Bridge could cost Dresden its UN world heritage status
Tuesday 29 August 2006
Latest in Europe
Related articles
On Facebook
From the blogs
More than half of Afghanistan’s families live in extreme poverty
Leila is watching her baby intently, as his mouth moves trying to swallow the small blob of yellow p...
Time for a new approach to alcohol
Ambulances were called and three drunk teenagers were brought to my care. One was so drunk we had to...
Bahrain: One year on
I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...
Paul Volcker stands tall against the banking lobby
Why is Europe, which likes to present itself as an opponent of speculative "Anglo-Saxon" finance, li...
The works of 18th-century Baroque artists won Dresden its reputation as "Florence on the Elbe" and a multi-billion dollar post-war reconstruction effort has since restored its bomb-shattered remains almost to its former glory.
Yet the capital of the east German state of Saxonyfaces the prospect of losing its hard-won and recently gained status as a Unesco world heritage site because of an apparently unwinnable dispute over a road traffic bridge project.
Despite opposition, Dresden's city government this week announced its intention to press ahead with plans for the construction of an 800m-long, four-lane bridge that will cross the Elbe just upstream from the city, in an attempt to reduce growing traffic congestion.
Last year the formal reconsecration of the city's symbolic church became the focus of global media attention. More than €130m (£88m) was spent on an 11-year scheme to reconstruct the building destroyed by Allied bombing in 1945. Unesco and environmentalists insist that the bridge will destroy the historic and panoramic view of the city.
Birgitta Ringbeck, a delegate from Unesco's German committee, has said that the bridge project is a "national disgrace", and has informed the Saxon state government that Dresden will lose its world heritage site status, granted in 2004, if the project goes ahead.
"This will be a first - so far no German city has ever been struck off the list," she said last week.
Dresden's city councillors point to a city-wide plebiscite in February last year which resulted in a two-thirds majority voting in favour of the bridge.
Jan Mücke, a liberal councillor and fervent bridge supporter, said: "Of course there will be discussions about this at an international level and this will not be nice for Germany. The bridge is wholly legitimate from a democratic point of view."
The project's backers claim that Unesco has failed to suggest any alternatives to cope with the city's traffic problems, and argue that democratic principles are being trampled on by the UN organisation.
The city council stresses that under German law the outcome of a plebiscite can only be overturned by a second plebiscite, which needs the approval of two-thirds of its members. They say another round of voting is unlikely because more than two-thirds of the city's council members support the project.
Unesco counters that Dresden applied for world heritage site status of its own free will, and that as a holder of the title the city inevitably renounces some of its sovereignty.
Germany's Green Party this week demanded that an attempt be made for national reconciliation. Germany's foreign and culture ministries, Unesco's normal discussion partners, have kept out of the dispute. The German media have largely opposed the project.
Next week Dresden reopens its 17th-century collection of artefacts procured by the former king of Saxony, August the Strong.
- 1 No secularism please, we're British
- 2 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 3 'Drunk tanks' and minimum prices to help Britain sober up
- 4 Working as a jail torturer ruined my life
- 5 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 6 Reinstate Knox's murder charge, Italian court told
- 7 Caught in his own blast: an Iranian targeting Israel
- 1 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 2 How Koscielny became prince of the Emirates
- 3 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 4 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 5 No secularism please, we're British
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 Matthew Norman: There's always the Human Rights Act, Trevor
- 8 Special report: The hungry generation
- 9 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 10 Six Grammys, five years off: Adele puts love before career
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
How an abortion divided America
Did they all live happily ever after? That's up to you...




Comments