire salvos at Fox news - because he doesn't have enough fawning sycophantic boot licking media cheerleaders?- Republicans, business, doctors, radio talkers, anyone who gets in his way. Just don't ask for a decision about Afghanistan. He is Nixon 2.0. 2012 can't come fast enough.
LIVE FREE OR DIE
[info]anchorbeach wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 12:53 pm (UTC)
We aren't going to allow the destruction of our nation. The United States of America is being targeted and us Patriots are beginning to realize it, hence we pick up the gauntlet thrown at our feet and are taking back our nation, our government, our way of life. Get ready for the re-industrialization of our nation, because we are going to rock and roll and crush chinese and every other competitor out there.
Re: LIVE FREE OR DIE
[info]floppsiefrog wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 03:17 pm (UTC)
Couldn't agree more, but you better get ready to enjoy Chinese wages old chum.
Re: LIVE FREE OR DIE - [info]boeticia - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 04:48 am (UTC) Expand
Re: LIVE FREE OR DIE - [info]anchorbeach - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 02:53 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: LIVE FREE OR DIE - [info]boeticia - Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 04:15 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: LIVE FREE OR DIE - [info]boeticia - Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 04:35 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: LIVE FREE OR DIE - [info]unclegeek - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 06:49 am (UTC) Expand
Re: LIVE FREE OR DIE - [info]boeticia - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 08:36 am (UTC) Expand
LIAR
[info]wemadeamistake wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 01:09 pm (UTC)
Not a single mention of his pathological lying and his narcissist character. "There won't be any lobbyists in my White House". [He has five in his cabinet] "Illegals will not get health care." [He is working behind the scenes on Amnesty which will not only provide free health care, but will guarantee social security, free college tuition, no fines.....and in exchange, President Liar gets their votes.
Re: LIAR
[info]snotcricket wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 02:49 pm (UTC)
We've had that 'T' shirt for the last 12 years.
OMG
[info]michiganjen wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 01:38 pm (UTC)
Yet another piece of MSM drivel designed to prop up your Messiah. This is exactly why readers and viewers are fleeing the MSM in droves... nearly everything in this piece flies in the face of what we KNOW is actually happening with the Obama presidency because we read alternative news sources that don't hide things that look bad for the president.

There are so many inaccuracies, I don't even know where to begin. That 'spirit of bipartisanship' that you claim Obama (according to his campaign speeches) brings to the table is completely non-existent. It is a fact that Obama refused to meet with any Republicans for MONTHS early this summer when the Dems were busy crafting the first edition of healthcare reform. And the reason only one Republican signed on is because all conservatives rightly recognize that the government cannot run any program efficiently, so we aren't about to entrust 1/6th of the US economy to them.

Obama not a vengeful man? Conciliatory? Creates an atmosphere of no fear? Sir, if you actually believe this, you are obviously not a conservative living in Obama's new America of Hope and Change. Over the last 8 months, I have repeatedly heard this President and his right-hand Democrat leaders of Congress call me a nazi, un-American, a neanderthal, astroturf, and I was even labeled 'the enemy' by Obama himself. This White House under Obama has set up an email account and has asked regular American citizens to spy on and report other regular American citizens for their 'fishy emails and casual conversations' that go against the Democratic party line on healthcare. This President has instructed me to 'shut up and get out of the way' and accuses me of hating America simply because I disagree with him and his policies. For all of Bush's faults, he never once used the power of his office to marginalize, malign, and demonize fully half of the electorate simply for daring to disagree with him.

And I won't even touch on the fact that this conciliatory, non-vengeful man has gone after the one, the lone ONE, news network that isn't showering him with all the love and affection he so needs.

It is a very scary time to be a conservative in Obama's America, but you sure wouldn't know it by reading the 'hope-and-change' love story put forward by this and other news outlets. Can you really be THAT clueless?
Re: OMG
[info]frase33 wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 08:51 pm (UTC)
Well said....LYING mainstream media, your credibility is shot.
millions are waking up daily to the fraud and treason that is taking place....
The Global Elite, Bilderberg group, and truth of 9/11 that the media are too scared to even talk about.
Instead they are ACCESSORIES to MURDER...
Obama is a fraud.
A global crime syndicate of elite people has seized control of the planet and is taking us to hell.....
WAKE UP!!
Re: OMG - [info]oldfloyd - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 08:47 am (UTC) Expand
Obama: Twelve months
[info]hankvreeland wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 01:43 pm (UTC)
It is day number 285.

What has this administration accomplished?

Pass the question on.
Not vengeful?
[info]oldfloyd wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 01:52 pm (UTC)
Boy, you can sure recognize this was written by an Independent columnist.
I suppose the writer thinks that an openly jihad against Fox News, The U.S. Chamber of Comerce, and the insurance industry...all for daring to publish rebuttals to Obama's plans, does not constitute a petty, vengeful, thin-skinned little man?
This guy relishes harming ANYONE he does not like.
Witness how he sent his goons out to illegally dig around in the private records of a private citizen not even remotely involved in politics.
That man was Joe "The Plumber" Wurzlebacher.
This man is not a president.
He is Al Capone minus the scar and with darker pigmentation.
Re: Not vengeful?
[info]boeticia wrote:
Friday, 30 October 2009 at 04:53 am (UTC)
Be careful, your racist slip is showing.
Re: Not vengeful? - [info]oldfloyd - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 07:42 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Not vengeful? - [info]boeticia - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 08:57 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Not vengeful? - [info]oldfloyd - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 10:27 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Not vengeful? - [info]alheimstead - Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 06:51 am (UTC) Expand
Back to Earth
[info]had_it wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 01:52 pm (UTC)
Yeah! We gave him a loaf of bread and three fishes and how many did he feed?
Re: Back to Earth
[info]frase33 wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 08:55 pm (UTC)
hahah
Brilliant
Sheep in a herd/cult following ooooo baaaaaaaaa maaaaaaa
His administration is, in fact, in disarray
[info]lrothbiester wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 01:52 pm (UTC)
"Not getting the Olympics for Chicago doesn't count. Nor is his administration in disarray or anything close to it. (Mr Clinton had barely arrived in office before he was instantly engulfed in mini-scandals.)"

This simply isn't true. Just because Obama's own mini-scandals aren't afforded the same media attention as Clinton's were doesn't mean they're not happening - to wit,

1. Henry Louis Gates
2. Van Jones
3. ACORN
4. Anita Dunn
5. Bitchy swipes at Fox News

How do these blemishes compare to Clinton's troubles from Jan-Oct '93?

1. Zoe Baird
2. HillaryCare
3. Travelgate
4. Vince Foster
5. Mogadishu

[Whitewater and Paula Jones = Jan and May '94 respectively.]

I contend that American journalism, while barely able in the Clinton era to fulfill meaningfully its obligations as the Fourth Estate, is by now so utterly and brazenly partisan that Obama's transgressions have been spun virtually out of existence: further, they are surely more fundamentally damaging to American society than Clinton's "mini-scandals."
Re: His administration is, in fact, in disarray
[info]alheimstead wrote:
Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 06:55 am (UTC)
Heck, Obama's list goes on and on for days. Obama's list makes Clinton's list, look like a baby.
Obama
[info]ac7880 wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 01:59 pm (UTC)
This is not just a Republican fightback - you have missed the point entirely! This is a lashback for failing to deliver on campaign promises. This is a lashback for attempting a far left socialist agenda way beyond what he campaigned on. This is a lashback for leaving our your service mebers hanging by a thread while he dithers about on Afghanistan - where he said in his campaign he would kick butt, versus Iraq which he said was wrong. It is lashback for voting present on healthcare - and leaving it to congress instead of leading the charge!

Obama looked strong in campaign mode - now he looks and acts weak. I am sorry I ever voted him - Hillary would have done more!
Re: Obama
[info]lrothbiester wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 02:40 pm (UTC)
All of the signs were there from the beginning; if you'd been paying attention you would've seen them.
Re: Obama - [info]alheimstead - Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 07:05 am (UTC) Expand
Obama: Twelve months on, the star falls back to earth
[info]cliftonjack wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 02:04 pm (UTC)
"That is just what happened in both New Jersey and Virginia back in 1993 before the Republicans seized control of the US Congress
the following year, dealing a crippling blow to the newly minted Democratic president of the time, Bill Clinton." Well, yes it is just what happened but some historians now claim that it also saved the Clinton presidency and enabled him to run for a second term and win. A problem with united government is that each side sees itself superior to the other and there is no need for negotiations because both are literally in charge. When one side is of another party, they must get along, they must negotiate. In short, the nation is best run when there are branches on each side of the tree, not on the same side.
Obama the Naive
[info]cranky1 wrote:
Thursday, 29 October 2009 at 02:06 pm (UTC)
"The debate has also exposed what some now see as a naivety in Obama's candidature: his dream of creating a new spirit of bi-partisanship in Washington has hardly come to pass."

Oh yeah, that Barack Obama...he's such a fragile flower. Considering that we can't get the people of Des Moines to understand this man, I suppose it's not fair to hold the people of the UK to a higher standard.

Barack Obama is a Chicago-styled politician. There is nothing nuanced, naive or gentle about him. He cracks skulls and asks questions later. Or rather, he has Rahm Emanuel do it for him.

For the life of me, I don't get the British love affair with him. He hates you guys for what you did to his Grandfather in Kenya and he intends to make you pay for it. Just as the US is to pay for EVERYTHING that ever went wrong in the world - EVER. And when his temper tantrum is over, the Republicans (sans the Bush family, we pray) will be left to pick up the mess. Who's going to pick up the UK's mess when he's done with you?
Re: Obama the Naive
[info]boeticia wrote:
Friday, 30 October 2009 at 05:06 am (UTC)
This must be Hate-Obama Club's Day. No wonder your new President has such a difficult time tidying up your once-
great nation. The mood, the hate, the spite and nastiness in your - and your friend's comments here, reminds everyone of how it must have been in the good old Wild West lynching days - not too long ago, think of it!
Re: Obama the Naive - [info]oldfloyd - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 07:50 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Obama the Naive - [info]boeticia - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 09:06 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Obama the Naive - [info]oldfloyd - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 10:24 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Obama the Naive - [info]cranky1 - Friday, 30 October 2009 at 12:44 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Obama the Naive - [info]alheimstead - Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 10:12 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Obama the Naive - [info]boeticia - Sunday, 1 November 2009 at 05:20 pm (UTC) Expand
Page 1 of 6
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] >>

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date