France is urged to restrict migrants
Wednesday 17 April 1996
Introducing the report yesterday, the commission's chairman, centre- right MP Jean-Pierre Philibert, said illegal immigrants in France could number anything between 250,000 and 600,000 (though some say it is lower) and constituted a drain on the country's economy, particularly on its health care budget. The recommendation is that people without residence papers should in future qualify only for emergency health-care and treatment for contagious diseases. He conjured up a picture of illegal immigrants basking in a profusion of free medical treatments courtesy of the French taxpayer.
Tougher sanctions would also be introduced for those found to be employing illegal aliens, including the removal of a legal residence permit from all those involved that would open the way to deportation. Only parents - not uncles and siblings - would be able to register children for a school place, and under-age delinquents could find themselves deported into the care of their home country's social services.
The report was met with furious objections from the political left - the four Socialist members of the commission refused to endorse it - and immigrant support groups, and mild approval from the far-right National Front, which said the recommendations were "on the right track" but did not go far enough.
A number of the recommendations, however, appeared to embarrass even sections of the mainstream political right. The chairman of the parliamentary legislative affairs committee, Pierre Mazeaud warned that he could not subscribe to all the proposals and care would have to be taken to ensure the constitutional rights were not violated. These include the rights to education, health and family life. All these caveats mean the report's recommendations will probably not become law in their current form.
They do, however, serve a political purpose, which is to convince the French public that the government is serious about combating illegal immigration. The silence on the issue of immigration from mainstream candidates was widely seen as a reason why the National Front took a record 15.15 per cent of the vote in the presidential election and took control of three city councils in the municipal elections that followed.
The tough stance taken by the French interior ministry since Mr Chirac's election, which has included security checks introduced in the wake of last summer's terrorist bombings - and applied largely to people of north African appearance, has led some critics to say that the government is doing the National Front's job for it.
A report for the UN Human Rights Commission published in Geneva last week spoke of a "wave of xenophobia and racism" sweeping France that was "highly prejudicial" to its claim to be the "homeland of human rights".
- 1 Howard Jacobson: Let's see the 'criticism' of Israel for what it really is
- 2 Instagram of US airport security chiefs: Lipstick knives and IED training kits among items seized
- 4 PornHub begs users to stop uploading video clips of Brazil getting beaten 7-1
Sustained immigration has not harmed Britons' employment, say government advisers
Australia facing international condemnation after turning around Sri Lankans at sea
7/7 memorial defaced on anniversary of 2005 attacks with ‘Blair lied thousands died’ graffiti
Even when it brutalises one of its own teenage citizens, America is helpless against Israel
There’s a nasty smell in the political air – and it’s coming from the Tories
Vanessa Feltz criticises 'vile' reaction to Rolf Harris allegations
£60000 - £75000 per annum: Harrington Starr: Business Analyst Consultant (Fina...
£60000 per annum: Harrington Starr: A leading provider in investment managemen...
£600 - £700 per day: Harrington Starr: AVS, JVS Openlink Endur Developer JVS, ...
£45000 - £60000 per annum + competitive: Progressive Recruitment: Exciting opp...