The American Dream? Not for all the pilgrims
Thousands returned within a few years of crossing the Atlantic, academic reveals
The American Dream was fading almost before it began, says a study which shows a quarter of all pilgrims gave up on the New World to return to Britain.
The harsh realities of life in 17th-century Massachusetts, where disease was rife, the climate unforgiving and the economy stagnant for long periods, forced thousands to make the treacherous three-month voyage back across the Atlantic within a few years of arriving.
Dr Susan Hardman Moore, of the University of Edinburgh's School of Divinity, has painstakingly researched the immigration records of ordinary people who fled religious persecution before the English Civil War, along with their wills, diaries and letters. Her book, Pilgrims: New World Settlers and the Call of Home, estimates that up to 20,000 people set sail across the Atlantic during the 1630s and 1640s as the country was torn apart by political and religious differences under Charles I.
Those who remained in America set about building a powerful national story which fuelled notions of Manifest Destiny and helped turn the country into the world's greatest superpower, but the vast numbers who quit have long been underplayed by historians. Among those to sail back to Britain were significant sections of the colony's elite, including a third of religious ministers and half of the graduates from the newly established Harvard University.
"This is a story that has been overlooked on the whole by Americans who prefer to focus attention on the onward march of United States' history," Dr Hardman Moore said. "My book, in a quiet way, undercuts some of the grand American mythology of a city on a hill that everyone is going to look up to as a beacon."
But it was not just conditions in their adopted home that fuelled the return exodus, Dr Harman Moore says. The execution of the fiercely anti-Puritan Archbishop Laud signalled a sea change in religious attitudes in the home country, and Oliver Cromwell's new regime offered new openings for adventurers, particularly those ideologically committed to the Puritan cause. Their presence helped reinforce garrisons of Cromwell's forces from Cornwall to Scotland at a time when English Presbyterians were less than keen to engage in the brutal business of suppression.
"Cromwell's new regime needed a huge number of people to run it so there were a lot of new opportunities in employment, at a time when in New England there aren't that many jobs because immigration and expansion has dried up," said Dr Hardman Moore. "England, Scotland and Ireland offered better opportunities."
Crossing the Atlantic was a major undertaking even for those who felt their actions were determined by God. Apart from the obvious dangers of shipwreck and prospect of long months of sea-sickness, many borrowed heavily to make the voyage, which cost the equivalent of a year's income for a craftsman.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
But British expat do not hold the first place for settlement within North Americas. Nearly sixty years before the Pilgrims landed on Plymouth Rock, Spanish children played upon the much sunnier sandy shores of North Florida at St. Augustine. The Spanish (mostly Minorcans) had the good sense to settle in a milder climate. The British sought to replicate the miserable weather they left behind in England. Today's Brits are much wiser. They can be found en-mass in the Florida of today.
It always provides a laugh at Brits who continually have a hard-on for all that America has achieved. Yes, without doubt, it is definitely penis envy. I liked her attack on America and its 'city on a hill' and it being a beacon. She's hoping that providing Anti-American slander will endear her to those who seek to find fault with the country in which I reside. In truth it has been a beacon for many. Hardman Moore is obviously promoting her book, which I believe will provide few revelations from what has previously been written about the Pilgrim's saga.
Her comments in this story points toward areas of inaccuracy. Manifest Destiny wasn't even thought of at the time of the Pilgrim's arrival on American shores. What lay beyond in the West of America was still a mystery, unknown. There was no thought of separation from the mother country by these early colonists, they were loyal but disalussioned British subjects. The colony of Massachusetts was and would remain a British colony for more than a hundred and fifty years.
This is a book that I won't bother reading.
The article itself mentions that only 1/4 of the original pilgrims returned home, so I'm not sure a 25% return can be considered overwhelming rejection of whatever notion of the 'American Dream' Dr Harden believes those at that time subscribed to.