The Big Question: What's behind the latest crackdown on the Mafia, and can it achieve anything?
Thursday, 2 October 2008
AFP/GETTY IMAGES
Giuseppina Nappa, the wife of an alleged Mafia crime boss, is arrested this week as police get tough on the clan's killings in the Naples area
Why are we asking this now?
Five hundred soldiers will be dispatched to the province of Caserta, north of Naples, on Saturday as part of the biggest government crackdown on organised crime for years. It follows a multi-pronged assault on the same area earlier this week in which more than 100 alleged gangsters were arrested and 100 million euros' worth of property confiscated.
Roberto Maroni, Italy's interior minister, has described the struggle against organised crime as a war, and this week's action conveys the same sense of determination and resoluteness that was manifested in Sicily in 1992, after the assassinations of the crusading anti-Mafia magistrates Giovanni Falcone and Paolo Borsellino.
This week's crackdown took place near Naples. But isn't the Mafia a Sicilian phenomenon?
It's true that Sicily is where the word originated and the place where organised crime is still perhaps most deeply entrenched, but the rest of southern Italy has mafias of its own, some of which are today at least as prosperous, well-entrenched and dangerous as their Sicilian cousins.
The most deep-rooted and currently successful is believed to be the 'ndrangheta of Calabria, where the tight family structure of the gangs militates against the emergence of "penitenti" (supergrasses). But the Camorra, the mafia of Naples and surrounding areas, is the wildest, most unpredictable and most violent of all.
So who exactly were the police targeting?
The particular target of the government's actions this week is a "crazed splinter group", as the government defines it, of one particular clan of the Camorra, the ancient and still thriving mafia of Naples, a splinter group of young thugs fuelled by "pitilessness, cocaine and thirst for power" as Corriere della Sera put it yesterday, and who are believed to have killed at least 16 people in their home province in the past five months.
In the massacre two weeks ago that provoked the crackdown, six Africans and an Italian were shot dead in cold blood, for no clear reason other than to spread terror. The victims were not enemies or hold-outs against the gang but merely friendless strangers ripe to be bullied in the most bloodthirsty way, indicated that these killers thought they could get away with anything.
Apart from the bloodshed, what sort of threat do these people pose to Italy?
As Mr Maroni has stressed, what is happening in Campania (the region of which Naples is the capital) generally and in Caserta in particular is a sustained attempt by the gangs to wrest control of the territory from the hands of the state so that the criminals can kill, intimidate and extort without fear of the consequences.
Of course the state and its institutions still exist in these places. There are elected governments, local government offices, police stations and the rest, but as years go by and the blackmail of the gangs does its corrosive work, all these become hollowed out, empty shells whose functionaries, elected representatives and entrepreneurs are all (with brave and lonely exceptions) in varying degrees at the beck and call of the Mob.
How does the most recent massacre fit into this process?
The impudence of the massacre of the Africans told the central government that in Caserta this process was already far advanced: And as is traditional for all Italy's criminal gangs, the Sicilian Mafia in particular, they seem to have managed to persuade themselves that they were the true patriots, doing their plucky best to improve the country. It is likely that the killers of the Africans were motivated by the desire to cleanse their coast of immigrants, making it safe for new (gang-sanctioned) holiday resort investment.
So Caserta can relax now, with the state back in charge?
Hardly. The crackdown is the easy bit. All the really tough challenges lie ahead, in trying to unbundle the mob from the institutions. Nothing in Italy's recent history suggests this is an easy thing to achieve.
But it worked in Sicily, didn't it?
The Sicilian Mafia received a powerful blow when the Italian state reacted vigorously to the murder of the two magistrates in 1992, but the true reason that the Mafia apparently disappeared was a change of strategy by the incoming capo di capi, Bernardo Provenzano, who reversed the aggressive policy of his predecessor, Salvatore Riina, and required his underlings to do their work with the minimum of violence. The strategy worked in Sicily for two reasons: the fact that, after the destruction of rival gangs by the Corleonesi, Provenzano enjoyed the closest thing to absolute power that a mafioso could hope for; and the fact that Sicilians as a whole were so in awe of the Mafia that the resort to violence was rarely required.
So is that the sort of effect we can expect now in Campania?
In your dreams. The Camorra, unlike the Sicilian Mafia, is a wildly anarchic, constantly mutating hell of rival gangs which have been in bloody strife with each other for years. If one gang – the splinter of the Casalesi blamed for the recent rash of murders – is locked away, it is likely that others will quickly pour in to take their place. That's why more than 100 thugs were picked up yesterday, of which only three are held responsible for the recent spate of killings: the rest were held preventively, to stop them piling into the departed gangsters' territory.
Isn't this quite a change in the Italian government's attitude given Silvio Berlusconi's past record?
Quite so. Berlusconi once, long before he entered politics, hired a high-ranking Sicilian mafioso as stable hand at his villa north of Milan. One of his oldest and closest political and business associates, Marcello dell'Utri, a Sicilian, is appealing a conviction and long prison sentence for Mafia association. Berlusconi has in the past availed himself of the right not to answer questions on his alleged links with the Mafia. But new claims have been made recently. The weekly news magazine L'Espresso published two blistering scoops in recent weeks, leaking the testimony of a Camorra supergrass who claimed that Berlusconi's success in solving Naples's chronic rubbish problem was thanks to the cooperation of the Mob – and named the local politician who he said was the middle man.
What was the response to these stories?
They were quickly rubbished by the politician in question. The response of the state was to send the Guardia di Finanza, Italy's much feared Tax Police, into the offices of L'Espresso journalists to carry out a thorough (and thoroughly disruptive) investigation of their accounts.
Will the Italian government bring the Mafia to heel?
Yes...
* Southern Italians are fed up with organised crime and welcome the assault on it
* New confidence in the power of the state will encourage resistance to the Mob
* The courts will deal the Mob a resounding blow, as they did in Sicily in the Nineties
No...
* After years of dominance, the gangs are too deeply entrenched to be shifted now
* Few people in the south can believe the government is in earnest after so little action for so long
* In the middle of a recession, Italy cannot spare the resources required to deal with the problem
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited

Comments
24 Comments
in italy all the powers are into gangsters' hands
Posted by blogattelle | 04.10.08, 16:33 GMT
"...a sustained attempt by the gangs to wrest control of the territory from the hands of the state"? Places like Casal di Principe, Secondigliano, Caserta have for decades had no state presence. The real reason these gangs are strutting their stuff is this: with only the Camorra offering anything like a state presence, criminality is seen as the only way to operate. In part this is because the Italian state itself works like an oganised crime syndicate: public works go through a bewlidering number of agencies and sub-agancies , each one filtering off a little of the cash, sometimes dealing directly with mafia-style groups. Heads of government have always been suspected of mafia inovlvement: andreotti, carxi, now berlusconi. Big industry, supporters of Berlusconi in tha main, happily use mafia-run firms to dispose of their waste. These are the real problems and all of them centre of the said and unsaid collusion between state and mafia that exists in Italy.
Posted by SNightingale | 04.10.08, 14:45 GMT
I tend to be extremely pessimistic. The camorristi spring up like weeds in their home territory & are firmly entrenched elsewhere. Roberto Saviano's book GOMORRA (GOMORRAH in the English translation) is probably the best work on the Camorra. Matteo Garrone's award-winning film of the same name is still playing to utter silence in Italian cinemas. It has been submitted as Italy's Oscar entry & should soon be playing in a cinema near you. Read the book, see the film.
Naples44 is definitely worth reading but that's another story.
Posted by calendulacat | 03.10.08, 17:31 GMT
Who exactly is answering these questions? In italy we all laugh at these foreign journalists who think they know something of Italy.
The "indipendent" should hire people who know how to do their job. I am not a fan of Berlusconi, but the point of view of the article is absolutely "not indipendent" at all. Furthermore, many things are false:
1) the person hired as stableman by Berlusconi was not a "high ranking mafioso" but only a person that years after he was working in those stables came out that he knew some mafiosi.
I am italian, I have friends from Sicily. I can guarantee you that it's almost impossible to find someone who doesn't know a mafioso. (Doing business with them is something else). Did the stable man do business with a mafioso?
Anybody with some brain would understand that a "high ranking mafioso" would not work as stableman but do some other kind of business.
2) about the tax Police sent by Berlusconi ah! ah! ah!
Wake up and smell the coffee Indipendent!
Posted by Antonio | 03.10.08, 15:15 GMT
This comment is intended to assist those too easily swayed by emotion-led, sanctimonious commenters who appear to dominate the Independent's Comment Sections.
Ref the sentence in my 02.10.08, 14:26 GMT comment: "Even the Mafia do not kill for no reason. Black African males entering Europe illegally are not innocent!"
I had also stated: The [Italian] state authorities don't seem to have the will to fight the problem, probably because of EU meddling from Brussels.
I stand by those words. The Mafia always have reasons for killing someone. Those illegal Black immigrants were almost certainly up to no good themselves. They trod arrogantly on someone else's turf (twice over).
Let me put this to U. Had wave upon wave of white males landed on the coast of Africa & then attempted to do in cities, what too many African illegals attempt to do in EU (local women, crime, hustling) they would be hacked to pieces with matchets. I trust this perspective makes my earlier point clear.
Posted by Errol Flynn | 03.10.08, 08:40 GMT
GiorgioNYC [02.10.08, 22:13 GMT] ... If you truly believe Italy needs illegal immigration, and U are an Italian living in New York, then I'm not sure what Italians living in Italy might think about that.
Furthermore, Italy has a responsibility to the rest of Europe as it is obviously a frontier country. When Italy fails to stem the tide, the costs can soon be transferred to countries elsewhere in Europe. Do you agree?
"I suggest you stop polluting this blog with your ugly, uninformed crap and start reading the ... "
Ugly? Are you mad? My facts have been sourced from reliable sources over a 3 year + time period. Furthermore, I have witnessed some of what I have reported (vis-a-vis African illegals) first hand.
"Italian American organized crime is a shadow of what it once was. It doesn't control ... "
Yes, U are correct!
I wrote earlier: "The Mob (organized crime) both Italian and Jewish, have shaped the American political landscape."
That is past tense. See it now?
Posted by Errol Flynn | 03.10.08, 07:38 GMT
Wobin dear, you are a left-wing nutter. You have Nazis & Hitler on the Brain. We must assume your favourite wet dream is to be surrounded by tall blond men in black shirts & leather boots.
Wobin, I wrote earlier that if it was your real name, who cares?
When creeps like you respond to posters like me they offer three strategies: they launch ad hominem attacks, they whine on about "conspiracy theories," or they use silly attack labels like "Nazi," "anti-Semite," and "Fascist."
They never respond with cogent arguments, facts, or verifiable sources ... because they don't have any.
You & your kind need psychological counselling, or some kind of mental therapy. You are infantile to an astonishing degree, have been totally brainwashed by political junk, and are weighed down by self-loathing. In a real world, you wouldn't survive longer than a few months.
Never consider yourself a man, Wobin. I don't know what you are, but I do know you and your kind are beneath contempt.
Posted by Errol Flynn | 03.10.08, 07:23 GMT
So it seems to me Berlusconi is damned if his government does something against the horrible Camorra and Mafia, damned if he doesn't. Typical left-wing journalism. You may as well join the Espresso and Repubblica snobbish wine-sippers, chain-smoking gangs and depict him with a tail, horns and pitchfork, laughing at us from within hell's flames. Any link with the Mafia and Camorra MUST be severely fought and there does seem to be grey areas concerning him - or his entourage - and the organized crime, which is a source of shame to those, like me, who have been counting on the right to bury over the plethora of lies, populism, tolerance of unproductivity, crime and laziness in the name of ideology that the left has always supported (I grew up in "red" Bologna, I should know). As for immigrants, the majority simply appear not to have any respect for the country they're in, perhaps because many Italians don't, either.
Posted by Picchio | 03.10.08, 06:40 GMT
Oh, and by the way "Errol", not everything in this life is a conspiracy, much as you seem to wish otherwise. The Nazis believed everything was a conspiracy too...
Posted by Robin Cowley | 02.10.08, 22:50 GMT
Hey, "Errol", this is my real name, although for obvious reasons I'm not going to give you any details to check. As for the insults... those that give them out and can't take them are really rather... sad, aren't they? And a joke about my name? Pathetic. A substitute for reasoned argument. Your only weapon is a descent into vitriol, and I note that others have found you out too.
One day, when you substitute thought for hate, you might be able to hold an argument. However, at the moment you seem only to be able to contradict yourself. Read back what you've written and spot your own inconsistencies. Pointing out the gaps in your arguments is akin to shooting fish in a barrel, on this and other subjects. Are you sure you wouldn't feel more comfortable reading the Daily Mail...?
Posted by Robin Cowley | 02.10.08, 22:47 GMT
24 Comments