World

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 8° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

Sixth death in bloody week for Afghan troops

Roadside-bomb attack demonstrates strength of Taliban insurgency

By Kim Sengupta, Defence correspondent

It was the sixth death among British troops in seven days after a relative lull in casualties – lethal signs that the Taliban are launching their own surge as the US prepares for its long-awaited offensive in Afghanistan.

The latest killing, of Royal Marine Jason Mackie on Thursday, came when a convoy of armoured vehicles was hit by a roadside bomb near Musa Qala, the Helmand capital. It was a further reminder that as well as sending sizeable numbers of fighters from madrassas in Pakistan, the insurgents are acquiring increasingly sophisticated explosive devices. Five other personnel serving in southern Afghanistan have died since 7 May, four of them in one day, and another at Selly Oak Hospital, near Birmingham, after being flown back to the UK for treatment for gunshot wounds to the shoulder.

The rise in fatalities comes as General Sir Richard Dannatt, the head of the Army, said Britain needed to rebuild its reputation as the key military ally of the US in Afghanistan after criticism over its performance in Iraq.

Sir Richard said "unfairly or not", the Americans had questioned Britain's military performance during the course of the Iraq operation. He said, in a speech to the Chatham House foreign affairs think-tank: "This relationship can only be sustained if it is founded on a certain military capability threshold."

Two weeks ago, the Government confirmed there would be no permanent increase in the British force in Afghanistan after the temporary 700-troop "surge" for the presidential elections.

Senior commanders were believed to have argued for up to 2,000 extra troops but the Treasury, determined to cut the cost of military operations, was said to have blocked their request. The willingness of the Taliban to embark on a campaign at the start of the traditional fighting season while also fighting across the border in the Swat Valley is seen as a sign of their determination in what will probably be a critical summer, given the elections in August. About 22,000 new US forces are being sent to Afghanistan, many of them heading for Helmand. Britain is deploying 1,000 troops, including the temporary surge of 700 to protect the polls.

Afghan and American security estimates put the number of jihadist fighters who have arrived in southern Afghanistan from Pakistan at up to 3,000, accompanied by significant supplies of improvised explosive devices, mines, mortar and rocket rounds.

Meanwhile, reports have found that British troops are using obsolete and out-of-date kit because of delays to equipment projects. The Commons Public Accounts Committee found that delayed projects included the Terrier armoured vehicle and the Soothsayer electronic warfare system.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

So what?
[info]apilardroog wrote:
Friday, 15 May 2009 at 11:51 pm (UTC)
These mugs died for nothing. This should be made absolutely clear to all braindead loonies thinking that they could conquer the Afghans.
It might take years with many bombings of innocent villagers and indiscriminate murder but eventually "our brave boys" will be forced to leave whimpering with their tails between their legs.
Wanna bet?
Re: So what?
[info]findempire wrote:
Saturday, 16 May 2009 at 09:01 am (UTC)
They aren't "mugs" but human beings like you and me, and they most definitely did not die for nothing, although they most certainly did not die for democracy and freedom and all that crap. What they died for, and what you should ask yourself if you can do without, is the "special relationship" that makes any Brit PM say "woof woof" when Uncle Sam says "git 'um boy," thanks to which the UK does not go to the IMF with a begging bowl (as it did after Suez), gets to keep its Security Council seat, gets top billing at all international confabs, and more importantly, does not become the target of the Uncle Sam's wrath (as in oh, I don't know, shorting the Pound) that is reserved for its butlers and valets who dare to give notice.
Re: So what?
[info]apilardroog wrote:
Saturday, 16 May 2009 at 10:49 am (UTC)
No, those mugs are not human beings like you and me.
They are rotting dead meat in crates in the ground.
They won't be welcoming in the summer or lying on the beaches soaking up the sun with their families.
They won't be complaining about dodgy politicians.
They were despised while alive for murdering Afghans who had never caused them or us any harm.
They are despised now they are dead for lacking the intelligence to determine right from wrong and throwing away their lives on a worthless cause.
Good riddance.
Re: So what?
[info]soothsayer666 wrote:
Saturday, 23 May 2009 at 03:01 pm (UTC)
You small speck of human filth, Despised are they I would love to see you spouting you vile views face to face with members of the public rather than hiding behind your computer. I have more respect for the taliban who killed them at least they had the compunction to go and fight for their cause rather than a arm chair critic who hides behind his computer screen
More meat into the grinder.
[info]maxquortleplean wrote:
Friday, 15 May 2009 at 11:57 pm (UTC)
Once more our troops are sent into the field with substandard, inferior or non existent equipment and they pay the price with their lives and blood. Good vehicles exist that are proven in Afganistan and Iraq to give troops protection against the threats they face. The other contingents in Afganistan, particularly the Americans, have been using South African RG31 Armoured Vehicals because they have a proven track record. The Vikings our poor lads and lasses are using weren't even any good against petrol bombs in Northern Ireland never mind land mines. Perhaps if some of the money stolen by our politicians (none of whom have children serving on the front line in Afganistan) had been spent on decent armoured vehicles and much needed helicopter support, not so many of our brave service personel would number among the dead and injured courtesy of yet another US petrol war (to secure a oil pipeline between Uzbekistan and Pakistan that was being negociated with the taliban until 9/11. Yep thats what our lads and lasses are dying for, oil, not democracy and equal rights, just Exxons profit margin). If it doesn't make you sick, you've got a stronger stomach than me.
in an illegal corporate welfare war
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Saturday, 16 May 2009 at 04:54 am (UTC)
Shouldn't Be There
[info]silvbird wrote:
Saturday, 16 May 2009 at 06:45 am (UTC)
None of the New Labour *SCUM* can explain why Britain is there
[info]leonard_merryl wrote:
Saturday, 16 May 2009 at 08:17 am (UTC)
That fat arsehole Brown hasn't a clue. His weaselly Zionist thug Miliband is just working for the yanks on this. Straw is a gutless wazzock with no idea at all. Smith is a piss-taking Nazi.

They should all be on trial for this, along with that scumbag Blair who started it then ran like the spineless sack of shit he is.
Kim Sengupta
[info]kamakal_khan wrote:
Saturday, 16 May 2009 at 09:59 am (UTC)
Kim Sengupta has a biased view about conflict in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Being of Indian origin, he falsely links the conflict in Afghanistan to the civil war in Pakistan.
Although it is true that both conflicts are in Pashtoon areas, there is no proof that the people fighting in Afghanistan against foreign occupation are coming from Madrassas across the border. The people fighting in Swat valley are against the colonial army of Pakistan are fighting a war against injustice mainly. It is an ethnic and class conflict which is beyond Senguptas comprehension. The people will ultimately succeed in both conflicts as History has shown again and again.
More Wreath space required at the Cenotaph
[info]rhinocircus wrote:
Saturday, 16 May 2009 at 10:47 am (UTC)
Come on you British Tommies! You cannot be seen to be behind the Yanks in the killing stakes--the US needs more of you to go over the top for . . . glory of international freed- . . . corporate business.

"The rise in fatalities comes as General Sir Richard Dannatt, the head of the Army, said Britain needed to rebuild its reputation as the key military ally of the US in Afghanistan after criticism over its performance in Iraq."

Whitehall in November may see an American military contingent leading the Armistice Day parade to the Cenotaph. More wreaths for peace will be required--so do your bit and make them cost effective.

So come November 11, our dignitaries will salute the Whited Sepulchre and bow their heads.

"Lest we forget".


Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date