Showdown in Berlusconi case may become farce
Monday 06 March 2006
Latest in Europe
On Facebook
From the blogs
Why David Cameron owes unemployed single mothers an apology
How would you describe an unemployed single mother, with moderate depression, who can't afford new s...
Can we shop our way out of a recession?
The idea that a lot of shopping translates into a healthy economy is dubious. On the three prior oc...
How social networking made public vanity acceptable
When did it become acceptable to brag about oneself publicly?
‘French beer is unknown. We must change that’
Stereotypes die hard. ‘The Very Hungry Frenchman’, the BBC’s current television series following che...
After an investigation lasting years and the scrutiny of 15,000 pages of documents, the showdown in the case of David Mills and Silvio Berlusconi is approaching.
However, those expecting a brisk trot through the courts followed by a speedy verdict and sentence will be disappointed. That is not the way things are done in Italy.
Tuesday is the deadline for evidence to reach the office of the prosecutors in Milan. It is also the deadline for the defence to lodge any objections to the proposed prosecution. They may also demand that defendants be re-interviewed, which would push the deadline back further.
But, supposing that does not happen, the judge will some time this week, probably on Wednesday, begin considering whether the prosecutors have a strong enough case to put Mr Mills and Mr Berlusconi on trial. He must make his decision within 30 days. But then the farcical part begins.
The new trial must find its place in a legal calendar that is already packed with appointments. It is like trying to find a parking place in central Milan. At the best there are likely to be two or three hearings per week, once the preliminary hearings have been disposed of. The trial will stretch for many months.
Another curiosity of the Italian system is that the defendant has no obligation to show his face. Mr Berlusconi has made only a handful of appearances at his numerous trials.
Thanks to new rules set by Mr Berlusconi's government, the trial must be completed within 10 years of the crime, probably July 2007.
But that means not just the first trial but two subsequent appeals. In Italy, a verdict is not valid until confirmed by the court of cassation, the court of final appeal. Few believe there is any chance of this case reaching a conclusion within that time.
- 1 Vatican told to pay taxes as Italy tackles budget crisis
- 2 Pete Doherty: I was a bit unhinged
- 3 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 4 Greeks rage at erosion of sovereignty while leaders haggle over deal
- 5 Swiss to launch a space 'janitor'
- 6 Energy watchdog tells big firms: cut prices or else
- 7 Hey, You've got to hide your drug away
- 1 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 2 Vatican told to pay taxes as Italy tackles budget crisis
- 3 The West Bank's Bobby Sands
- 4 Prehistoric cybermen? Sardinia's lost warriors rise from the dust
- 5 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 6 Female teachers accused of giving boys lower marks
- 7 The artist vandalising advertising with poetry
- 8 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 9 Mark Steel: If religion is 'marginal', I'm the Pope
- 10 Can you master a language in a weekend?
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
Wilderness and wildlife in Australia’s Top End
48 Hours: Marrakech
Bear with Bern for Swiss skiing
The West Bank's Bobby Sands
A very good cuppa: Restaurants embrace afternoon tea tradition




Comments