Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

How the Iran nuclear deal dispute mechanism works

Michelle Nichols,John Irish
Monday 20 January 2020 20:40 GMT
Comments
(Reuters)

Iran said it could quit the global nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty if European countries refer it to the UN security council for scaling back its commitments under its 2015 nuclear pact with world powers, which the United States quit in 2018.

France, Britain and Germany formally triggered the agreement’s dispute mechanism this month, the strongest step they have taken so far to enforce a deal under which Iran was offered sanctions relief in return for curbing its nuclear work.

Donald Trump reimposed US sanctions on Iran after pulling Washington out of the pact.

After months of announcing gradual steps to reduce compliance, Iran said on 6 January it would scrap all limits on enriching uranium, saying the Europeans had failed to ensure Iran received the economic benefits promised in the deal.

The dispute resolution process takes up to 65 days to play out unless extended by consensus.

  1. Referral to the joint commission

    If any party to the nuclear deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPoA), believes another party is not upholding their commitments they can refer the issue to a joint commission, whose members are Iran, Russia, China, Germany, France, Britain and the European Union. (The United States was a member before it withdrew from the deal.)

    The joint commission would then have 15 days to resolve the issue, unless it agrees by consensus to extend the time period.

  2. Referral to foreign ministers

    If any party believes the matter has not been resolved after that first step, they can refer it to the foreign ministers of the parties to the deal. The ministers would have 15 days to resolve the issue, unless they agree by consensus to extend the time period.

    In parallel with - or in lieu of - consideration by foreign ministers, the complaining party or the party accused of non-compliance could also ask for the issue be looked at by a three-member advisory board. The participants to the dispute would each appoint a member and the third member would be independent.

    The advisory board must provide a non-binding opinion within 15 days.

  3. Review by the joint commission

    If the issue is not resolved during the initial 30-day process, the joint commission has five days to consider any advisory board opinion in a bid to settle the dispute.

  4. Complaining party takes action

    If the complaining party is not satisfied after this and considers the matter to “constitute significant non-performance”, that party could “treat the unresolved issue as grounds to cease performing its commitments under this JCPoA in whole or in part”.

    The complaining party could also notify the 15-member UN security council that the issue constitutes “significant non-performance”. In the notification the party must describe the good-faith efforts made to exhaust the joint commission dispute resolution process.

  5. UN security council votes on a resolution

    Once the complaining party notifies the security council, the body must vote within 30 days on a resolution to continue Iran's sanctions relief. A resolution needs nine votes in favour and no vetoes by the United States, Russia, China, Britain or France to pass.

    Reuters

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in