Paper convicted over 'Mugabe wedding'
Thursday 10 August 1995
The magistrate, William Cutler, found Simbarashe Makunike, deputy editor of theFinancial Gazette and the author of the stories, guilty of defamation with actual intent.
"The accused knew very well that he had no evidence ... that it was untrue," Mr Cutler said.
Mr Mugabe has two children with Ms Marafu. But he has denied that he formalised the relationship in 1992 by marrying only months after the death of his Ghanaian wife, Sally.
Makunike said he got the story from Elleck Mashingaidze, director-general of Zimbabwe's Central Intelligence Organisation, to whom he claimed he was related.
Mr Mashingaidze denied this, however, and the magistrate said that the CIO chief gave the impression "of sincerity and truthfulness", while the reporter appeared to be "patently lying".
He added: "You appeared anti-establishment. Your attitude is that denials by anyone in authority must be dismissed. But why should denials be treated with the attitude, 'What else can you expect?' It does not appear fair at all."
He said that to imply that a High Court judge was a liar was "extremely serious", while branding a cabinet minister as untruthful could discourage donor agencies and foreign governments from having any dealings with Zimbabwe.
The magistrate said that the newspaper's editor, Trevor Ncube, had been reckless in publishing the stories, and its publisher, Elias Rusike, was found guilty as a representative of the company. Makunike, Ncube and Rusike had pleaded not guilty to the criminal defamation charges, brought by a High Court Judge, Paddington Garwe, and the Housing Minister, Enos Chikowore, over reports published in April alleging the two had witnessed the secret Mugabe remarriage.
Mr Cutler said that he would pass sentence on 17 August, after considering submissionsfrom the defence and prosecution. The state prosecutor, Bambi Hammond, urged the court to fine the three heavily, because "there was malice on their part". He rejected the defence's pleas for Z$500 (pounds 36) fines or a cautionary sentence against Rusike as paltry penalties, which trivialised the case.
Defamation is usually a civil matter in which the newspaper is sued for damages by the offended party, while criminal defamation is a rarely used charge, implying a much more serious offence.
- 1 'Cheeky' Nando's under fire for apparently coming onto a customer on Twitter
- 2 Saudi Arabia mosque bombing: Two volunteer security guards hailed as heroes for stopping Isis suicide bomber reaching worshippers
- 3 Playboy model April Summers speaks out about being a victim of revenge porn
- 4 There is something wrong but very right about this Bible illustration
- 5 iPhone 'effective power' text: how to be safe from iOS bug that lets people crash your phone
EU referendum: David Cameron's rules are a 'democratic disgrace', says French-born Scottish politician set to be denied a vote
British tourists complain that impoverished boat migrants are making holidays 'awkward' in Kos
A nation of inequality: How the UK is failing to feed its most vulnerable people
Australian man punched in the face for defending Muslim women from abuse on train
David Starkey 'tells Amal Clooney to shut up and stop over-promoting human rights'
EU referendum: David Cameron to deny EU migrants and under-18s the chance to vote
£16500 - £18500 per annum: Recruitment Genius: One of the leading Mercedes-Ben...
£27500 - £35000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is an exciting opportunity...
£19500 - £23500 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Experienced B2B Telemarketer wa...
Negotiable: Recruitment Genius: This global company are looking for two Showro...