World

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 14° London Hi 15°C / Lo 8°C

The postman who wants to deliver the end of capitalism

By John Lichfield in Paris

Olivier Besancenot, the French far-left politician who is rapidly becoming an icon, has perfect working-class credentials as a postman

Rex Features

Olivier Besancenot, the French far-left politician who is rapidly becoming an icon, has perfect working-class credentials as a postman

He has the cheerful, inoffensive look of the ageing star of a boy-band. He wants to destroy the institutions of the French state but cultivates, brilliantly, the image of a concerned, plain-talking, working-class boy-next-door. He has become the second most popular political figure in France, after President Nicolas Sarkozy.

The baby-faced postman and Trotskyist idol of the young, Olivier Besancenot, 34, will launch this weekend something which has been, until now, a contradiction in terms: a mass-appeal, far-left party. The Ligue Communiste Revolutionnaire (LCR) is dead. Long live the Nouveau Parti Anti-Capitaliste (NPA).

The party, which plans to build a non-capitalist state and is looking, first of all, for a catchier name, will be founded during a three-day conference starting on Friday at Saint Denis, just north of Paris. With the world's financial system in crisis and with bankers universally loathed, with the working class restless and the French parties of the centre-left rudderless and divided, there could hardly be a better time to launch a radical new movement of the left.

M. Besancenot's old party, despite its workerist rhetoric, was mostly middle-aged and middle class. The new party to be born this weekend will be younger and will include some working-class, trade union activists but will be dominated by the "lost" generations of French middle-class youth who reject middle-class ideas – extreme ecologists, feminists and anti-globalists, people who are fiercely in favour of illegal immigrants or fiercely opposed to advertising.

The NPA already claims almost 9,000 members. This is three times as many as the outgoing LCR, the most powerful of the many French Trotskyist groups, which will "dissolve itself" tomorrow to provide the organisational structure and the leader of the new party.

Above all, the leader. The NPA – or whatever it finally calls itself – is unashamedly a vehicle for the personality and communication skills of the LCR's "spokesman" M. Besancenot. Le petit facteur (the little postman) with the clean-cut looks and jargon-free language was the political revelation of the 2002 and 2007 presidential elections.

In 2007, he won, with 4.1 per cent of the vote in the first round, an election-within-the-election on the left-of-the-left, crushing the once powerful Parti Communiste and two Trotskyist rivals. He is now credited by pollsters with up to 18 per cent of voting preferences – something unheard of for the far left, even in France.

M. Besancenot is in effect, engaged in a kind of political ju-jitsu: trying to overturn the modern, Western world by using the personality and media-driven politics that he and his supporters profess to detest. He is accepted by most French people as a sincere, cheerful working-class boy, a postman with a cause – a kind of "feelgood facteur".

This approach is not entirely popular with some diehard Trots in the old LCR, who accuse M. Besancenot of abandoning serious political "struggle" for a dangerous, careerist escapade. M. Besancenot's rise also terrifies the traditional left-wing "parties of government", the Parti Socialiste and Parti Communiste.

He intrigues and amuses – or once amused – President Sarkozy, who sees him as a kind of Jean-Marie Le Pen of the far left. In other words, M. Besancenot could split, rather than crystallise, the opposition to Sarkozyism and make moderate centre-left politics unworkable for years to come.

As the swell of recessionary anger grows, the President, and the French right, are beginning to regard M. Besancenot with less affection. Right-wing internet sites have been full in recent weeks of allegations that M. Besancenot is a fake-proletarian, who has a wealthy wife and secretly lives a luxurious lifestyle.

Most of these allegations are distorted or untrue. M. Besancenot does not have a wealthy wife and does not live in a posh apartment. In a broader sense, the claims do have some truth.

Olivier Besancenot is a self-made proletarian. He was born into a middle class family in the Hauts-de-Seine, just west of Paris, which was also the childhood home of Nicolas Sarkozy. His father is a physics teacher and his mother is a school psychologist. He has a degree in history from the University of Nanterre.

He became a postman in 1997 (a clever choice for a proletarian career; everyone loves a postman). He still works part-time for La Poste, delivering mail by bicycle three days a week in Neuilly-sur-Seine, just west of Paris. Neuilly, ironically, is the wealthiest and most right-wing town in France. Its former mayor is President Sarkozy.

M. Besancenot is married to a successful, but not especially wealthy, publishing executive. They have one small child. He plays football in his spare time and loves rap music (which has replaced the L'Internationale and other traditional songs of "struggle" at his public meetings).

He is never seen in the old far-left uniform of leather jacket or shapeless jumper and beard. He defies the Trotskyist stereotype epitomised by Arlette Laguiller, the perpetual presidential candidate of the other principal far-left movement, the sect-like Lutte Ouvrière. M. Besancenot wears well-fitting jeans and a black or white T-shirt. His hair is always short.

Before the 2002 presidential election, M. Besancenot was almost unknown, an assistant to the co-founder of the LCR, Alain Krivine. Since M. Krivine has been part of the French political landscape since the May 1968 student revolt, it was long assumed that M. Besancenot was just a pretty face and front man.

Careful watchers of the far left in France now believe that M. Besancenot has become not only the figure-head of the new movement but its principal driving force and strategist.

What does the new party stand for? The choice of a bland "provisional" name is significant. The words "communist" or "revolution" were excluded as "old-fashioned" and off-putting to the one-cause radicals that the new party wants to attract.

The NPA website also tells a tale. There is nothing to explain in Trotskyist detail what the ideology of the party is. Instead, the site lists dozens of approved causes, from anti-nuclear to pro-Palestine.

M. Besancenot says that the party is democratic but wants to overturn "pseudo-democratic" institutions and give people control of their own lives. This means getting rid of the market economy, starting with the nationalisation of the banks into a single "state banking service".

Asked this week if he is still a "revolutionary", M. Besancenot said: "More than ever. We want our ideas to govern, but not through the present institutions."

Asked if he is a "Trotskyist" (an allegiance which he has not claimed publicly for several years), he said: "Our political logic is to take the best of the different traditions of the working-class movement, whether it be Trotskyism, Socialism, Communism, libertarianism, Guevarism, or radical environmentalism."

This scattergun approach has been contested by a minority within the LCR, distressed at seeing their political movement dissolved overnight. Christian Picquet, the leader of the rebels, argues that M. Besancenot should try instead to create a coalition of all the disparate parties of the far left.

By merging the LCR in a new movement open to all "anonymous" members of freelance radical causes, he argues, M. Besancenot is helping to "de-politicise" public life and blurring the pure lines of ideological allegiance: something that Nicolas Sarkozy has also been accused of.

In the best traditions of Trotskyist life, the rebellious M. Picquet has been dismissed from the leadership role that he had held in the LCR for two decades.

But what if he is wrong? What if M. Besancenot has merely invented a new form of Trotskyist "entryism"? Trotskyist "entryists", or moles, disguised themselves as moderate members of mainstream parties. M. Besancenot is, arguably, trying to create a kind of "political entryism by an entire party". He has cleverly re-packaged radical politics for a disaffected, but non-ideological, age.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

The new anticapitalist party in action
[info]johncmullen1960 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 04:48 am (UTC)
I am a delegate to the founding conference of the NPA. Most of Mr Lichfield's article is accurate, but there are two things I would like to correct. Olivier Besancenot is not the party's major strategist - nobody thinks that. But much more important, the party is not first and foremost about elections. Its 400 sections around the country have been active building the protests for Gaza, getting different unions to work together in the mass strikes, building the lecturers' strike which is closing half French universities this week. For the NPA, it is mass mobilization which gets results, more surely than elections, as students showed a couple of years back when they made the government withdraw the hated First Employment Contract.

John Mullen
Equitable Trading
[info]dostoyevsky01 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 07:52 am (UTC)
John

I am not sure Anti Capitalism is such a great idea. The problem - as we are seeing now in the financial crisis - is wealth distribution and wealth acquisition.

I have an idea which could help.`
http://www.pure-mint.com/et/index.html

I would welcome your input.
Cheers

A
[info]older_greek wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 08:59 am (UTC)
Surely the 'revolutionary situation' in the West as Marx foresaw it must now be ripe from West to East which is already largely red but the US/UK sponsored dictatorships and kingdoms
Preserve our barricades!
[info]comradekaff wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 09:09 am (UTC)
B plus for the extra effort John has recently put into his research.
Johncmullen has pointed out vital aspects that Lichfield hasn't noticed or been told about, namely that the LCR/NPA is a party that concentrates on public demonstration and street protest, and they are formidably efficient and energetic in this area. Getting elected is not a priority for them, but protesting is.
And this brings me to my point, being that the national hobby in France (albeit mainly for fonctionnaires) is to moan and protest and to cock a snook at Authority, and then to feel righteous about it. Demonstrating is also one of a few shared phenomena that unifies large parts of the French public (which is normally subdued and bordering on the depressive), demonstrating makes them feel heroic. So of course these French like anyone they perceive as a rebel, so Besancenot is popular because he embodies this love of protest and outraged worthiness, but this does not mean they'd vote for him. However, while these fonctionnaires protest, they don't want radical change, they want to preserve their comforts that after all have been made possible by a capitalist society.
I would love to go on, but I don't want to give Lichfield more insight than he deserves.
Re: Preserve our barricades!
[info]forjustice13 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 11:46 am (UTC)
Dear Sir,

It's a shame but you build your way of thinking with cliches. It is not a hobby for French people, and for civil servants, to protest and to be on strike (sorry for my possible mistakes). It's untrue to say that civil servants have such a comfort (many of them earn about 1000 euros a month!) and if they have had something like a less risky way, it was not given "by a capitalist society", but first by their efficiency (and by the Gaullists and communists and all what dit the Conseil National of the Resistance after the War to preserve a kind of independance). Now about our hobby, you probably know we are one of the richest countries in the world, ok... Also one worker out of two earns 1,500 euros a month. I'm sorry but the 'liberal' society of your dream and his basic injustice is now in the wall. We could try to find other solutions. Best regards.
Re: Preserve our barricades!
[info]comradekaff wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 12:13 pm (UTC)
Je vous remercie pour vos commentaires, j'aime faire de la provoque!
Sérieusement, je connais beacoup d'hypocrytes de fonctionnaires en France qui sont beaucoup plus friqués que moi (500 livres par mois) qui tiennent un discours de change et de justice, mais qui crachent (métaphoriquement) dans des gueulles des précaires etc. Se sont des gens qui apprécient leurs belles maisons, une à Rennes l'autre sur le côte, et leurs voitures et motos, et cuisines équipées. Ils ne supporteraient jamais la révolution qui devraient avoir lieu en France, aussi bien qu'en Angleterre.
Votre Anglais est excellent.
I suggest...
[info]liveon35mm wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 11:20 am (UTC)
To have a look at last 15 years of Nepal history.
The only place in the world were a revolutionary party did it all way through the government. With guerrilla and mobilization. Go on...

and decide for a better name....

The decline of the british empire
http://valueless.wordpress.com/
Anti-capitalism.
[info]richardofeire wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 11:20 am (UTC)
Capitalism is for all to see, a failed entity.
Capitalism rewards those people who contribute nothing to their fellow human.
Capitalism is based on greed.
Creating wealth ? Yes, but only for the individual making the money, from the labour of others.
Capitalism has to be outlawed, it is far too distructive.
All people must be given the opportunity for self fullfillment, that can only come about through sharing.
The capitalist creed is wholly devisive and is an afront to human decency.
Richard O,Connell.



Re: Anti-capitalism.
[info]noelh wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 02:06 pm (UTC)
"Creating wealth ? Yes, but only for the individual making the money, from the labour of others."

Doesn't it create wealth for the person doing the labour (unless you're suggesting they're slaves)? Isn't there also an argument that there are jobs that exist because of capitalism that would never exist under government.

Surely it depends on the kind of person you are, I don't think you can categorically say that capitalism or communism are right and wrong. I love my work to the point where I want to go into business for myself, I'm setting up this in my evenings and weekends even after doing the same thing for 8 hours during the day. Shouldn't I have the freedom to get the rewards from my own effort.
Political Entryism....an alternative way?
[info]ivordunmoanin wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 11:36 am (UTC)
Political Entryism by an entire party...now there's an idea:
http://wannabepm.blogspot.com/2008/10/polly-and-ivor-go-live.html
Let's see...a re-packaged politics for the disaffected, de-ploliticising public life, a coalition of disparate parties, taking the best of different traditions? Olivier sounds my kind of guy. Out with the old and in with a brave new age, I say. Come on...there's a rebel in all of us, but are we radical enough to join the revolution? You know you want to really...DARE YOU!
Ivor XX
PS Not sure about his aversion to shapeless jumpers and beards....maybe I'm a closet Trotsky? I'd better just check.
amusant
[info]mrloon wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 12:57 pm (UTC)
"feelgood facteur" - love it.
The Fear Mongering
[info]copycat7 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 01:07 pm (UTC)
I notice a lot of articles in the press lately desperatly trying to demonize all leftist parties as "extreem left". Also these article desperatly try to create a link with hitler or starlin. Why dont the Capitalists just give way to democracy and let the people have a socialist state. Socilism is the majority opinion. Yet it has always been oppressed by the minority of capitalists.
[info]uanime5 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 01:36 pm (UTC)
This part is doomed to failure. The wide variety of different groups means that even if they achieve any success and have to engage in real politics they'll split along various political groups they belong to and form separate parties to further these interests.
Independent not better than the French media...
[info]oliandco wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 07:42 pm (UTC)
Another friendly article about M. Besancenot, but in the English media this time... I thought the English newspapers were more clever than the French ones... Sure M. Besancenot is at least as good as M. Sarkosy in dealing with his communication, but his program is far from clear, and the journalists
(from both France and England now) don't seem to be interested in that. Are they still journalists anyway ?...
laughing american
[info]americanobadass wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 08:18 pm (UTC)
france is a absolute turdhole full of lazy good for nothing people who "live off the west" america

france has no resorces of its own its a parasite in the truest-form

keep your socialist state in the end it will collapse

we americans laugh at you french and you arrogant lazy elitist attitude

every america see's that the fed is owned by the "bank of england" we will get rid of the federal reserve every american see's the oil pipelines going to france-england we now know who pushed for the war in iraq afghanistan we know it was to get england and france resorces we know geo politics and know its for you
every american see's that france and england both have commited genocides and now act like they are innocent in history while complaining about america

you can only fill up a lifeboat so full before it sinks
i hate you french and english people with the uttermost vile contempt
you great glorious socialist state will never western europe is the plague to the world its started all wars for resorces and thinks we are foolish enough not realize this
Europe Is Finished
[info]dirkdiggler34 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 08:54 pm (UTC)
With vermin like this on the rise, it's no wonder that Europe will be a Muslim superstate within 25 years. good riddance especially to the snotty, arrogant, cowardly French. I look forward to their forced conversion to Islam.
Lazy French
[info]dirkdiggler34 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 08:58 pm (UTC)
The French are lazy, arrogant, Leftist cowards who blame America for everything yet forget, that if it wasn't for America they would be a colony of Germany. Thank God that the French will soon be forced to convert to Islam, since they have allowed millions of Muslims in who are slowly taking over. Good riddance to these arrogant frogs.
Re: Lazy French
[info]uschavista wrote:
Wednesday, 4 February 2009 at 11:35 pm (UTC)
Go back to your trailer in Arkansas and keep stockpiling that ammo, DirkDiggler (a name you no doubt assumed out of insecurity over your manly shortcomings). Let me guess: you followed the link from Rense.com to get here, correct? Buffoons like you give the rest of us, the true Americans, a bad name. I cringe every time I read such stupidity posted on message boards for the world to see. It only reinforces the image we have of ignorant, arrogant, loud children, an image we owe to hicks like you. What M. Besancenot, Hugo Chavez, and Evo Morales represent is the future. Not simply the future of Europe or of Latin America, but of the world -- and yes, of the United States. I have no doubt that were Thomas Jefferson alive today he would support Besancenot and company wholeheartedly. Jefferson hated capitalism, Dirk, and warned of its dangers to the Republic, a fact you could quickly verify by stretching your brain to its limits by performing, say, five minutes of Internet research.

One wonders whatever will you do, Dirk, as you watch capitalism die forever over the next decade. You obviously hate yourself, to sing the praises of a system that rapes you and everyone you know every day. Perhaps you should just do the rest of us a great favor by spending one of your precious Glock rounds on yourself, thereby improving the gene pool. After all, it doesn't sound like you really want to live in the world that is coming upon us all, and soon.
Re: Lazy French
[info]uschavista wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 12:13 am (UTC)
Oh, I forgot to add that Jefferson was a great Francophile, and held particular esteem for French philosophers (Rousseau, Voltaire, et al). Chew on that, Dirk.
Re: Lazy French
[info]uschavista wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 01:01 am (UTC)
I also forgot to add that americanobadass is even more of an idiotic embarrassment to my country than DirkDiggler, if such a thing is possible. I think that's all for now. Thank you.
Re: Lazy French
[info]dirkdiggler34 wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 01:25 am (UTC)
You Commie scumbags are the real disgrace to America. The only good Commie is a dead Commie. Venezuela under your hero is a cesspool of violence and terrorism against those who oppose him, is that the utopia you envision for America? It will never happen. Real Americans will kill every one of you Commies first. you can count on that.
Re: Lazy French
[info]dirkdiggler34 wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 01:23 am (UTC)
Keep dreaming. The tin pot dictator Chavez and his lapdog Morales will fail, like every other two bit Communist has failed, because they serve a bankrupt ideology. It is people like you who are a disgrace, I'll bet you were an Osama voter right? There will be no resurgence of Communism. Keep living in your pathetic dream world. You're probably one of those green haired freak losers who protest against everything that made America great. If Jefferson were alive he's execute idiots like you for your stupididty and treasonous actions.
The postman who wants to deliver the end of capitalism
[info]onlytomas wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 09:17 pm (UTC)
It seems to me that he is working as a postman out of choice. He is clearly educated and from a middle-class family and may be, just maybe he is doing it, because he believes in it. I also find it strange that he continue to work in an area, which is manly populated by the people opposing to his ideas. Whatever his political agenda, he picked the right time, as many people have lost confidence due to current crisis and are looking for new ideas. Tom from buy to let mortgage.
[info]rachel_rackoon wrote:
Wednesday, 18 November 2009 at 08:14 pm (UTC)
Yes but communism is a nice idea. And Paul Marx was right up till now, so surely his prediction fits? Peronally, I think that people are too greedy and materialistic for communism to totally happen. And this man is so much more credible and trusting, I believe in him.
Rachel
wet puppy food

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date