Boom-bang-a-bust Glitz of Eurovision proves too costly for some in age of austerity
Portugal and Poland drop out because winning would be disaster
The Eurovision Song Contest has always divided opinion. For some, it is a hideous parade of cringeworthy kitsch, for others it is a matter of the utmost national pride.
But increasingly, the annual festival of camp is becoming an expense too far for cash-strapped European countries trying to implement austerity measures.
With that in mind, two nations have pulled out of next year's competition, to be held in Malmo, Sweden, citing financial concerns. Sweden won last year's tournament after singer Loreen beat the Buranovskiye Babushki, a group of singing grannies from an isolated Russian village, into top spot.
According to Eurovision custom, the winners are obliged to host the next tournament, and there were rumours last year that the Spanish entrants had been told to try not to win.
Now it seems that, rather than strive for nul points, countries are finding it easier to pull out of the event altogether, with both Poland and Portugal announcing their withdrawal in the past few days.
The Portuguese national broadcaster cited financial pressure as the main reason. The country was given a £63bn bailout by the EU last year, and saw violent clashes earlier this month as protesters fought with riot police over new austerity measures.
Amid the spending cuts, hosting a Eurovision Song Contest is the last thing that Lisbon needs. Given that the country has never finished above sixth place in the whole history of the competition, the government probably had little to worry about, but is clearly not going to take any chances.
Poland skipped last year's contest and has made the same decision again, citing financial pressures after its co-hosting of the European football championships this summer.
While for eurozone countries feeling the economic squeeze, hosting a Eurovision Song Contest is the last thing their governments want to splash out on, in recent years former Soviet countries have shown how seriously they take the contest.
When the Russian singer Dima Bilan won Eurovision in 2008, he was personally congratulated by Vladimir Putin, who promised a special show the next year. The Moscow Eurovision, which at the time was thought to have been the most expensive in history, was estimated to have cost around £25m to host, while the following year in Oslo came in at around £23m.
Last year's tournament in Baku dwarfed these figures, however.
Oil-rich Azer-baijan built the Crystal Hall, a concert arena seating 23,000, specially for Eurovision, and the event became something of a national rallying point. The President's wife was the head of the organising committee, and a huge PR campaign was launched to promote the country through Eurovision.
Critics said that the dictatorial government of President Ilham Aliyev used the glitz of Eurovision to mask serious human rights issues. Unofficial estimates said the Baku government may have spent up to £500m.
In the current climate, these are expenses to which Portugal and Poland have decided they can ill afford to risk exposing themselves.
- 1 Snoop Dogg and Jared Leto buy a stake in Reddit as A-list invests $50m
- 2 Prince held a Facebook Q&A and this is the only question he answered
- 3 Car tax disc changes: Two days to go - and they affect you much more than just not displaying a piece of paper
- 4 Now we know whose fault it is if you end up being murdered in Thailand
- 5 35,000 walrus gather ashore on north-west Alaska beach 'for a rest'
Snoop Dogg and Jared Leto buy a stake in Reddit as A-list invests $50m
Five-year-old Iris Grace is raising awareness of autism through her extraordinary paintings
Car tax disc changes: Five facts you never knew about your (almost obsolete) tax disc
The Aral Sea: Nasa pictures show how what was once the fourth largest lake in the world has become almost completely dry
Brad Pitt, on the moment he completely lost his temper with Clint Eastwood's son
Exclusive: 'Putin's Russia has been my biggest regret,' says Nato's outgoing Secretary General
The Osborne Ultimatum: Chancellor’s benefits freeze bombshell will affect ten million households
There’s no excuse for Dave Lee Travis’s behaviour, but we need to keep a sense of proportion
Should gay sex be illegal? 16% of Britons think so
Mark Reckless becomes second Tory MP to defect to Ukip in a month
Benefits 'smart cards' plan revealed by Iain Duncan Smith to stop claimants spending welfare money on alcohol
- < Previous
- Next >
£18000 - £23000 per annum + Uncapped OTE: SThree: SThree Group have been well ...
£18000 - £23000 per annum + OTE: SThree: Real Staffing Group is seeking Traine...
£120 - £140 per day: Randstad Education Leeds: We have an exciting opportunity...
Competitive: Randstad Education Manchester: SEN Teacher urgently required for ...