World

7° London Hi 11°C / Lo 6°C

5,000 days in captivity: The world's most famous political prisoner and a dismal landmark

Burma's leaders hoped the world would forget about the detained opposition leader. But her influence and support are a potent threat to the military regime – and it refused the UN Secretary General permission to meet her last week

By Andrew Buncombe

Suu Kyi is said to be frustrated by the role of the UN envoy, who has been accused of appeasement

AFP

Ms Suu Kyi is being held in prison, having been charged with violating the terms of her house arrest

Today, like most days, Aung San Suu Kyi will sit and wait. She will spend the day with the two women she has been detained with since 2003. That she is being held in a "guesthouse" in the grounds of Rangoon's Insein jail, as opposed to her lakeside house where she has spent the past six years, makes little difference; she has no television, radio or phone. But today is special, and for the most dismal of reasons. It is the 5,000th day of her incarceration.

Ms Suu Kyi is being held at the prison, having been charged with violating the terms of her house arrest after a mysterious American swam to her home and spent the night there. In truth, the only crime committed by the graceful opposition leader was to win an election two decades ago. Even now, the junta is terrified that this slight 64-year-old widow has the power to do something they have never been able to do: lead and unite the people of Burma without the threat of force. That is why she is kept a prisoner, out of sight but never out of mind.

Yesterday, in a move that underlined the regime's fear about Ms Suu Kyi's latent power, the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon was refused permission to speak with her. On a controversial visit to Burma to try to convince Senior General Than Shwe to release more than 2,000 political prisoners and restart dialogue with the opposition, Mr Ban said his request for a meeting with Ms Suu Kyi had been turned down. "I pressed as hard as I could. I had hoped that he would agree to my request, but it is regrettable that he did not," he told reporters. "I am deeply disappointed that they have missed a very important opportunity."

The high-profile snub came after the UN head had initially asked General Than Shwe for a meeting with the detained opposition leader during two hours of talks on Friday evening in the remote administrative capital, Naypyitaw. He was made to wait overnight for the decision and was then told that a meeting would be impossible because the opposition leader's trial was ongoing.

As he last night left Burma empty-handed, having met with foreign ambassadors in Rangoon, the Secretary General faced renewed criticism from campaigners and members of the international community – Britain among them – who believed that he should not have gone. Many warned that by coming away with nothing, Mr Ban was merely providing the regime with a propaganda coup.

Yet others were not surprised, not least by the generals' decision not to allow him to visit Ms Suu Kyi, whose National League for Democracy (NLD) won a landslide election victory in 1990 only for the result to be ignored by the junta. It was at that time that the opposition leader was first imprisoned, for a period of three years. She was later awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.

Since then she has spent almost 14 of the past 19 years under house arrest, the world's most prominent political prisoner. On occasion, the junta has made clear it would release her if she agreed to leave Burma but she has always chosen to remain a part of her country's struggle. In 1999, while temporarily free, she faced the dilemma of whether to visit her dying husband, the British academic Michael Aris, who had prostate cancer and who was refused a visa to enter Burma. Fearful that if she left she would never be allowed to return, she stayed in Burma without seeing her husband again. "Since we live in this world, we have to do our best for this world," she once told an interviewer.

Those are typically brave words from a woman whose life has been blighted by political opponents almost from the start. She was a mere toddler in 1948 when her father, who had negotiated Burma's independence from Britain a year earlier, was assassinated. The mantle of the country's democracy movement passed eventually to her mother, and then – after her graduation from Oxford, postgraduate studies at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London, and time spent working for the UN – to her.

Mark Farmaner, of the Burma Campaign UK, said the reason for her continued detention was very simple. In a country that has been brutalised by violence and the fear of violence, ordinary people will still, in private, whisper about the "the lady" and how she could help fix their broken land.

"It might be one of the most brutal dictatorships in the world but they are terrified of this one woman," he added. "They hoped by keeping her detained the world would forget about Burma, but the opposite has happened. The fact that she has now spent 5,000 days in detention should shame world leaders who have tolerated this situation."

The current charges against Ms Suu Kyi were brought in May after John Yettaw, a 53-year-old Vietnam veteran, swam across Rangoon's Inya Lake to her home. Apparently, the opposition leader was not pleased by the intrusion – realising what it would mean for her – but let him sleep on the floor. Her supporters later complained to the authorities about the breakdown in security at her supposedly heavily guarded home.

After she was charged with breaching the terms of her house arrest, her supporters claimed that the regime was using the incident as an excuse to keep her locked up until after an election is held next year. The planned election has been widely condemned as a sham that will do nothing other than cement the regime's control, and the NLD is to boycott proceedings.

Aung Din, a former political prisoner who now heads the US Campaign for Burma, said the regime believes that by holding the election it will be seen as a legitimate government by the international community. "It is extremely important for the regime that its crony candidates should secure almost all of seats to be contested in the election.

"[Ms Suu Kyi] is the serious and major obstacle for the regime to achieve its objective. If she is released, she will be able to revive the NLD and organise the people to stand up together for positive changes... That's why the regime is trying to extend her detention."

Of course, Ms Suu Kyi is just the best known of an estimated 2,000 or more political prisoners being held by the regime. Many of these were rounded up in the aftermath of pro-democracy demonstrations in the summer and autumn of 2007, when hundreds of thousands of ordinary people and Buddhist monks marched through the streets of Burma's biggest cities calling for change.

Members of a group of activists called the 88 Generation Students Group were imprisoned for up to 65 years. A monk who had helped organise the protest, Ashin Gambira, was jailed for a similar period. In a deliberate effort to make their jail terms more harsh, they have been sent to prisons away from Rangoon, making it harder for their families to visit.

Over the years, the conditions of Ms Suu Kyi's imprisonment have changed. Once she occupied herself playing the piano and was permitted visits from diplomats. But in recent years, the terms have been tightened and now the only visits are with her lawyer, occasional meetings with senior members of her party and a supposedly regular, but often blocked, check-up from her doctor. She did not even learn of Mr Ban's visit to Burma and his request to meet her until her lawyer informed her last Thursday.

Despite her isolation from ordinary Burmese people, the power she holds remains obvious. In September 2007, at the height of the protests, a group of monks marched to her house to pay their respects. Earlier this year, Agga, one of those monks, described the moment when Ms Suu Kyi emerged from her house.

"We tried to talk with her but there were soldiers between her and ourselves. She seemed to be so sad, she seemed to have tears in her eyes," said the monk, who has fled Burma and is now living in the US. "Then the monks gave respect to her as if she was their mother.

"It was strange to see her, but we were very happy to see her."

Countdown to custody: Nobel prize winner and political prisoner

January 1948 Burma becomes independent

September 1987 Currency devaluation wipes out many people's savings and triggers anti-government riots

July 1989 The ruling junta declares martial law. National League for Democracy (NLD) leader Aung San Suu Kyi is put under house arrest

May 1990 The NLD wins parliamentary elections in a landslide. The junta ignores the result

October 1991 Ms Suu Kyi wins Nobel Peace Prize

July 1995 She is released from house arrest

May 2003 She is taken into "protective custody" after clashes between supporters on both sides

September 2007 Buddhist monks hold a series of anti-government protests

April 2008 Government publishes proposed new constitution, which allocates a quarter of seats in parliament to the military. It also bans Ms Suu Kyi from holding office

May 2009 John William Yettaw visits the dissident leader at her house. Government charges her with violating the terms of her detention

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Freedom
[info]yambas wrote:
Saturday, 4 July 2009 at 11:31 pm (UTC)
The main reason this despicable regime survives is help from China,India and Thailand.These are the countries that need our condemnation.
Re: Freedom
[info]topolcats wrote:
Sunday, 5 July 2009 at 02:06 am (UTC)
Question for you Mr Yambas.
Is this despicable regime, worse or better in relation to other despicable regimes that the West uses as lackey states?
For example Giorgia, Ukraine, Albania,Columbia, Congo, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Afghanistan?
The list is long.
Before the West can throw stones,one might suggest to remove the hypocrisy first.
If the generals were pro American, on the balance of probabilities they would be highly supported by the very same imperialists you say need your condemnation.
Re: Freedom
[info]yambas wrote:
Sunday, 5 July 2009 at 05:53 am (UTC)
Agree,but the subject was Burma.
Re: Freedom
[info]brazil2009 wrote:
Sunday, 5 July 2009 at 08:02 pm (UTC)
Why is that when people discuss one thing, people come up with something else; yes, somehow related to the subject matter but still not quite the same thing,TOPOLCATS ?
I have seen this happening so many times that makes me wonder what's going on. It works like this:"OK, you don't like red because of this, but pink and panther are just as bad for the same reason. What do you have to say about that?Humm?" The list is long and I should not be annoyed by something so non important and I am not, but would really like to get an explanation for that matter because at times like that, my 29 year old of age feels like a 100 years on each shoulder.Don't take offense,please,I would like to understand that and that's all.And by the way, all the Countries you mentioned may well have people who are as wonderful and brave as Ms Suu Kyi, but the matter of the fact here is her predicament and the future of her Country,Burma.I understand too that you are very well informed. I think that better informed than myself about world affairs. But when things like that happen(not your case), the impression given is that people just want to belittle the situation and that they have some odd agenda... I had a look at your other comment and have a question for you: Have you ever seen a military regime where the generals were not paranoid about something? It is their mindset, that is how their minds work. Why? No idea, I did my best to avoid conscription when I was 17 going 18 and happy to inform you I did succeed in doing so.
The UN should be replaced!
[info]nooraza wrote:
Sunday, 5 July 2009 at 07:30 am (UTC)
There must be a new international law to indict these monsters, including Islamist ones, who are racist, facsist and sexist, to the Hague! Even if Nato has to invade these countries; but not to bring war, justs to capture these evil leaders! Or at least make sure that regimes that are supporting them, that include the Chinese or Russian regimes, can also be put on trial! Ms. Suu Kyi is indeed the bravest lady on earth he could hav elived so comfortbaly in the West, but she chosed to sacrifice her life for her people (but in peaceful ways)! She's equal to Mahatma Ghandi! Maybe there should be a massive concert/protest in the West for her; that will keep up her peaceful Ghandian struggle alive!
The worlds press eye candy- a lackey in waiting
[info]topolcats wrote:
Sunday, 5 July 2009 at 10:15 am (UTC)
There is an interview, article, very well put in respect to the mindset of the ruling generals in Myanmar put eloquently by Mr Thant Myint-U grandson U Thant, former two-term United Nations secretary general from 1961 to 1971 on http://atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/KG04Ae01.html
I suggest readers peruse this article.
In this article it would seem The generals are totally paranoid about western powers retaking it as colonial zone of slavery as it was under the past. And for this reason Aung San Suu Kyi is extremely dangerous for stability in that region. One assumes being married to a Brit she holds dual or at least the right to dual citizenship which certainly can lead to undue influence by the UK and America in tandem if ever she took over.
This would most likely mean the rape of the country by foreign corporations and certainly an armed military presence on the borders of China and near India, perhaps these military bases could be nuke armed platforms, which China among other would never allow. This means more wars and plenty of dead Burmese. further her judgment cannot be trusted having seen her reaction to a nut job American Christian crusader. She must never for the sake of the Burmese people be allowed to take power. There must be other options other than a marionette who has proven herself not strong enough to lead Myanmar. A middle ground is needed, other than that option, the only other possibility is for the west to entertain dialogue with the generals to make Myanmar more democratic-in short engagement, lifting sanctions . But to insist Suu Kyi, a lackey, along with her movement, who are there simply to takes bribes from foreign powers, is a no brainier. it will never happen.
Re: The worlds press eye candy- a lackey in waiting
[info]ydef wrote:
Sunday, 5 July 2009 at 03:35 pm (UTC)
Ah, so the mask drops and you spill your true colors. So in effect you're stating your agreement with U Thant, whom you even claim as 'paranoid', buying his stilted vision of the world and the 'threat' of Suu Kyi of being a lackey of foreign powers? Surely you jest.
Re: The worlds press eye candy- a lackey in waiting
[info]topolcats wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 02:34 am (UTC)
There was never any mask to drop. This is my thought on seeing Press poster girls and boys from South Africa to the Philippines and the aftermath of the propaganda when they actually take over, such as Yuchhenko of the Ukraine. I was also in Russia during the transition. When the West was championing Gorbachev and Yeltsin, what they were really doing was selling the country. I am please they were deposed and hated in Russia. I suspect the same here. But to get a clear view you need to be on the ground in Myanmar. I will be there this year, after that theory's can be substantiated .
Re: The worlds press eye candy- a lackey in waiting
[info]brazil2009 wrote:
Sunday, 5 July 2009 at 08:43 pm (UTC)
I am really happy that I do need to inform you TOPOLCATS that I have changed my mind about you being better informed than me where world affairs concerned.It is pretty obvious,you are so not. And make me happy and do take offense. Sometimes it is just ludicrous being nice to people who lack this and that. You do know what this and that means in this context,TOPOLCATS? Your choice may well be Indy but with certainty,your opinion is not Independent . Besides your Independent mind .I am sure it is powered by natural ecological fuel: Cat's faeces.And that's very modern and very Green of you. Congratulations!! How do you get it in, it's none of my business.
Re: The worlds press eye candy- a lackey in waiting
[info]topolcats wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 02:53 am (UTC)
All I can say to you is save some money and go to Burma, then as I will when I arrive know the true situation. Merely believing propaganda is not likely to sway a person like myself. Nelson Mandela was sold just like her in the foreign press-he is great yes, that did not help South Africa much in the end. I have been to South Africa in my view that revolution on many grounds was a fraud. He sold out to be honest to corporate powers and what is south Africa today? Probably one of the most dangerous hateful places on earth-where reconciliation is as far as ever. If I told you apart, from the extreme Racism that was subjected to the blacks and Indians that they had better economic lives under apartheid, you probably would not believe that either, but its true. And in Asia, again like Cory Aquino, before Marcos, what happened there? Same,same, actually far worse situation today in all accounts than Marcos. Are you so Naive not to contemplate reality of politics. Do you think the perfect strategic position of the Bay of Bengal bordering China and India is not on the mind of westerns powers as perfect platform to have a military presence and to contain china? Do you think that's far fetched? If you do? I think you may have been born drinking Cachaca instead of mamas milk
Burma
[info]johnny_redgrave wrote:
Sunday, 5 July 2009 at 11:18 am (UTC)
Than Shwe and his cronies are simply criminals who have destroyed a country for their own personal gain(let's not forget also that the regime is propped up by china),they are guilty of many crimes against humanity.It is about time that they are named as such with the possibility of a trial in the Haigh,this would at least stop them from travelling the world for fear of arrest.
Something needs to be done to stop this evil regime from further murder/rape/torture/imprisonment of their own people,can the world just stand by and do nothing?,words are not enough..do something.
There was an admission from the learned Mr Yambas
[info]topolcats wrote:
Sunday, 5 July 2009 at 04:00 pm (UTC)
Given the posts thus far, in relation to the topic. An admission was made,correctly in respect to hypocrisy. For the other 2 posters, such as Ydef. No I don't jest, she is lackey in waiting, she only needs a few bribes from David Milliband and a few bars from Britannia rules the waves and she will allow military bases in Burma which will lead to Civil war. If your a Moron, your way above the intellect of Johnny Redgrave. Who fails to see the UK USA among others have destroyed by the evidence of fraud WMD's in Irag. Along with the futile death of the common English working class in war based on lies in Afghanistan. The last trial in the Hague was in essence a failure, Milosevic, whom after years could not by one iota of evidence be proven guilty. So the powers UK , USA killed him. Please don't talk to me about justice. I have seen to much injustice to be fooled by a vassal poster girl of the press such as This Burmese elite come freedom fighter Suu Kyi's. She is complete fraud.
UN Should be replaced
[info]truthneverdie wrote:
Sunday, 5 July 2009 at 08:06 pm (UTC)
UN has become outdated and its now becoming a place dominated by monsters like Russia, China, India, Pakistan, Iran, Burma and Sri Lanka. These countries are ruled by relegious fundamentalists who do not care about democracy or human rights. They do whatever they want to oppress true democracy andminorities living in those countries. IN Sri Lanka they killed over 50,000 people without any witness and put 300,000 people in a concentration camp surrounded by warbed wire,seperated families and put over 10,000 youths under torure camps. They freely killed 15 journalists and abducted over 30 journalists. Hundreds of political prisoners are in prison over 13 years without any charge. UN sec and its officers collaborated with those buddhists fundamentalists in this programme. After all this they were able to win the UN Human rights council support.Similar things are happening in Burma, Iran, Pakistan, China under closed doors. If western countries fail to take stern actions against these monsters, the whole world will have to surrender for ththese monsters.
The Peace-Prize winner can earn it by doing this!
[info]2_b_heavens wrote:
Sunday, 11 October 2009 at 06:48 pm (UTC)
Perhaps the "Peace-Prize" winner can help arrange the release of this poor woman!....
Please don't forget to pray for this poor woman. Regardless of your beliefs, no one deserves to be locked up like a caged animal. Even the terrorists have been ordered released, and they infact did something to deserve incarceration. What has she done? Nothing!!!

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date