Most air strike victims were Taliban, says US
Wednesday 20 May 2009
Latest in Asia
Related articles
On Facebook
From the blogs
Disclosure: We’d never even been to a club when we made our first single
For most of us, reaching eighteen years of age opens up a new world for exploration, spontaneity and...
Top of the posts: Drunken rants, the Western Fail and misogyny pushers
The most read blogs this week, as determined by stats.
Sepp Blatter: Penalty shoot-outs must remain, they’re football’s great leveller
As England supporters, we should scorn at any such deciding factor within football. On so many occas...
Why do some men consider the street as a female meat market?
Pronouncements on sexual inequality in the UK are normally met with an eye roll by my generation. As...
The US military in Afghanistan is mounting a fierce rearguard action to justify its air strikes on villages in which it claims most of the dead were Taliban fighters, contradicting the Afghan government which says most of those killed were women and children.
The growing number of civilians dying as a result of US and Nato bombing is provoking an angry reaction among Afghans and furious protests by the Afghan government against the use of allied airpower against villages. A further eight civilians were killed by air strikes this week according to a statement by the international forces in Afghanistan.
The US military has produced its first detailed account of what happened on 4 May when US aircraft attacked three villages in the Bala Buluk district of Farah province in western Afghanistan. It admits that 20-35 civilians were killed, but claims that 60-65 of the dead were "Taliban extremists". The Afghan government account, based on interviews with surviving family members, is that 93 children, 25 adult women and 22 adult men died.
The story told by the US military spokesman Colonel Greg Julian in Kabul yesterday is specific about its conclusion that most of the dead were Taliban fighters though vague about evidence for this. Colonel Julian said that video cameras on board a B1 bomber showed two groups of people, each numbering about 30, fleeing fighting and taking refuge in houses which were then destroyed by heavy bombs.
Colonel Julian said that the 60 people moving into the houses could not be identified from the video film footage, but "other information which I could release" proved they were members of the Taliban. "These guys are running from the battle area," said Colonel Julian. "The ground commander is talking to the aircraft commander and confirming that these guys are insurgents from the battle area and regrouping." He added that the buildings were so heavily bombed that "there's not going to be much to bury."
Few Afghans are likely to accept the US military explanation of events. Earlier the new US ambassador to Afghanistan General Karl W. Eikenberry was quoted as saying that he doubted the wisdom of dropping 2,000 pound bombs on houses when it was not known who was inside and coalition forces would change their tactics in order to prevent civilian casualties.
Gen Eikenberry's admission that the US did not know who was inside the houses that were demolished contradicts the official story that they were Taliban fleeing a battle. The US military assertion that most of the dead were Taliban appears to rely on the word of the US ground commander who called the strikes in.
- 1 Mark Zuckerberg saved $111m by selling Facebook shares before stock slumped
- 2 Brazil rocked by abortion for 9-year-old rape victim
- 3 News in pictures
- 4 Tory chief Warsi failed to declare rent income from flat
- 5 In pictures: The bewildering face of China
- 6 Osborne to face questions over links to Murdoch
- 7 Is Ridley Scott the most macho man in movies?
- 8 Postgraduate students are being used as 'slave labour'
- 9 Günter Grass attacks Merkel for Athens policy
- 10 Exclusive dispatch: Assad blamed for massacre of the innocents
- 1 Brazil rocked by abortion for 9-year-old rape victim
- 2 Fat? Really? Olympic hope laughs off official’s jibe – but others aren’t amused
- 3 Leading article: Ten questions for Jeremy Hunt
- 4 Is Ridley Scott the most macho man in movies?
- 5 'Hello mum, this is going to be hard for you to read ...'
- 6 Postgraduate students are being used as 'slave labour'
- 7 African monkey meat that could be behind the next HIV
- 8 Exclusive dispatch: Assad blamed for massacre of the innocents
- 9 Coke reveals its secret: It may need to carry a cancer warning
- 10 French in uproar over oral sex anti-smoking posters
Experience the Heineken Hub
Get free wi-fi and exclusive i content while you enjoy a tasty pint of Heineken at participating pubs.
Can you imagine a career in teaching?
Be inspired to teach - let real teachers show you how rewarding the job can be.
Playing a game-changing role during the Games
Cisco is providing the solutions for London 2012's complex IT needs.
Enter the latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Business videos from commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
The secret life of the red carpet
Up and away – how '7 Up' went global



Comments