Obama's plan to shame Republicans in TV debate
President honours transparency pledge in change of healthcare tactics
Bring in the cameras, turn on the lights and perhaps the ever-squabbling politicians on Capitol Hill can be shamed into getting things moving again on overhauling America's astronomic healthcare system.
That, at least, is the latest gambit of President Barack Obama who has invited Democrats and Republicans to take part in a half-day summit on reviving the push for healthcare reform which he himself will host at the White House on 25 February and which, crucially, will be televised live. Faced with a slow crumbling of his top domestic priority since the surprise win last month of Republican Scott Brown in the race for Teddy Kennedy's old US Senate seat, Mr Obama issued the invitation in an interview with CBS News's Katie Couric before Sunday night's Super Bowl game.
It is partly a response to criticism that in dealing with healthcare Mr Obama has so far fumbled one of his key election campaign promises – to make things more transparent in Washington. Last year's tortuous negotiations were characterised by closed-door deal-making and concession-swapping. The healthcare push also made a mockery of his pledge to bring a new spirit of bipartisanship to Washington.
But something else is at play. Mr Obama got high marks after a late-January televised meeting with Republican members of Congress when he took questions and vigorously challenged them to take a constructive part in the healthcare debate. Once again, he is trying to make it harder for the Republicans just to sustain their rejectionist stance of the last 12 months without offering something positive.
"I want to consult closely with our Republican colleagues," he told Couric. "What I want to do is to ask them to put their ideas on the table... I want to come back and have a large meeting, Republicans and Democrats, to go through, systematically, all the best ideas that are out there and move it forward."
The calling of the summit also sets a deadline for the Democrats to fathom a way of passing some kind of reform package even though the win by Mr Brown robbed them of the super-majority in the Senate that protected them from the threat of Republican filibusters. This could involve the House essentially passing roughly the same package of reforms that was approved by the Senate on Christmas Eve.
Republicans will now also be under pressure to come up with alternative proposals, although officials at the White House yesterday indicated that Mr Obama had no intention of starting from scratch again as some have suggested. "This is not starting over," one official said. "Don't make any mistake about that. We are coming with our plan. They can bring their plan."
While Mr Obama's goals remain the same – expanding insurance coverage to those without it and lowering premiums – the scope of reform is certain to narrow if compromise is to be reached. Recently, the President has taken to speaking not of "healthcare reform" but, rather, "health insurance reform".
The latest evidence of rising costs – a shocking 39 per cent rise in premiums by major California health insurer Anthem Blue Cross – was cited by Mr Obama. "That's a portrait of the future if we don't do something now," he said. "It's going to keep beating down on families, small businesses, large businesses, it's going to be a huge drain on the economy. We're going to have to do something about it."
There is little doubt the Republicans will attend the summit; whether they will move off their obstructionist position on reform remains to be seen. Mitch McConnell, the Senate Minority Leader, said he welcomed "the opportunity to share ideas with the President," adding: "We know there are a number of issues with bipartisan support that we can start with when the 2,700-page bill is put on the shelf."
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited



Comments
Interesting, healthcare is an American disgrace and the Republicans don't seem to have any ideas, I also doubt that they will have anyone smarter than Obama. Will they step up to the mark with something positive, or will they be the sullen party of "No"!
Ps. Obama is not that smart, as long as he has a teleprompter he preaches like a baptist minister, without it he gets in trouble, do a search on youtube for Obama speech gaffs, they are hilarious and they will make you think twice about his intellect.
Pss. One little hint that Obama seems to have missed, it's the economy and jobs that are tanking his poll numbers and is the number 1 concern of the voters--not health care. But Obama knows better, I just hope he realizes soon before we waste another year.
Whine? me? I don't have to, I live in the UK, where we have an a proper health service and can go private by choice if we wish to waste our money! The system is brilliant, I've never had to wait or pay for treatment, never even thought of having a policy or worried about expense. The only thing I worry about is the bad influence and the lying and cheating the American rich do to increase their profits and influence. The lies told about the health systems in Europe amaze me. Sure if you go looking you can find someone who is unsatisfied out of millions who have been treated, but that doesn't mean our systems don't work. You won't find demonstrations about health care in other more civilized countries, only in the third world American system built and managed for the benefit of lawyers and fat cats who can't wait to exploit people abroad if they could. The right wing media in America is full of lies and pushes fear to influence politics.
Sure Obama might need a teleprompter, so what? I never saw a snake oil salesmen with a teleprompter? What on earth has a teleprompter to do with intelligence? It just says to me that he is prepared and wants to do it right. I wouldn't expect a soldier to be called a wussy for using a gun, so why is a politican called for using his equipment well.
As for the economy? What is it with you people? Economies don't collapse instantly a guy steps up to a job. Well not unless he's been sabotaged by a carefully prepared trap. Economies can't be fixed instantly. as long as the Right ship jobs abroad, flood the American with cheap goods from China and put the nation on welfare then nothing will work. Now you've lost the motor industry because you prefered to drive oversize tanks that no one else in the world would buy, you've sold out health care to the lawyers and rich medics, you fight wars in every country in the world over resources, your food industry is ruining home cooking and making you all ill, and still you don't get it? You are being shafted by the rich, who don't live amongst you and float across the globe to where the pickings are easy. I guess you don't even know that Fox News and Sky are owned by an Australian, Rupert Murdoch who floats around the world with his Chinese wife, happy to sell lies and junk TV that pleases the rich wherever he operates... It's money they want, they don't care about the USA or Europe, ultimately the world is dominated by rich traitors, not college professors but business, dumb and rich beyond anything you can imagine, still greedy for more!
I would also ask them how and why they think that doing the wrong thing is going to benefit them in the longterm. Edwards and Clinton discovered this with their pro-war votes before the election and it clearly didn't help them out. You can't have it both ways. You do the right thing and it helps us all. They need to forget their constant appeal to the tea bagger minority and the Fox News pundits. Lives are on the line - what part of that statement don't then understand?
The ONLY thing the average Republican cares about is regaining their lost seats and they are doing it at the expense of the population with the backing of wealthy corporations and sadly the scared uneducated populace.
It breaks my heart because my faith in the U.S was reborn after Obama's election; it never ever occurred to me that after voters had elected their president, members of the opposing party would hold the welfare of the nation captive in the name of democracy. Sad, sad, sad.
How can anyone still hold a microphone in front of Palin and honestly ask for her opinion on anything of significance?
The woman defected in her role of Governor of Alaska and she is still allowed to give her opinion and pawn books? Only in America :). If she was in the military, she'd be in jail. And she has aspirations to be commander in chief one day? WoooooW!
The election of Obama did two thing, it shows people will only wake up and care about who they vote into office when the issues of poverty and uncertainty comes to their own backyard.
Secondly, it shows racism is very well and alive in America and it crosses all economic statuses. From Tom Tancredo who made the comment “People who could not spell the word vote or say it in English put a committed socialist ideologue in the White House — name is Barack Hussein Obama,” to the intelligence challenged tea part activists miss representing Tom Jefferson's quote of “the tree of liberty must occasionally be watered with blood". Isn't that a scary thought for 2010?!
How can a group complain and filibuster something as crucial as health care that impacts sooo many people, for over a year, saying they are doing so because they haven’t been heard only to complain and claim entrapment when they are offered the floor to let their ideas be know loud and clear in the face of people who they work for – the voters?
Is this Democracy?!