Communist leader finds his jokes about President Putin are no laughing matter
Saturday 03 November 2007
Latest in Europe
On Facebook
From the blogs
Roy Hodgson for England: A club of one
To argue against Harry Redknapp for England is akin to arguing in favour of bankers bonuses. While s...
Time for a reality check on the Sri Lankan civil war
Sri Lanka, much like Britain, has side-lined accountability long enough.
Children Of Alcoholics week: One million children may just be the tip of the iceberg
Children Of Alcoholics week starts today. So, what are the aims for Nacoa during this important week...
Review of Being Human: ‘Being Human 1955’
Following on from an episode tinged with tragedy, this week lifted the mood with something lighter.
The Siberian city of Novosibirsk has discovered the dangers of free speech after a Communist Party newsletter containing jokes about President Vladimir Putin prompted an investigation by the FSB security service.
A series of jokes attributed to the party leader Gennady Zyuganov gently poked fun at Mr Putin and the United Russia party he will lead into elections in a month's time. In a sign that criticism of the Kremlin-backed party will not go down well, a local FSB official in Novosibirsk reported the circular to his superiors, saying the Communists made "inappropriate references to United Russia and President Putin".
The election campaign in Russia begins officially today and United Russia is expected to dominate coverage and sweep the vote. International observers have criticised Russia's plans to restrict monitoring of the poll.
A return to the 1930s, when telling "Trotskyite jokes" could be fatal, is unlikely but it does pay to be prudent when poking fun at Mr Putin. Earlier this year, a regional newspaper got into hot water after portraying Mr Putin as a Sovietdouble agent in Nazi uniform on its front page, while a reporter was taken to court last year for describing Mr Putin as a "phallic symbol" in an online report.
Now that Mr Putin is head of United Russia, the implications for the parliamentary elections are huge. "You can't criticise Putin on television or in the mainstream media, so now you can't criticise United Russia either," said Dmitry Oreshkin, a political analyst.
United Russia wants to portray the election not as a fight between political parties but as a referendum on Putin, said the analyst. The party's slogan is "Putin's Plan is Russia's Victory".
Eleven parties have been registered for the vote but the Communists are the only party apart from United Russia who are certain to garner the 7 per cent required to enter the Duma. "United Russia will get 60 or 65 per cent of the vote," said Mr Oreshkin. "All the regional governors will be doing their best to push up the figures."
Other possible contenders to make the next Duma are Fair Russia, which was set up with Kremlin support to run as a controllable opposition but has lost its way since Mr Putin threw all his backing behind United Russia, and the Liberal Democrats, run by the controversial nationalist Vladimir Zhirinovsky and featuring on its ticket Andrei Lugovoy, who is wanted in Britain for questioning over the murder of Alexander Litvinenko.
It's far from certain that either of Russia's genuine liberal parties will make it, since they have failed to join forces and offer a common liberal candidate. "Their disunity is a problem, and liberals now find themselves demoralised and are retreating, becoming more like Soviet-era kitchen dissidents," said Mr Oreshkin.
Even further to the fringe is The Other Russia, an opposition coalition led by the former world chess champion Garry Kasparov and the writer Eduard Limonov, which has been refused registration but is calling on its supporters to write the party's name on ballot papers when they vote. The party reported this week that its activists had been detained by plainclothes policemen and its campaign materials had been seized in different Russian cities.
International concerns about the vote have been intensified by the circumstances surrounding the invitation of European monitors, which have been described as "unnecessarily late". The invitation also limited the number of observers to 70, and contained a number of implicit and explicit restrictions. About 400 observers were sent to monitor the 2003 parliamentary elections.
- 1 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 2 Fear for deported Saudi 'ridiculous', says Malaysian home minister
- 3 Eight arrests as Murdoch 'throws staff to the wolves'
- 4 Israel blames Iran for embassy bomb attacks
- 5 Now The Sun tries to call in its favours from Downing Street
- 6 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 7 BBC to issue global apology for documentaries that broke rules
- 1 Kate Allen: It's time for America to put an end to this shameful scandal
- 2 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 3 Chemotherapy is 'safe during pregnancy'
- 4 BBC to issue global apology for documentaries that broke rules
- 5 Rhodri Marsden: What we like and what we don't like are often closer than you'd think
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 8 Henry does it his way, ending on a high note
- 9 Modern lovers: The 'sexual body warriors' and pioneers transforming 21st-century relationships
- 10 Redknapp hints at same old faces for England
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Day In a Page
Apple admits it has a human rights problem
James Lawton: AVB looks all at sea
Procrastination: Not now – I'm busy
Silent revolution at the Baftas
The diva who had – and lost – it all


Comments