The four most important televised debates in US presidential history
Known for his commentary on international relations and US politics, Rupert Cornwell also contributes obituaries and occasionally even a column for the sports pages. With The Independent since its launch in 1986, he was the paper's first Moscow correspondent - covering the collapse of the Soviet Union – during which time he won two British Press Awards. Previously a foreign correspondent for the Financial Times and Reuters, he has also been a diplomatic correspondent, leader writer and columnist, and has served as Washington bureau editor. In 1983 he published God's Banker, about Roberto Calvi, the Italian banker found hanging from Blackfriars Bridge.
Tuesday 02 October 2012
Televised debates have been around for more than half a century. Rarely
do they alone determine an election’s result. But they can shift a campaign’s
momentum and seal an impression of a candidate in voters’ minds. Here are four
of the most important.
1. The 1960 debates between John F Kennedy and Richard Nixon were the first of their kind, and among the most important. Television was still a relatively new medium, but JFK was a natural. Those who listened on the radio to the first debate – invariably the most important – considered Nixon the winner. Those (far more numerous) who saw it on TV found the cool young Democrat more personable and persuasive than his better known and more experienced opponent, a two term Vice President. Without the TV debates, Kennedy might not have won the election.
2. The next debates were not until 1976, between Gerald Ford and his Democratic challenger Jimmy Carter. The second of them, dealing with foreign policy, was an example of a blunder that probably did change a race. Ford’s claim that “there is no Soviet domination of Eastern Europe and there never will be under a Ford administration,” was an especially glaring mistake, coming as it did from an incumbent president. By the time of the debate, Ford had virtually erased Carter’s earlier big lead. Thereafter, his momentum stalled and Carter went on to a narrow win in November.
3. The lone 1980 encounter between Carter and Ronald Reagan was a debate that sealed the deal – though not because of any particular piece of brilliance on Reagan’s part, or ineptitude on Carter’s. The latter was already struggling, burdened by a dismal economy and the Iran hostage crisis, but many voters still feared Reagan was a dangerous right wing fanatic who should not be entrusted with the Oval Office. His smooth and re-assuring performance (“There you go again,” he gently chided Carter at one point) largely dispelled those doubts. Reagan never looked back, and went on to win by a landslide.
4. The limited impact of debates was proved in 2004, when George W Bush sought re-election, faced by Democratic Senator John Kerry. Going into the debates, the president had a small advantage in the polls, but Kerry performed strongly in all three, especially the first on foreign policy where he outshone Mr Bush. But no matter that he seemed more ‘presidential,’ and with a much better command of the facts, and that most post-debate surveys deemed him the ‘winner.’ Bush won when it mattered most on 2 November, with 50.7 per cent of the popular vote against Kerry’s 48.3 per cent.
- 1 If you weren't afraid of flying before last week... you probably are now
- 2 Israel-Gaza conflict: The secret report that helps Israelis to hide facts
- 3 Students offered grants if they tweet pro-Israeli propaganda
- 4 Lauren Goodger calls for tougher laws on revenge porn after sex tape leaks online
- 5 Iraq crisis: End 'very near' for Christianity after Isis takeover, says Bishop
Israel-Gaza conflict: The secret report that helps Israelis to hide facts
A day in the life of Vladimir Putin: The dictator in his labyrinth
Opponents of Israel's military operation in Gaza are the real enemies of Middle Eastern peace
Arizona execution lasts two hours as killer Joseph Wood left 'snorting and gasping' for air
Were 'Poor Doors' added to mixed developments so wealthy residents don't have to go in alongside social housing tenants?
Malaysia Airlines MH17 crash: Massive rise in sale of British arms to Russia
£30000 per annum: Ashdown Group: A highly reputable software house is looking ...
£40000 - £45000 per annum: Ashdown Group: An established professional services...
Highly Attractive Salary: Austen Lloyd: CITY - SENIOR COMMERCIAL LITIGATION SO...
£35000 - £40000 per annum + competitive: Progressive Recruitment: My client is...