Maoist intimidation of candidates puts Nepal poll in doubt
Tuesday 31 January 2006
Latest in Asia
On Facebook
From the blogs
We need to avoid another ‘lost generation’
A tiny green shoot one day, and then a chill wind the next. Anyone hoping for signs of economic spr...
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
Bahrain: One year on
I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...
A candidate in the municipal elections that have become a battleground for Nepal's future was critically injured by suspected Maoist rebels yesterday. Dal Bahadur Rai was in his house in the capital Kathmandu when gunmen broke in and shot him.
The elections, due to be held on 8 February, were intended to be a showpiece for King Gyanendra's claims that he intended to restore democracy to the long-suffering Himalayan nation. They are fast turning into a public relations disaster.
More than 600 candidates withdrew over the weekend, many of them fearing for their lives after the Maoists threatened "severe action" against anyone who took part - in effect a threat to kill them. But others have come forward to say they were blackmailed, or forced into standing by the authorities. And some have even said their names were registered as candidates by the authorities without their knowledge.
In one case, a housewife discovered to her astonishment that her name had been entered as a candidate in Kathmandu. Dhan Kumar Neupane's husband said authorities at first refused to let her withdraw, and it was not until he staged a protest outside the local election office that they backed down.
The number of candidates withdrawing means that more than 1,000 of the 4,146 seats in the elections will be uncontested. The Maoists have given candidates a deadline to withdraw, but there is some confusion over whether it expires today or tomorrow.
Although they are only elections for local authorities, the polls have assumed considerable significance for Nepal's future.
They are being held against a backdrop of daily street protests against King Gyanendra. Demonstrators are calling for the monarchy to be abolished and replaced with a republic.
In one provincial town, more than 150,000 people marched against the King, and his government resorted to brutal methods to contain the protests. Hundreds of political activists have been arrested and last week police opened fire on protesters with live ammunition.
Nepal's seven major political parties are refusing to take part in the elections and are calling on voters to boycott the polls, saying they are a fig leaf for King Gyanendra's autocratic rule and will not lead to a restoration of democracy.
In another blow to King Gyanendra, the European Union last week came out on the side of the parties and said the elections would be a backward step from democracy. The EU also condemned the government's repressive measures against protesters.
The elections come as the civil war with the Maoists, in which at least 12,000 people have been killed over the past 10 years, reignited after the Maoists renounced a unilateral ceasefire.
The fact that the Maoists were able to strike inside the capital, and carry out their threat to target candidates even in the most secure city in Nepal, shows how extensive is their reach.
The King sacked the entire government last year and seized back the absolute powers of a medieval king, suspending basic human rights in Nepal.
But the protests against him began after the leaders of the seven parties held face-to-face talks with the Maoist leader Prachanda, and persuaded the Maoists to sign up to a 12-point framework for peace talks.
The seven parties now say that they can deliver a peace deal with the Maoists. King Gyanendra refuses to talk with the rebels and insists that a military victory is possible.
- 1 Ninety gaffes in ninety years
- 2 Cameron's 'drunk tanks' are dangerous, say police
- 3 Can you master a language in a weekend?
- 4 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 7 You couldn't make it up: Sun staff hope Strasbourg can save them from Murdoch
- 1 Ninety gaffes in ninety years
- 2 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Rangers future could be bright says administrator
- 5 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 6 MP faces charges over Nazi stag night
- 7 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
- 8 No secularism please, we're British
- 9 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 10 Lightning kills an entire football team
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
How an abortion divided America
Did they all live happily ever after? That's up to you...




Comments