Republicans turn on Bush to end plans for Dubai firm's ports deal
Friday 10 March 2006
Latest in Americas
On Facebook
From the blogs
CC kills more people than cervical cancer; why haven’t we heard about it?
There is a disease whose incidence is rising in the UK and most of the industrialised world. However...
We need to avoid another ‘lost generation’
A tiny green shoot one day, and then a chill wind the next. Anyone hoping for signs of economic spr...
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
In a stinging reverse to President George Bush, an Arab-owned company has bowed to overwhelming opposition in Congress and dropped its plan, previously strongly backed by the White House, to run six major US ports.
The announcement by Dubai Ports World (DPW) came hours after top Congressional Republican leaders told Mr Bush yesterday that the deal was heading for certain defeat in the House of Representatives and the Senate.
The private meeting took place almost at the very moment that the White House spokesman Scott McClellan was reiterating that the President would veto any bill that barred the take-over - where management of the ports would pass from Britain's P&0 into the hands of DPW, controlled by the government of the United Arab Emirates.
The confrontation - the climax of the biggest revolt by his own party since Mr Bush entered the White House - followed Wednesday's stunning 62-2 vote by a key House committee passing an amendment blocking the transaction.
Making matters even more uncomfortable for Mr Bush, the amendment was tacked on to a crucial measure providing $71bn (£36bn) of emergency funding for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, whose combined cost is running at $7bn a month, as well as $19bn of relief for the hurricane-battered US Gulf Coast.
The White House was left with an impossible choice, between a showdown in Congress it was bound to lose, and a climbdown that would have Mr Bush eating words he spoke less than a fortnight ago. He would have been forced to explain to an already hostile Muslim world, why British management of the ports was acceptable, while Arab management was not.
As it is, the fact that the UAE company itself withdrew has provided only the barest fig-leaf for the President's humiliation. DPW last night said it would transfer operations at the six ports to "a US entity".
- 1 Ninety gaffes in ninety years
- 2 Cameron's 'drunk tanks' are dangerous, say police
- 3 Can you master a language in a weekend?
- 4 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 7 Russian youth group outlives its usefulness
- 1 Ninety gaffes in ninety years
- 2 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Rangers future could be bright says administrator
- 5 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 6 MP faces charges over Nazi stag night
- 7 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
- 8 No secularism please, we're British
- 9 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 10 Lightning kills an entire football team
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
How an abortion divided America
Did they all live happily ever after? That's up to you...




Comments