World

4° London Hi 9°C / Lo 3°C

Suspected US missile kills 12 militants in Pakistan

By Andrew Buncombe in Lahore

Missiles believed to have been fired from a US drone struck a remote compound linked to Taliban leader Baitullah Mehsud today - the day after he threatened to attack Washington and took responsibility for the assault on a police training camp in Pakistan.

Neither Mr Mehsud or one of his senior lieutenants said to use the compound were present, but up to 12 people were killed and several others wounded.

Reports said that up to 30 people, described as suspected militants, were at the compound in Pakistan's Orakzai tribal region close to the Afghan border when the two missiles tore into the property. Soon afterwards, the bodies of the dead and wounded were moved from the location. Liaquat Ali, a local government official, confirmed the attack but was unable to provide further details.

The strike came a day after Mr Mehsud claimed responsibility for the assault on a police cadet training centre on the outskirts of Lahore that left at least eight people dead and more than 100 injured. Three militants were killed while at least one suspected member of the group was captured alive.

In an unusual move, Mr Mehsud, thought to be in his mid-30s, apparently took the decision to personally telephone media organisations and take responsibility, saying the attack had been carried out in response to ongoing US missile strikes. At the same time, he also vowed to respond to a $5m bounty recently placed on his head by the US by launching an attack on Washington. “You can't imagine how we could avenge this threat inside Washington, inside the White House,” he told Reuters.

The FBI said Mr Mehsud had previously made similar threats and that there was no intelligence to suggest an attack was imminent. However, coming so swiftly after the US announced the reward and also unveiled a new strategy for Pakistan and Afghanistan, the direct threat has underlined how the stakes have been raised between Washington and this leader of the Pakistan Taliban.

“Whether he has the capacity to do this really is the million dollar question,” said Ayesha Siddiqa, an Islamabad-based security analyst. “He is all about spreading terror and given what is happening in south Asia he knows that whatever he says will be taken much more seriously. My instinct is that he would not have the capacity to do something in the heart of Washington but that is not the issue. The fact that people there are getting worried by his statements means his job is done.”

Three years ago Mr Mehsud, who comes from a family of truck drivers in South Waziristan and whose face is believed to have never been captured on film, was named the “emir” of the Movement of Taliban Pakistan, an umbrella group of militant organisations believed to be responsible for a wave of attacks, including the assassination of former prime minister Benazir Bhutto.

His organisation has never been held responsible for attacks outside of Pakistan and as such, he was less of a priority for the US, whose efforts concentrated on targets believed to be carrying cross-border attacks against Western troops inside Afghanistan. However, since the Obama administration took office, the US has begun to dispatch missiles at targets associated with Mr Mehsud and his allies.

The switch in tactics appears to have coincided with a decision by Mr Mehsud to join forces with two former rival Taliban leaders, Maulvi Nazir and Hafiz Gul Bahadur. Putting aside their differences, the three militant leaders came together to create the so-called Union of the Consultative Council of Mujahideen. The move followed a call by Afghan Taliban leader Mullah Omar, urging militants in Pakistan to work together to “liberate Afghanistan from the occupation forces”.

If Mr Mehsud's group was responsible for Monday's assault it suggests an increasing nexus between militants in Pakistan's tribal areas and those in the heartland province of Punjab. Several cadets who survived the assault reported hearing the attackers speaking with southern Punjabi accents.

A report in Pakistan's The News said the attack had been planned by another close ally and tribal associate of Mr Mehsud, Hussain Mehsud, who has been named as the leader's successor should he be killed. The paper named one of the suspected militants captured, said by officials to be an Afghan national, Hijratullah, also known as Nadeem Asghar.

Whether some cross-fertilisation between militant groups and the forming of a new alliance would give Mr Mehsud the ability to launch an attack on the US capital is far from clear, even though some reports suggest he already has links with al-Qa'ida fighters.

Bahukutumbi Raman, a former national security advisor to the Indian government, said that by itself the Pakistan Taliban was unlikely to have the resources to strike outside of Afghanistan and Pakistan. However he said Mr Mehsud was believed to have developed links with other militant groups that may even have a presence within the US. He said: “You have to take seriously the threat of an attack through one of these other groups.”

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Terrorism
[info]velu_balendran wrote:
Wednesday, 1 April 2009 at 09:12 am (UTC)
Who gives the US the right to bomb anywhere in the world?
American terrorism
[info]studentclass wrote:
Wednesday, 1 April 2009 at 01:22 pm (UTC)
there is virtually no coverage of this on the main stream media, ths usa have killed 350 pakistanis with their cowardly drone attacks.
[info]chanch5 wrote:
Wednesday, 1 April 2009 at 02:21 pm (UTC)
"Pakistan, a key US ally, opposes such drone attacks because it believes they are a violation of the country's sovereignty and kill innocent civilians. "


I love the "it believes" part. Like they're not really sure.

Picture the same story, God forbid, about a drone killing 12 people in London, and see if the British media relegate it to such low priority news.

That's 12 Jill Dandos, 12 Victoria Climbies, whether or not "suspected" of something (of knowing a person who had made apparently empty threats in this case "The FBI, however, said he had made similar threats previously and there was no indication of anything imminent. ").
Enough
[info]kodak321 wrote:
Wednesday, 1 April 2009 at 08:00 pm (UTC)
Yeah, but we're civilised, with a forgiving religion. muslims are backward and should be taken out of the equation. Destroy them...and let's get on with our lives....simple....
US missile kills
[info]blastarrbxiii wrote:
Wednesday, 1 April 2009 at 10:28 pm (UTC)
US missile kills 12 militants.
US missile kills 12 Taliban militants.
US missile kills 12 Radical Cleric Taliban militants.
US missile kills 12 Insurgent Radical Cleric Taliban militants.
US missile kills 12 Terrorist Insurgent Radical Cleric Taliban militants.
US missile kills 12 Al-Qaeda linked Terrorist Insurgent Radical Cleric Taliban militants.
.
US missile kills 12 Pakistani's in Pakistan.
amerikkka versus wedding parties
[info]britfree wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 12:33 am (UTC)
they spread murder and corruption over the whole world , refuse point blank to operate within any perameters that thay have not set for themselves ,hypocritically claiming juristiction , mind you, over every citizen , of any country , if the citizen belongs to one of their sattleite states , that state will surrender them meekly , if not , they can be stolen off the street . they might then be tortured , by proxy . no democracy that stands against them but they will subvert and overthrow it . all these things are the truth . nobody that has studied the post war dispensation could deny that they are truth . russia and china will destroy their hegemony , starting with their worthless currency , ( high wages /low production ) cant wait to see them brought low . and they can take the filthy british state with them
no threads dealing with zionisms crimes
[info]britfree wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 12:44 am (UTC)
independent ? yeah right !?!? ,all , every , story dealing with zionism lack the facility to comment . you can comment on jade goody but not benjamin nathan judahs racist cabinet , you can comment on jaqui smith and her hubbies porn films , but not collaboration by orchestra directors and its ramifacations . some independence that shows . they ride us like ants mounted on elephants . the goading mahoots of world opinion,

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date