World

Partly Sunny with Showers 10° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

Suu Kyi to stand trial again over US visitor

Associated Press

Aung San Suu Kyi has been under house arrest for 13 of the past 19 years

AP

Aung San Suu Kyi has been under house arrest for 13 of the past 19 years

Burma's pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi was charged today with violating the terms of her house arrest after an American man swam across a lake to sneak into her home, her lawyer said.

Suu Kyi, whose latest detention period was set to end May 27, could face a prison term of up to five years if convicted, said lawyer Hla Myo Myint. The trial is scheduled to start Monday at a special court at Yangon's notorious Insein Prison, where she was arraigned Thursday.

The 63-year-old has already spent more than 13 of the last 19 years — including the past six — in detention without trial for her nonviolent promotion of democracy, despite international pressure for her release.

The American man, who has been identified as 53-year-old John William Yettaw, was arrested last week for allegedly swimming across a lake to secretly enter Suu Kyi's home and staying there for two days. His motives remain unclear.

He was charged at Thursday's hearing with illegally entering a restricted zone, which carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison, and breaking immigration laws, which is punishable by up to one year behind bars, said the lawyer.

Human rights groups said they feared the trial would be used to justify another extension of Suu Kyi's yearslong detention despite international demands for her release.

In the past the junta — which regards the Nobel Peace laureate as the biggest threat to their rule — has found reasons to extend her periods of house arrest, which international jurists say is illegal even under Burma's own law.

The regime appears bent on ensuring that general elections scheduled for next year are carried out without any significant opposition by pro-democracy groups that say the balloting will merely perpetuate military rule under a democratic guise.

Kyi Win, another lawyer for Suu Kyi, said the opposition leader did not invite the man to her home and in fact told the man to leave. He said the incident was merely a breach of the normally tight security authorities impose on Suu Kyi and her household.

"Everyone is very angry with this wretched American. He is the cause of all these problems," Suu Kyi's lawyer Kyi Win told reporters. "He's a fool."

U.S. consular chief Colin Furst was allowed to visit Yettaw, of Falcon, Missouri, for the first time on Wednesday.

"He seemed to be in good spirits and in good health," U.S. Embassy spokesman Richard Mei reported Thursday. Mei was not present at the arraignment and said he did not immediately have additional details.

"I know that John is harmless and not politically motivated in any way. He did not want to cause Suu Kyi any trouble," his stepson Paul Nedrow wrote in an e-mail to The Associated Press. He said he was concerned over his stepfather's health since he was a diabetic and the ailment "could cause him to become disoriented and confused and be unable to make wise choices for himself."

State television Thursday said Yettaw had served two years in the military and listed his occupations as "student, clinical psychology, Forest Institution."

Earlier Thursday, armed police drove Suu Kyi and two women who live with her to Insein Prison. The two women, who have lived with Suu Kyi since she was last detained in 2003, were also charged with the same offense, lawyers said.

"This is a non-bailable case, but we will fight for bail," Hla Myo Myint told reporters outside the prison after Suu Kyi and Yettaw were charged.

Australian Foreign Minister Stephen Smith described Suu Kyi's arrest as "gravely concerning" and called for her immediate release.

National Coalition Government of the Union of Burma, which describes itself as the country's government-in-exile, said the junta was using the incident to extend Suu Kyi's detention.

"It is nothing more than a political ploy to hoodwink the international community so that it can keep (Suu Kyi) under lock and key while the military maneuvers its way to election victory on 2010," the group's Prime Minister Sein Win was quoted as saying in a statement.

Suu Kyi has recently been ill, suffering from dehydration and low blood pressure. Her condition improved this week after a visit from a doctor who administered an intravenous drip, said Nyan Win, the spokesman of her National League for Democracy Party, who is part of a team of three lawyers hoping to represent her.

"Please tell them (reporters) I am well," Kyi Win quoted Suu Kyi as saying. But he added: "I am very concerned about Suu Kyi's health, even though she said she is well."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Ad madness
[info]folle_contessa wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 09:24 am (UTC)
It's impossible to read this story with that ad for rooms whizzing past in the corner of my eye. Instant headache. I'm off to read this on another site.
Re: Ad madness
[info]macca1er wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 03:56 pm (UTC)
ageed. how dare she have an opinion, or question the government, or think of things, she is clearly a phsycotic terrorist. shoot her ...
She is too pro Western and a traitor to her country.
[info]djangovsartana wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 09:50 am (UTC)
She is too creepy crawly to the West that that could actualy harm her country.
She deserves to be under house arrest indefenitly. She is subversive and a trouble maker.
Re: She is too pro Western and a traitor to her country.
[info]jonny_socialist wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 01:53 pm (UTC)
How dare you denigrate one of the bravest and most dignified political activists in the world.
Re: She is too pro Western and a traitor to her country.
[info]brazil2009 wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 04:23 pm (UTC)
You are entitled to have your own view on this issue. I find your comment outrageous though. She is a brave person. I have not a clue to where you're coming from. If you had written the title of your comment as "She is too pro Western and a traitor to the regime", well, fair enough. Not too bad. But How can you compare a regime like that ( a f...ng regime) with the whole people of Burma? I am brazilian and lived under a dictatorship, so I am not talking rubish here. I do know how petty regime like that can be.You may say, Brazil, that 3rd world Country. It is true to some parts of the Country but still it is the 10th largest economy in the World. Are we too Pro Western? Pro Western? What a nonsensical proposition you had there. No, you are right, you have your own opinion and I respect you for that. But I pray that not too many people share your point of view. I find this world we live in sometimes too barbaric to bear and find it difficult to come to terms with the fact that some people come up with such a degrading view on current affairs. I would love to blame that on misinformation but at this day and age, that's no longer possible, I am afraid.

Re:She is too pro Western and a traitor to her country.
[info]gordon123 wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 10:06 am (UTC)
On the contrary, she is a woman of principle who is standing up for what she believes to be right, something the Burmese junta has not concept of, all they are interested in is staying in power and keeping the people in poverty and ignorance. It is a despicable regime, that will no doubt ensure that the " Election" is suitably fixed to ensure that it retains control. I doubt that people like you have would have the courage to oppose something that is clearly wrong.
Relentless US effort
[info]floppsiefrog wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 11:02 am (UTC)
The Americans will do anything to gain influence and access to resources around the globe; either supporting tyrants to fight terrorism, or sponsoring terrorists to fight tyrants. It makes no difference. The guy caught swimming to this patsy's home was probably conveying news about the availability of zillions to finance a colourful pro-democracy revolution to liberate Burma's huddled masses. The Burmese Generals told the Americans to get lost when they offered 'humanitarian' assistance not too long ago, but the thick-skinned idiots didn't get the picture. Is anyone surprised?
NATO & Ms. Hillary Clinton, where are you? UN is hopeless!
[info]nooraza wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 06:21 pm (UTC)
Why is the international community and law are so helpless against such long enough atrocity? Please send NATO to save the Burmese people and this very brave lady, Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi, for goodness sake! Is this still dark age world where barbarian regimes can do whatever they want?
Link | Reply | Thread

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date