World

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 6° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

14 killed as gas train explodes in town inferno

Associated Press

Rescuers stand near a wrecked carriage a few hours after two gas-filled rail tankers exploded in the seaside resort of Viareggio

AFP/Getty Images

Rescuers stand near a wrecked carriage a few hours after two gas-filled rail tankers exploded in the seaside resort of Viareggio

At least 14 people were killed and 50 injured overnight in Italy when a freight train hauling liquefied petroleum gas derailed and exploded as it passed their homes, officials said today.

About 1,000 people were evacuated following the blast just before midnight on Monday in the Tuscan seaside town of Viareggio, about 350 km (220 miles) north of Rome.

Thirty-seven people were serious injured, with 16 of them in critical condition, including a two-year-old who was badly burned and was being transferred to a hospital in Florence, rescue workers said.

It was Italy's most deadly rail accident since 17 people were killed in January 2005, when a passenger train collided with a freight train near the northern city of Bologna.

"The emergency and danger are not over. The area has been sealed off and search and rescue operations are ongoing," said Guido Bertolaso, head of Italy's civil protection agency.

"We have a convoy with four train wagons that are still carrying liquefied petroleum and are off the tracks, on their sides .... so the area is still at a really high risk level because the fire is still smouldering."

Firefighters battled overnight to contain blazes started by the explosion, which spread to nearby buildings and even set cars alight. The area around the tracks was blackened and some homes collapsed.

Rescue workers were trying to determine the whereabouts of some 30 people, registered living in buildings damaged or destroyed by the accident. But of these, only three or four people were feared buried, they said.

The civil protection agency pegged the number of dead at 14, compared to an estimate of 15 dead by rescue workers. the explosion and, as a precaution, were siphoning off liquefied petroleum gas from other, unexploded tanks in the wrecked train.

GATX Rail Europe, a unit of the US-based GATX Corp, which owns the rail cars - each one made of a gas tank attached to a wagon - told Reuters it did not know the cause of the explosion and was gathering information from news reports.

Chief Financial Officer Werner Mitteregger said the tanks being transported on the Italian railways were new.

Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi called the episode "serious and upsetting" and was expected to visit the area on Tuesday.

At least two children were among the dead, officials said.

"Let me see him! Let me see him!" screamed one man trying to see his grandson, who was among the dead, ANSA news agency reported.

State railways said the accident occurred when one carriage derailed, pulling another four with it. Liquefied petroleum gas escaped from a tank on one of the carriages and caught fire.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

LNG by train?!!
[info]freedommonger wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 06:30 am (UTC)
Why on earth was LNG being transported by train from le spezia?

The vast majority (I thought all) LNG is regassified at receiving terminals on the coast where it can be safely handled away from population. La Spezia has such facilities. If I were Italian I would want to know why such a ridiculously dangerous and unnecessary thing as LNG by train was bewing done in a first world country. Is there insufficient capacity at La Spezia? Or insufficient pipeline capacity to supply Pisa?

Either way, this would never happen in the UK where our massive expansion into LNG is to be received and regassified at Milford Haven and Canvey Island, both a long way from population and involving no on-land transport of LNG as it will all be regassified at the receiving terminals.
Re: LNG by train?!!
[info]citizengc wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 02:29 pm (UTC)
LPG not LNG!!
Re: LNG by train?!!
[info]freedommonger wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 03:48 pm (UTC)
my mistake, thanks for the correction
Re: LNG by train?!!
[info]prolofo wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 02:32 pm (UTC)
It was LPG, not LNG. Although classified as 'Dangerous Goods' its commonly carried by rail and road. One can only assume the derailment caused a tank to rupture or a fire caused by the accident overloaded the tanks relief valve and had the same effect.
Re: LNG by train?!!
[info]seaviewer wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 07:48 pm (UTC)
In reply to 'freedomonger' would you let know on what facts you base your information. The Milford Haven Waterway has oil refineries 2 large LNG terminals and jetties, constant shipping including large quantities of LNG and LPG and approximately a population of 20,000 living very close to all these dangers. By comparison, the amounts of gas being handled on this waterway make the amount which caused the disaster seem miniscule. To add to our concerns we do not even have a published emergency and evacuation plan if such a disaster should occur in this area.

Most popular in Europe

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date