World

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 9° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

World gets its first gay leader

Former air hostess to be sworn in as Icelandic premier after economic collapse

By Peter Popham

Johanna Sigurdardottir is Iceland's new Prime Minister

Johanna Sigurdardottir is Iceland's new Prime Minister

The first government collapse of the global economic crisis is about to yield the world's first openly-gay leader. Johanna Sigurdardottir, a former air hostess, is expected to be sworn in as Iceland's Prime Minister by the end of the week.

Her moment in the international spotlight comes at the most horrendous moment in her nation's recent history. As the global meltdown began, the collapse of Iceland's grossly over-leveraged economy was followed smartly by the implosion of its banks and currency. Now its government has gone the same way, the first to succumb to the backwash from the crisis.

Ms Sigurdardottir's party, the Social Democrat Alliance, was asked to form a new government but its leader is taking a leave of absence to recover from treatment for a benign tumour. And so, "Saint Johanna", as she has come to be known, has been propelled from the social affairs ministry – which she has presided over for a decade – to take centre stage in a choice hailed as "unexpected but brilliant".

The 66-year-old politician lives with her partner, Jonina Leosdottir, a journalist and playwright. The couple were joined in a civil ceremony in 2002. Don't expect them to show up togetherfor photocalls, however – that's not the Icelandic way. Though she is famous across the island, having been a top politician for years, her lesbian union was no big deal in this calmly progressive nation of only 300,000 people.

"Johanna is a very private person," said an Icelandic government source. "A lot of people didn't even know she was gay. When they learn about it people tend to shrug and say, 'Oh'. That's not to say they are not interested; they are interested in who she's living with – but no more so than if she was a man living with a woman."

Ms Sigurdardottir has two grown-up sons. She entered politics via the labour movement, was first elected to parliament in 1978 and was given her first ministerial office in 1987. She will be Prime Minister of a minority caretaker government composed of her Social Democratic Alliance and the Left-Greens, with outside support. It is only expected to hold office for two or three months, until fresh elections are called.

"In opinion polls Johanna has repeatedly been chosen as the most popular politician in Iceland," said the government source. "She is a good choice, because one of the problems the government is facing is lack of trust. Getting Johanna to become Prime Minister was a way of saying trust is an issue. Politicians want a fresh mandate from the electorate and, before they get it, they need to rebuild trust. Choosing Johanna is a way of saying, 'Let's bridge this gap, let's have peace to be able to implement the emergency measures'."

Geir Haarde, the former prime minister, endured months of angry protests over his poor handling of the economy; demonstrators pelted his car with eggs and police were forced to use tear gas on the streets for the first time in 50 years. Compare that to a poll in November that gave Ms Sigurdardottir a 73 per cent approval rating, she was the only minister to improve on the previous year's score.

"She is often described as the only politician who really cares about the little guy," wrote Icelandic journalist Iris Erlingsdottir in a blog this week.

She did stand for the leadership of her party back in 1994 and lost badly, but in her concession speech she predicted "my time will come". And some 15 years later, it truly has.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
Icelandic PM
[info]fide_et_opera wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 12:42 am (UTC)
She may be gay but she is not the head of state. She is the head of government. In a parliamentary republic, the president is the head of state, much like Her Majesty is our head of state. (Do you get it?) It is disheartening to read such obvious mistakes made in matters of kindergarten civics.
Wasn't George W. Bush the first gay head of state? James I?
Re: Icelandic PM
[info]usabrigade wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 08:17 pm (UTC)
Bush is not openly gay. He may be bi, as are many from his generation, but it won't be long before a US president admits to having had tried gay sex in college. But I'm sure he'll insist he didn't swallow. (alla Clinton's admission he "tried" pot in college but didn't inhale.)
Re: Icelandic PM - [info]bonavent - Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 10:31 pm (UTC) Expand
What about King Edward the 2nd ?
[info]mounty1 wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 02:01 am (UTC)
I think he predates Ms Sigurdardottir by a year or two.
Re: What about King Edward the 2nd ?
[info]therapy4dasoul wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 03:00 am (UTC)
I wonder (stretching my brain here) if the article MIGHT just be talking about openly gay leaders?
True progress!!!
[info]samb_uk wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 02:20 am (UTC)
This is quite inspirational. The fact that we, as a global community - at least in the enlightened regions of the globe - are putting behind racial and sexual differences and writing history with the first black President in the United States and the first gay president in Iceland.

Re: True progress!!!
[info]fukkafyla wrote:
Saturday, 31 January 2009 at 06:53 am (UTC)
Prime minister. Not president.
The title of this article.
[info]vicowzcky wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 02:55 am (UTC)
"Former air hostess to be sworn in as Icelandic premier after economic collapse"
Former air hostess? Who cares. I think it's a little bit demeaning to represent Johanna Sigurdardottir, one of Iceland's most active and unselfishly dedicated politician, in a way that makes readers think a rookie is taking over head office in Iceland. Not all politicians must be born rich, or even be rich for that matter.
I'm Icelandic but I didn't know about her sexuality until yesterday, it's good for Iceland to have the worlds first lesbian head of state, we need a steady handed truck driver to lead us out of this economic fiasco.
But the best thing about whole situation is that the mammon corrupted right wing politicians are out, and a person they never listed to or respected is taking over their place. And the fact that this makes them ever so angry, just puts a big smile on my face.
Re: The title of this article.
[info]alwarming wrote:
Monday, 2 February 2009 at 09:46 am (UTC)
Is it possible that the "air hostess" tag is demeaning in your [make it "Our] minds and should be viewed so.

Many important people have begun their careers not involving important decision making. It's the end of the journey and the journey itself that matters not the beginnings.


Boy,
[info]therapy4dasoul wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 02:58 am (UTC)
I thought the Independent was a progressive newspaper but on reading Loop and cold's (if ever a name fitted...) contribution I thought I'd stumbled upon Vatican Weekly, or perhaps the BNP's latest newsletter. Fascinating to see what toads hide behind their computers to relieve the inadequacy of their daily life, wher people don't want to listen to them. Conrats Independent, you've given them a forum. Moderator anyone?
heads should roll
[info]oarinput wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 03:04 am (UTC)
To follow up fide et opera, yes, a very stupid mistake. Headline writers appear to be the dimmest people on newspaper staff (note that the error does not appear in the body of the story), often writing rubbish.
correction
[info]jamal1234 wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 04:40 am (UTC)
The Prime Minister of a country is the "Head of Government", not the "Head of State" as stated in this article's title.
Re: correction
[info]ripoldindi wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 08:11 am (UTC)
The Independent isn't the paper it was since they got that new editor a few years ago. I've been very disapointed in it since.
It used to be for example the only paper with a sane outlook on Cannabis but they "changed their mind" openly a few years ago. This is not how the Independent used to be having opinions from varying standpoint for and against, how can an entire newspaper change its mind on the basis of the flimsy evidence they put forward at time point to external influences.
There seems to be bigots and people who will happily be pushed by money and political presure at the top of this paper now.

RIP Old Independent
Stop Press
[info]comradekaff wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 09:08 am (UTC)
There's a French minister who "came out", Roger Karoutchi, Secretary of State for Parliamentary Affairs (more or less).
The news broke on Friday 23rd Jan 2009. I'd heard he'd had enought of living part of his life in secret. What heterosexual has to keep their heterosexuality quite after all? "So what?" said members of the UMP - except that people are usually ghastly in their speculations about those who keep their private lives private - in my experience it's much easier coming out, it stops nasty gossip.
Nice to know we are everywhere.
gay heads
[info]wadegrimbly wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 10:15 am (UTC)
you seem to be forgetting Ted Heath although technically he was not head of state nor open about it. And whoever wrote this article doesn't know his shakespear.
Wade
Re: gay heads
[info]brainbiter wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 05:09 pm (UTC)
On what grounds does WadeGrimbly impugn Mr Heath's reputation? Because he wasn't married? Since Heath never confirmed or even spoke about his sexuality (unlike the miserable sex-obsessed mob in this and other liberal papers) I'm inclined to wonder at the sheer unashamed stereotying - and thus liberal hyopcrisy - of it all.

Funny how far we've come in liberating ourselves from Victorian morality. Once upon a time two blokes living together were simply defraying living costs. Similarly two unmarried women. No-one cared. No one gossiped. Suspicions, where there were any, were kept private betwen adults.

Today all is different. Indeed a predisposition to sticking one's dick up another man's rear is enough to be awarded one's own televison programme (and at taxpayer's expense). Mr Grimbly's error is thus to follow the lead of all the dreary bum-boys in projecting their own sordid tastes on to others in order to feel better about themselves. As an aunt of mine once said after I'd tried to explain the way of the modern world, 'Well they might be gay - but can't they go in and close the door?' Quite.

I'm sure this lady will make a fine politician (and you can interpret that as you wish). But it is surely an oddity that having followed instructions to 'grow up' about such matters our exciting new society has never been more smuttily, busybodyingly obsessed with who is doing what to whom and with inevitable consequences for individual privacy. Conservatives could have told you this would happen. But then conservatives think. If liberals could think they woudn't be liberals.

'The Lobby' excuses itself and its infantile preoccupations with all that is irrelevant and vulgar with the clarion cry of 'genetics'. If so they should ask themselves why, if homosexuality is excused on grounds of genetic, revulsion towards it isn't just as amenable to the same explanation?

You see? They don't think. Now I'm off to read the sports section. Some bigot is bound to stamp his queenly feet and demand this post be removed so I might as well scoot before I get tempted to take on some of the other keyboard warriors.....

Re: gay heads - [info]vicowzcky - Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 06:52 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: gay heads - [info]steerpike66 - Friday, 30 January 2009 at 07:28 am (UTC) Expand
Re: gay heads - [info]brainbiter - Friday, 30 January 2009 at 09:14 am (UTC) Expand
Re: gay heads - [info]vauxhall1964 - Friday, 30 January 2009 at 01:39 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: gay heads - [info]brainbiter - Sunday, 1 February 2009 at 12:57 am (UTC) Expand
Re: gay heads - [info]steerpike66 - Friday, 30 January 2009 at 02:12 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: gay heads - [info]brainbiter - Sunday, 1 February 2009 at 01:38 am (UTC) Expand
Re: gay heads - [info]steerpike66 - Friday, 30 January 2009 at 07:31 am (UTC) Expand
Re: gay heads - [info]brainbiter - Friday, 30 January 2009 at 10:17 am (UTC) Expand
Re: gay heads - [info]steerpike66 - Friday, 30 January 2009 at 07:34 am (UTC) Expand
Re: gay heads - [info]metrojordan - Sunday, 1 February 2009 at 04:39 am (UTC) Expand
Probably not the first gay premier
[info]allmyidentities wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 11:46 am (UTC)
My friends here in Thailand inform me that when Thaksin Shinawatra became the prime minister of Thailand, people were wondering 'oh my... the first straight PM in decades - what'll become of it?'
Not quite
[info]vinceg wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 11:47 am (UTC)
Perhaps 'openly gay' is more appropriate. I'm sure there have been many closet gays in power in many countries through history. I can think of the Reverend Canaan Banana the first post indepedence President of Zimbabwe (while Mugabe was still PM) who was subsequentluy hounded by the arch gay basher Mugabe (whom is hence unlikely to invite the new Icelandic PM on a state visit methinks).
First gay leader? I don't think so
[info]antoineclarke wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 12:35 pm (UTC)
England has had several gay kings, as far back as William Rufus, so the headline is wrong. I'm sure other countries have had them too.

It seems rather sexist to run this headline.
Re: First gay leader? I don't think so
[info]outlesbian wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 07:47 pm (UTC)
Out Gay, is different then closeted kings.
Edward II's relationship with Gaveston
[info]neil_mcgowan wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 01:38 pm (UTC)
was hardly a closely-kept secret.

Pace Marlowe and others. But vicarious tittle-tattle and innuendo make a great substitute for content, and sell better :(

Frankly I wouldn't care if Gordon Brown's preferred sexual partner was a sheep, if only he were capable of running the country in a way acceptable to those who (didn't) vote for him.

But he can't. Heterosexuality is no indicator of de facto ability.

Nor is being gay. Look at Condoleeza Rice as an example of a deceitful, lying, bigotry-driven disaster, for example.
loopy comment
[info]vauxhall1964 wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 01:52 pm (UTC)
@ drug baron

Are you actually on drugs by any chance? Medication perhaps? You should be reading the Daily Star...that's the level you're at.
Icelandic PM
[info]darkshelves wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 06:27 pm (UTC)
Add "gay" to any story and people will look and comment. It's the easiest put down in the world! Put a half dressed women on the page and it has the same effect. What about putting a bonus in front of a banker - should we all look and comment? How about a bowl of food in front of someone who has lost there life savings?
Congratulations
[info]outlesbian wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 07:45 pm (UTC)
Imagine, Being a World Leader Based on Ability and Skill and not on Who You Choose to Spend your Life with. America, a Free Nation, I don't really think so. Great Job Iceland. OutLesbian.com
Re: Congratulations
[info]guidosdaddy wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 07:55 pm (UTC)
Typical Left Wing anti-American commentary. What does this story have to do with the US anyway? Why does EVERYTHING twist into an excuse to bash Americans. Firstly, this woman was not voted into office by the people of iceland. She was appointed, as are most PMs in parliamentary systems. Secondly, American voters have been elected openly gay senators and mayors for decades. The governor of Rhode Island is openy gay, and he's quite attractive too, if I might add. So cram it, you marxist blowhole lesbo!
Re: Congratulations - [info]neil_mcgowan - Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 08:17 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Congratulations - [info]nakedcanuck - Friday, 30 January 2009 at 01:59 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Congratulations - [info]neil_mcgowan - Friday, 30 January 2009 at 05:05 am (UTC) Expand
You're just an antiAmerican socialist without a brain - [info]vikramdsouza - Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 08:10 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Congratulations - [info]vikramdsouza - Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 08:14 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Congratulations - [info]dpapaccio - Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 08:50 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: Congratulations - [info]nakedcanuck - Friday, 30 January 2009 at 02:09 am (UTC) Expand
Hurray!!
[info]guidosdaddy wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 07:51 pm (UTC)
Does this mean we can go back to bashing the United States for being "so far behind Europe"???
The first OPENLY GAY
[info]moholy_nagy wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 08:00 pm (UTC)
Actually, not the first... The first OPENLY GAY. Just in the UK and England before that, there was Edward Heath, the PM between 1970 and 1974. How about William II, Richard I (the Lionheart), Edward II and James I?
Bye Bye!
[info]dpapaccio wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 09:06 pm (UTC)
Too close to home. This is why I'm packing up and leaving for Australia.
Re: Bye Bye!
[info]robertclondon wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 09:51 pm (UTC)
Just remember the 70s slogan: Lesbians are everywhere. Even Australia has dykes. You can run from us gay people, but you can't hide... We're coming to get you, watch out! Nyahahahaha...(manic laughter)
Icelandic PM
[info]browny1757 wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 09:16 pm (UTC)
I think she looks ace for her age
Her name...
[info]arwel_p wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 10:33 pm (UTC)
The Independent seems to have got in a right mess about her name. She's not "Ms Sigurdardottir" - that sixth letter is an eth (ð) not a "d", and "Sigurðardóttir" is not a surname anyway, but her patronym. Like most Icelanders, she should be referred to by her first name, "Jóhanna" - try looking up the Reykjavik phone book someday to see how they organise themselves!

Curiously, the outgoing Prime Minister Geir Haarde was one of the few Icelanders who it is correct to refer to as "Mr Haarde" since his father was Norwegian, and Haarde is a surname in his case.
Who cares!
[info]nakedcanuck wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 11:11 pm (UTC)
The people of Missoula, Montana, which has a population of about 50,000 in a very rustic, rural state, elected in a landslide an openly gay police chief (an Iraqi veteran I might add) and I'd say that is far more sign of progress than a lesbian being appointed by a small parliament.
Re: Who cares!
[info]vicowzcky wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 12:39 am (UTC)
The population of Iceland is more than 6 times that of Missoula, Montana. And I don't think an openly gay police chief poses as much significance to the gay community as an openly gay head of Government, not even if he is an Iraqi veteran in George Bush's America. Now is he was an openly gay IRAQI police chief in America, that would be something.
Re: Who cares! - [info]nakedcanuck - Friday, 30 January 2009 at 01:57 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Who cares! - [info]vicowzcky - Friday, 30 January 2009 at 03:43 am (UTC) Expand
Enlightened?
[info]jingleberries wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 11:50 pm (UTC)
True progress!!!
[info]samb_uk wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 02:20 am (UTC)
This is quite inspirational. The fact that we, as a global community - at least in the enlightened regions of the globe - are putting behind racial and sexual differences and writing history with the first black President in the United States and the first gay president in Iceland.

-----------------------------------------

Don't you mean the enlightened parts which like to live off the unenlightened rest of the planet?
Sigurdardotti as Prime Minister
[info]arthur_ide wrote:
Thursday, 29 January 2009 at 11:57 pm (UTC)
The fact that Sigurdardottir has the respect and admiration of the Icelandic people is critical to the nation's recovery. The fact that she is a lesbian has no relevance--save to show that there is a nation that does not limit the right to love or whom to love--and proves that Iceland is far ahead of its time and first in the world to know what truly matters. UK, USA, and other nations have long denied their own climb to greatness by denying the rights of homosexuals (male and female) because of antiquated and church-based laws that hinder progress and deny basic civil rights. I salute Iceland, and if I were younger, I would move to Iceland in a heart beat, as Iceland has proven now that it is first in the world in all ways. A hearty applause for the Icelanders and the wonderful and great nation of Iceland.
Re: Sigurdardotti as Prime Minister
[info]hramirez wrote:
Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 06:07 pm (UTC)
it is important!! A distorted mind will lead to a distorted vision and then a distorted result.
Re: Sigurdardotti as Prime Minister - [info]arthur_ide - Thursday, 5 February 2009 at 07:17 pm (UTC) Expand
An experienced and respected politician as PM
[info]reykvikingur wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 12:02 am (UTC)
I never thought I would suspect the Independent of beeing homophobic and racist.

Iceland is getting a Prime Minister with years of experience as minister, decades as parlamentarian. A seasond labor union leader with a good standing in the grassroots.
Johanna is respected and trusted as a person. She has integrity and forecefulness that many people value. I am not a supporter of her party but I sincerely hope and wish she will succeed.

Iceland has been lucky before. Ex-President Vigdis Finnbogadottir was a remarkable president, a single woman, who is cherished by a large part of the population.
Former hostess label is innapropriate.
[info]moofar wrote:
Friday, 30 January 2009 at 06:32 pm (UTC)
"she is famous across the island, having been a top politician for years", calling her a former hostess in the first sentance or so is very poor journalism.
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Most popular in Europe

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date