World

Partly Sunny with Showers 11° London Hi 11°C / Lo 6°C

UK troops carry out major Afghan operation

By Emma Rowley, Press Association

British troops in Afghanistan have carried out one of the biggest air operations of modern times, the Ministry of Defence said.

Operation Panther's Claw, an assault by Scots soldiers on one of the last Taliban strongholds in Helmand Province, began just before midnight on Friday.

Twelve Chinook helicopters, supported by 13 other aircraft including Apache and Black Hawk helicopter gunships and Harrier jets, dropped more than 350 troops from the Black Watch into Babaji, north of Lashkar Gah.

The aim was to secure a number of canal and river crossings to establish a permanent International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) presence in what was previously a Taliban stronghold.

The troops were followed by Royal Engineers and explosive teams who spent the last two days building checkpoints - soon to be permanently occupied by the Afghan National Police - on the main routes in and out of the area to hinder movement by insurgents.

The insurgents launched a number of attacks against the Black Watch but each was fought off and the Scottish troops have secured three main crossing points: the Lui Mandey Wadi crossing, the Nahr-e-Burgha canal and the Shamalan canal.

They also found 1.3 tonnes of poppy seed and a number of improvised explosive devices and mines before they could be laid.

Lieutenant Colonel Nick Richardson, spokesman for Task Force Helmand, said the find demonstrated the link between the insurgency and opium production "which brings so much misery to the streets of the UK".

He said: "This operation has been achieved in many ways due to the arrival of extra US troops into the south of Helmand, which has provided ISAF with a massive increase in capability which we believe will significantly change the balance in the province."

The operation is the latest in a series over the last few months where UK and ISAF forces have taken and held ground in Helmand.

Chief of Defence Staff Sir Jock Stirrup told ITV News: "All operations in Afghanistan are significant but we're in a particularly challenging period at the moment with the run-up to the presidential election.

"The provision of sufficient levels of security so that we can have a successful election is extremely important. Of course, this operation is all part of the wider ISAF plan to deliver that."

He said the operation was "fairly large" but also significant because Helmand was the focus for most violence and insurgent activity in Afghanistan.

"That's understandable because this is vital ground for the enemy," he said.

"In that context, this is the point of confrontation between ISAF and the Taliban. So, you can imagine that it's a pretty crucial operation."

Asked whether there could be more troops in Helmand were it not for political refusal, Sir Jock said: "We are constrained in what we can actually sustain out here in theatre on an enduring basis, and this is an enduring campaign - we have to be here for the long haul so there is a limit to what we can do.

"The numbers that we are talking about are not going to make a fundamental difference to the conduct of this campaign but they will enable us to do more things, and to do more things more quickly."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Why so long and drawn out?
[info]bemusedd wrote:
Tuesday, 23 June 2009 at 09:44 am (UTC)
Something is rather confusing. With all the military might that the Americans and the British have at their disposal e.g. air power, land forces and satellites, why are they finding it so difficult to weed out people living in caves in a relatively localised area? Why are the satellites not spotting supply routes? Why are the supply routes not being blocked? Even if they live in caves so protected from air attacks, why aren't the Americans and British just flooding the area with troops - between them they probably have enough personnell worldwide to cover every square meter of the area - why not flood the place and get it over and done with? Is there political and economic mileage in dragging it out? These are just quick thoughts after reading the article so I hope somebody can enlighten the rest of us.
Re: Why so long and drawn out?
[info]breakinitdown83 wrote:
Tuesday, 23 June 2009 at 09:13 pm (UTC)
This is a common problem when dealing with large scales. It's very hard for people to really grasp what they physically mean. So here's a very simplified breakdown of the situation:

UK Troops: 8300
US Troops: 29820
Total Troops: 38120 (this total includes non-combat personnel such as engineers)

Area of Helmand Province: 58584 sq. km (assuming flat terrain)

That comes out to 0.65 soldiers/sq. km or 0.00000065 soldiers/sq. m. This is of course assuming that all the US and UK troops were located in the Helmand province, which they are not. As you can see, if you literally wanted to flood "every suqare meter of the area" with soldiers, you'd have to supply 1.5 million times as many troops for just the Helmand province. Afghanistan in its entirety has an area of 647,500 sq. km which is about 11 times the size of Helmand.

As for satellites, this is another situation where people have trouble grasping the immensity of the task. While observational satellites can certainly see huge swathes of land, they can only make out details (i.e. supply convoys) if they zoom in, just like your camera. Once you zoom in though, you lose your wide field of vision. Just like trying to find an object in your room by scanning through your zoomed lens, trying to find a convoy is actually rather difficult if you don't have any intelligence about likely locations or routes.

Add in the fact that you're trying to find a group of people who hide in remote and rugged terrain, and the problem grows exponentially. Hope that helps clarify things a bit.
outrageous!
[info]wetgash wrote:
Tuesday, 23 June 2009 at 11:47 am (UTC)
what the fck are they doing there?

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date