Pioneer of human cloning resigns after admitting he lied about eggs
Friday 25 November 2005
Latest in Asia
On Facebook
From the blogs
CC kills more people than cervical cancer; why haven’t we heard about it?
There is a disease whose incidence is rising in the UK and most of the industrialised world. However...
We need to avoid another ‘lost generation’
A tiny green shoot one day, and then a chill wind the next. Anyone hoping for signs of economic spr...
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
The scientist who cloned the first human embryo has resigned in disgrace from an international body after admitting he lied about the source of the eggs used in his experiments.
Professor Woo-Suk Hwang of Seoul National University in South Korea apologised for repeatedly denying that some of the eggs had come from junior members of his own research team. He said he was sorry for making misleading statements when questioned about whether the eggs had been procured unethically from young female colleagues, after the allegations had surfaced in the journal Nature.
Announcing he was stepping down as head of the World Stem Cell Hub "to atone to the public", Professor Hwang appeared downcast and solemn at a press conference yesterday.
"I am very sorry that I have to tell the public words that are too shameful and horrible," he said. "I should be here reporting the successful results of our research, but I'm sorry instead to have to apologise."
Professor Hwang had been fêted around the world when in February 2004 he announced that his team has cloned the first human embryo with a view to developing a new source of stem cells. However, rumours later emerged that some of the eggs from the 16 volunteer donors came from his colleagues which, although not illegal, is considered unethical because the women have felt under pressure to co-operate.
Professor Hwang also said that no money had changed hands with the donors but it emerged this week that a colleague had in fact paid the equivalent of about £1,000 each to some of the women.
"Being too focused on scientific development, I may not have seen all the ethical issues related to my research," Professor Hwang said. "At the time, technology was not as advanced as today and creating one stem cell line required oocytes [eggs]. It was during this time when my researchers suggested making voluntary donations. I clearly turned it down," he said.
But it has now been confirmed that at least two women from his team did donate their eggs. Professor Hwang said that he only become aware of that fact earlier this year.
Professor Hwang's admission came after an American colleague said that he would no longer work with the South Korean scientist because of allegations about unethical behaviour. Professor Gerald Schatten of Pittsburgh University School of Medicine in Pennsylvania began collaborating with him in 1984.
Scientists said that it would not be possible to obtain human eggs in Britain by the unethical methods used by the South Korean team. "In the UK we are fortunate to have had the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority in place for 15 years to supervise all research with human embryos," said Professor Ian Wilmut of the University of Edinburgh, who cloned Dolly the sheep.
Peter Braude, a stem cell scientist at King's College London, said it was "an awful shame" that Professor Hwang had been found to have lied. "However, it does not detract from the very real advance that the group has made to the science of stem cell therapy in demonstrating that tailor-made lines can be made relatively easily from eggs if they are donated by young women. The means to achieving this is questionable, not the data."
- 1 Ninety gaffes in ninety years
- 2 Cameron's 'drunk tanks' are dangerous, say police
- 3 Can you master a language in a weekend?
- 4 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 7 You couldn't make it up: Sun staff hope Strasbourg can save them from Murdoch
- 1 Ninety gaffes in ninety years
- 2 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 5 Rangers future could be bright says administrator
- 6 MP faces charges over Nazi stag night
- 7 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
- 8 No secularism please, we're British
- 9 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 10 Lightning kills an entire football team
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
How an abortion divided America
Did they all live happily ever after? That's up to you...




Comments