World

Partly Sunny with Showers 11° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

British officials to meet woman facing death penalty

By Robert Verkaik, Law Editor

A pregnant woman facing the death penalty in Laos will meet British consular officials today amid growing fears she may not receive a fair trial after being imprisoned on drug smuggling charges.

Samantha Orobator, 20, from south London, was arrested nine months ago at the country's largest airport from where she was trying to return home. In January, while still in prison, she became pregnant in circumstances which have led to claims that she may have been raped.

It was initially thought the Briton, who is accused of smuggling just over 500g of heroin, might face trial as early as yesterday. In Laos, smuggling more than 500g of the drug carries a mandatory death sentence.

Representatives of the legal charity Reprieve publicised her case and over the weekend her mother Jane Orobator, a student at Trinity College Dublin, made an emotional plea for her daughter's release. Yesterday the Laotian government insisted the trial would be carried out fairly but was unable to confirm when it would happen, other than saying it was expected this week.

Today the Londoner will be visited by the vice-consul from Bangkok – the nearest British embassy to Laos – and Anna Morris, a lawyer from Reprieve. Ms Morris said she was concerned that Ms Orobator had not been assigned a defence lawyer, and that any hearing "may be quite quick in comparison to what happens in other countries".

British officials have only been able to visit Ms Orobator for 20 minutes once a month, after learning of her arrest after she had already spent many months in jail.

Foreign Office minister Bill Rammell said he will raise the case with the Laotian Deputy Prime Minister when they meet in the UK on Thursday. He said: "The British Government is opposed to the use of the death penalty in all circumstances. We have made the Laotian authorities aware of this at the highest levels in Samantha's case."

Ms Orobator was born in Nigeria but grew up in Camberwell and Peckham, from the age of eight. Phonthong prison in the Laotian capital, Vientiane, where Ms Orobator is being held, has a reputation for beatings. Cells measuring four square metres are used to house up to six prisoners and the daily ration reportedly consists of two bowls of pig-fat water and rice.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

She is not British
[info]repton4 wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 12:35 am (UTC)
She is not British she is Nigerian why aren't the Nigerian government helping her She went abroad and got caught smugling human misery what would she have done with the 1.5lbs of heroin if she had made her way back to london, now she wants the British consul to get her a get out of jail card free, I don't blame another country for taking a tough stance on drugs maybe we should look at our own soft justice system,
Re: She is not British
[info]eddy_rose wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 03:16 am (UTC)
First of all, it's a little over one pound, not a pound and a half. Second of all, regardless of nationality, she is still a human being. Thirdly, the only "misery" regarding any illegal substance is only that way as a result of being illegal, nothing else. It's not a "war on drugs" at all, it's a war against people, people like you and I who should be free to do as we please so long as we aren't hurting anyone else. If it's hurting us, then that's our business. Aerosol cans, fly-spray, petrol, alcohol, glue, electricity, literally millions of everyday products can be harmful if not used properly. In this case, a woman is to be killed, to death, forever, because something she wanted to use or had a market for, was deemed dangerous or illicit for whatever reason. People wishing to harm others for such "offences" are the most offensive people of all. I don't condone taking drugs, but I respect the individual's right to choose what is best for themself. I certainly do not condone violence of any sort. That's what viscious murderers do. I'd rather be a junky.
Re: She is not British
[info]w1p30ut wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 07:26 am (UTC)
"shes going to be killed, TO DEATH" this made me laugh. like she could be killed, but not quite to death. Reminds me of the film "murder by death". Also as an aside, the fact that potentially damaging drugs like alcohol and tobacco are legal doesn't make it wrong that illegal drugs are illegal. It just means that we should probably make alcohol etc illegal to, not make harmful drugs legal. your argument is backwards. Also people shouldnt be let loose in some sort of hedonistic society where "anything goes" that is just the dumbest idea ever. have you ever met a junkie? I have, he stole a friends bag and when i caught him and pinned him down till the police arrived his junkie girlfriend tried to glass me. had to go to the hospital for months to get checked for diseases (Hep C HIV etc). Drugs are not good, they only destroy lives, and people who pray on the those who become addicted should be at least locked up in a dark hole and have the key thrown away, if not shot as is the case here. People who deal drugs destroy lives and bring pain and suffering and crime into society, if they are willing to destroy the lives of hundreds of people by turning them into drug dependant zombies, homeless, riddled with disease, living off handouts from soup kitchens and all the while getting rich off their sick trade then they dont deserve any rights. by doing that they forfeit their rights to anything like humain treatment. Would you give the Nazis who worked in the death camps the same "human rights"? Or Joseph Fritzle? These people knowingly destory the lives of others and should be punished by having ALL their freedoms taken away.

This is perhaps a more general opinion on the drug trade, but if she was caught red handed and has a fair trial she should take her punishment. Soft punishments only let people know they can get away with it.

I dont think any of it is fair on the unborn child however, who has had no choice in any of this. This is the only sad thing about a this case (apart from if the accused is actually innocent, but corruption in the law is a debate for another day, along with it being the only real reason to not have a death penalty).

Apologies for any spelling or grammatical errors.
Re: She is not British
[info]livinginasia wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 07:50 am (UTC)
There are no circumstances that excuse drug smuggling, we all have choices!
As for only being misery because it's illegal, that's bollocks..Obviously you haven't had much contact with addicts or witnessed how destructive the drug is.
All said and done, she entered a country, knowingly broke a law for personal gain also with the knowledge that the drugs would be used for and therefore intentionally causing harm to others......!! If someone goes to the UK and commits a crime, they are subject to British law.
If anyone chooses to take this risk then they should be prepared to suffer the consequences if they get caught. Things in SE Asia are very different to the western world, we should not impose our lax morals on an area whose morals are far higher than our own.
And please, try heroin then ask your family for an opinion in 6 months!!!!!
Re: She is not British
[info]frodobaggpuss wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 11:56 am (UTC)
She to, satisfy her own greed, was prepared to ignore the well-being of 'innocent' addicts and more importantly their families. I have watched first-hand how drug dealers, living in fancy houses, destroy lives.

That said I don't want her unborn child to be harmed. So let her give birth then execute her. The grand-mother can then look after her grand-daughter in Ireland. Hopefully doing a better job the second time around.
Re: She is not British
[info]arthur_ide wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 05:48 pm (UTC)
A fetus is not an "unborn child." It is a fetus, and at what stage it is in its evolution is not clear. But Samantha Orobator should have considered that before importing drugs, and should have known the law of Laos before entering. If you want lax laws, go to Peru where you can kill your mother and get out after five years in prison, or be a part of a gang and kill an old man for a single sole (about 30 cents) and get off with a reprimand.
Re: She is not British
[info]gwilymr_j wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 02:24 pm (UTC)
You need help.
UK Should Shut Up
[info]himantha wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 03:00 am (UTC)
UK does not have any right to interfere with the Laotian judiciary system. She has done a major offense. 500g is a very large amount for heroin. she should therefore face the highest punishment possible.
Re: People should be a shamed
[info]anne2628 wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 03:19 am (UTC)
im starting to be very a shamed to be british, i live in a country were many people live a shealtered life, and they sit in their warm save houses and say such nasty disgraceful things, judging people they dont know, and showing no empathy at all. NO human being should be treat in this way, you would compain if it was an animal!! there is no excuse, I dont care what she has done, and any country which treats people in this way cannot be trusted, therefore we cannot trust that she is guilty anyway.
Re: People should be a shamed
[info]maggieathome wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 07:14 am (UTC)
An animal wouldnt try and smuggle shit like that into this country and put it on our streets, shes done wrong and she knew the LAW of the land when she entered into it. Your in that Country you have to abide by their rules!

What would have happend if she got away with it ? a lot more people being destroyed by these
" someone planted it on me smugglers"

We should change our laws in this Country and follow by example.........WERE TO SOFT !!!!

Fuck you repton4
[info]kieranmjwalsh wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 03:30 am (UTC)
the girl is very young and you dont know her circumstances and why she did it, fuck you you fucking cunt. the girl is pregnant. Its fucking herion big fucking deal, the junkies are going to find herion anyway so shut the fuck up.
Fuck you repton4
[info]kieranmjwalsh wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 03:45 am (UTC)
That girl is very young and you dont know her circumstances and why she did it, She was more then likely offered a sum of money to take the risk of carrying that into the country, fuck you you ignorant fucking cunt. The girl is pregnant. Its fucking herion big fucking deal, the junkies are going to find herion anyway so shut the fuck up and get fucking real. Eddy_rose the comment you left was wonderful and so in touch with reality. It was great to see somebody write such sense, and you can be sure that girl is not a dealer, not at 20. Shes a pawn. And its so sad to see the lengths some people have to go to get money and if you open your mind a bit you could try and think of why she would need that money. Im a 21 year old guy and I couldnt not imagine what life must be like for that girl right now, and her childs life, always knowing her mother was executed by some stupid backward retarded system in some horible country, for smuggling some herion on her person. What about the guys off the coast of ireland whos boat turned over in a storm and it was carrying something like 400m worth of cocaine. And they just get a jail sentance. And then to say oh why not get the nigerian goverment to help her, you pig, they are another retared backward country full of scum with no reguard for life. Everbody has to take another look at the whole drugs thing, if all drugs or most were made legal and taxed, it would end most gangland killings and bring in so much money to the economy, alcohol is the worst drug of all.
Re: Fuck you repton4
[info]emperor_v wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 12:31 pm (UTC)
Lovely! How articulate!! What a lovely tone!!
You must include yourself in the "scum" and "retarded" people you mention - because to refer to people and nations in that way you really have to be competely ignorant AND totally vile youreslf.
How thoroughly unpleasant and you are!!!!



Another Nigerian Lawbreaker
[info]ikoyian wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 05:57 am (UTC)
Here we go again, yet another Nigerian who economically wants to live in Britain and break its laws. This time she broke a law in a country that has strict rules about drug traffiking and is trying it on thinking its another lenient western country. Well we do not want her type or her coniving family in Britain. Its clear she inseminated herself to become pregnant and its another Nigerian scam. If she is let out please send them back to Nigeria, whether or not she was born in the tolerant UK or not.
Thanks
Re: Another Nigerian Lawbreaker
[info]buzztronic wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 06:42 am (UTC)
I've not been to Laos but believe me you stand out a mile as a white person, much more so if you're black. She had no chance at pulling it off

Her youth has led her into this. But the British Government ought not to be meddling and interfering on this.
You go into a third-world country and try to play at being the smuggler 'hero' expect to be burned. Especially when most of the time the smuggler 'hero' is being set up as 'Decoy Mule' ie one that will be grassed up and captured while the bigger shipment is let through.

Now its time for her to face up to the cruel world we live in and the one she tried to play with and lost.
Re: Another Nigerian Lawbreaker
[info]tiggerhappy87 wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 07:59 am (UTC)
Race should not be the issue here! This should be shocking no matter what nationality the person is. The things we should be questioning are: is death a good punishment for trafficking drugs, and is it right that they should get a shorter trial than those in other countries where death is not a penalty, also is it right that she hasn't been assigned adefence lawyer? If you had heard a woman had killed her husband you would conclude that she was guilty of murder, however, if you then heard that it was in self defence you would come to a different conclusion. This might be the case for this woman, however if she does not have a defence lawyer the jury may not know her side of the story, meaning justice may not be served.
Laos should be ashamed
[info]chandrika12 wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 07:19 am (UTC)
It is disgusting that such conditions exist in any country in 2009. What is wrong with the people in these countries that they run jails with conditions as described, which is an injustice on any person whatever nationality held in them, no matter what they have done, every human being deserves certain standards of life. Jails need to have standards, I dont care if they are the sickest people living in them, it is not fair or humane to keep any people in such consitions.

People who feel that criminals deserve to be abused, should take a look at themselves, as they are no better than the criminals, just had different circumtsances.
Re: Laos should be ashamed
[info]peterzxr wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 08:14 am (UTC)
Having lived in Thailand for four years; I have also visited Laos on several occasions.

It is not a secret what the "justice" and brutal prison systems are like in this part of the world. It is also no mystery as to what the punishments are for drug trafficking either. The penalty is death or life imprisonment in both countries. Also in Malaysia.

As a presumably British citizen, she is entitled to consular assistance to ensure that she is now going to be treated properly and gets proper legal representation. She is not entitled to assistance circumventing or having the law of the country she is in applied differently to her than to anyone else.

A brief look in the Lonely Planet would have told this young lady the consequences of her actions. She should have known better - she didn't or she just didn't care and will pay the price.

Get her the fair trial she deserves, have her unborn child returned to her family, and then let the Laotians carry out whatever sentence they deem fit. She can have some sympathy if she is found not guilty and released not before.

Until then she is a drug trafficker and is getting what she deserves. As the saying goes, don't do the crime if you can't do the time!
Re: Laos should be ashamed
[info]livinginasia wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 08:44 am (UTC)
This sort of attitude is EXACTLY why the UK is in such a shitstate, prisons hold no fear in the UK. Would you agree to the UK funding prisons in Laos??? As a 3rd world country they have better things to spend their limited funds on rather than pampering criminals like we do in the UK!!!!

Re: Laos should be ashamed
[info]chandrika12 wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 11:37 am (UTC)
We have les crime in UK than in countries whose penal systems are archaic and brutal. This is a fact and I feel sorry for people who live in countries that harbour such horrible attitudes as criminals "getting what they deserve" as they are raped and beaten and kept in conditions not fit for animals.

Seriously people who harbour such feelings as to being glad that criminals are treated such, should ask themselves why they feel so happy at seeing other human beings suffering, no matter what they have done, that feeling is inherently sick.
Re: Laos should be ashamed
[info]frodobaggpuss wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 11:40 am (UTC)
Laos like any other country has a set of laws which govern how people live and interact with one another. You break the law of any country you must be prepared for the consequences.

In Malaysia you still have idiots trying to smuggle drugs despite the warnings on the landing cards that drug smuggling is punishable by death.


Laos is a developing country trying to eradicate a drug problem - they should be congratulated not condemmed.
Drug Smuggling
[info]trialist01 wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 08:01 am (UTC)
What is all the fuss about? She knew the risks now she has to pay the penalty. Such crimes lead to untold violance and killings when these drugs are distibuted that it is a propper punishment. Even though it is terrible to take a human life, Criminals, and that is what she is, MUST pay the penalty.
Just Deserts
[info]peterzxr wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 08:16 am (UTC)
Having lived in Thailand for four years; I have also visited Laos on several occasions.

It is not a secret what the "justice" and brutal prison systems are like in this part of the world. It is also no mystery as to what the punishments are for drug trafficking either. The penalty is death or life imprisonment in both countries. Also in Malaysia.

As a presumably British citizen, she is entitled to consular assistance to ensure that she is now going to be treated properly and gets proper legal representation. She is not entitled to assistance circumventing or having the law of the country she is in applied differently to her than to anyone else.

A brief look in the Lonely Planet would have told this young lady the consequences of her actions. She should have known better - she didn't or she just didn't care and will pay the price.

Get her the fair trial she deserves, have her unborn child returned to her family, and then let the Laotians carry out whatever sentence they deem fit. She can have some sympathy if she is found not guilty and released not before.

Until then she is a drug trafficker and is getting what she deserves. As the saying goes, don't do the crime if you can't do the time!
Does she really care
[info]ciscogaz wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 09:47 am (UTC)
How many unborn babies and families are being damaged by the drug she is smuggling?

It is about time we were hard on these people, she is neither a fit mother or british.
Fine, just fine.
[info]the_kegs wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 12:29 pm (UTC)
Orobator-Oghagbon! oh yes, a fine old English name, originally from.....er.... the Peckham region of London if I'm not mistaken. If she is guilty, I mean really guilty and found to be so by a court of law, deliver the child then deliver the punishment. If one lives by the sword one must be prepared ....etc etc. How many people might she have helped to murder if she'd got that stuff back into this country! The punishment in this case fits the crime and if this country got it's head out of it's legally tied in a knot arse, we'd be far better for it. If this case goes the full length it'll be a long time before anyone else tries to smuggle death into this country.
Two points. Vietnam and Kuwait sound familiar.
[info]famulla wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 12:53 pm (UTC)
British officials to meet woman facing death penalty
Where is Laos. Laos (pronounced /?l??.o?s/, /?la?s/, or /?le?.?s/), officially the Lao People's Democratic Republic, is a landlocked country in Southeast Asia, bordered by Burma and China to the northwest, Vietnam to the east, Cambodia to the south and Thailand to the west. Laos traces its history to the Kingdom of Lan Xang or Land of a Million Elephants, which existed from the 14th to the 18th century.
After a period as a French protectorate, it gained independence in 1949. A long civil war ended officially when the communist Pathet Lao movement came to power in 1975, but the protesting between factions continued for several years.
Laos was dragged into the Vietnam War and the eastern parts of the country were invaded and occupied by the North Vietnamese Army (NVA), which used Laotian territory as a staging ground and supply route for its war against the South. In response, the United States initiated a bombing campaign against the North Vietnamese, supported regular and irregular anticommunist forces in Laos and supported a South Vietnamese invasion of Laos. The result of these actions were a series of coups d'état and, ultimately, the Laotian Civil War between the Royal Laotian government and the communist Pathet Lao.
Of the people of Laos 67% are Buddhist, 1.5% are Christian, and 31.5% are other or unspecified according to the 2005 census
After reading this read why Iraq was dragged into war. Kuwait?
Two points. Vietnam and Kuwait sound familiar.
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla

Drugs
[info]brazierdv wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 01:17 pm (UTC)

I'm sure the UK, like many countries, warns people about the severity of punishments for drug offences in many countries, especially in what used to be called Indo-China. And of course don't expect a judicial system comparable to what is found in the English speaking world.

The French have an expression that covers her situation, including the penalty, "Pour encourager les autres".
Justice tempered with mercy
[info]gwilymr_j wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 02:43 pm (UTC)
Some of you people are becoming rather vulgar and abusive.
Here's the solution.
Let her have the baby.
Then shoot her.
Give the baby to Madonna or Bruno.
Everybody (almost) is happy.
When a person visits a foreign nation
[info]arthur_ide wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 05:45 pm (UTC)
that person is subject to the laws of that nation and must live accordingly. Ignorance of the law is no excuse for disobeying the law. If drugs were found on anyone, and the law says the penalty for possession or smuggling drugs is death, then that person must suffer the fate of the law--regardless of gender, age, or physical condition--otherwise the law means nothing. As for the "claims" of rape--are the substantiated by fact, exploration, examination, etc? and has the rapist been accused?

Originally I was against the death penalty, but today support it for anyone who takes the life of another--regardless if the person who took another's life is male or female, old or young or at any age, infirmed or well, pregnant or not pregnant--and misuse of drugs is the same as murder and should be dealt with equally. But capital punishment must be administered swiftly--not postponed for endless months and years--nor be sentenced if there is insufficient evidence of the crime. Beatings are totally unacceptable as they are barbaric and do no good--as the USA found out when John Yoo, Condi Rice, Dick Cheney and other goons okayed the brutality of the USA military and CIA in Iraq (Abu Gharib prison) and the clandestine torture cells set up by the CIA from Poland to Peru and throughout the world where George W. Bush accepted waterboarding as necessary--making him and his cabinet guilty of crimes against humanity and all deserving the death penalty--but the USA has no court with the sufficient character or understanding the Judgment of Nuremberg, nor the determination of the Peruvian court that tried and convicted Alberto Fujimori of crimes against humanity.

The Loatian Foreign Minister knows that the UK is opposed to capital punishment in all cases. But the UK's stand does not meet the test of history where all nations and religions until recently declared "a life for a life" and its own history where UK put to death children for stealing a slice of bread or hiding a pirate. When criminals know they can get away with anything, including murder, then nothing stops them. The death penalty must be brought back. I support Samantha Orobator's execution--and it is irrelevant that she is 20 or is pregnant. She should have thought that before smuggling in the drugs. She has offended the laws, those she would share the drugs with, and sanity.
Samantha Orobator
[info]johnchase36 wrote:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009 at 08:53 pm (UTC)
This is the kind of thing that grew out of America's century-long effort to stamp out ALL use. If, instead, we'd focused on PROBLEM use, as we do for alcohol and tobacco, Samantha would never have volunteered to carry drugs because there would be no monetary incentive.
Samantha Orobator
[info]deloriz1 wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 10:00 am (UTC)
this is a very sad situation indeed. But if she's done the crime then she must do the time and in this case it is as severe as it gets. Whilst i have sympathy for the situtaion, it is all too much what represents young women from the UK feeling they are untouchable, that may be the case in the UK but not globally!

She must have been estranged from her family to get in bad company to be in this dreadful plight. This is one situation of a long line of events of the breakdown of respect and family values, the arrogance, ignorance and lack of respect of youths for elders today, feeling they are wordly and know everything when they know very little about life. My Mum always told me, if you cant hear then you will most certainly feel. It is better to be governed by the fear and values of disrespecting your family, than live a life that ends up this way.


Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date