Bush: pace of withdrawal from Iraq may have to slow
Sunday 13 January 2008
Latest in World Politics
On Facebook
From the blogs
Tyrannosaur and Drive: The difference between loneliness and being alone
The prospect of loneliness is probably one of the biggest fears that humans have to contend with. Mo...
The Woman in Black: From page, to stage, to film
Director James Watkins and screenwriter Jane Goldman discuss how they kept up the constant high leve...
The future of academic publishing
These are the most uncertain times in living memory for academic publishing. After decades of bumpin...
Books with soundtracks: no, really, this one works…
Books with soundtracks. The idea is so glaringly obvious, and so obviously feeble, that I hesitate t...
In a development that could have an impact on the US presidential race, President George Bush said yesterday that the US could slow the pace of troop withdrawals from Iraq if commanders on the ground considered it necessary.
Mr Bush, speaking in Kuwait after meeting General David Petraeus, the senior US commander in Iraq, and Ryan Crocker, the American ambassador in Baghdad, said further reductions this year, beyond the 30,000 already announced, would depend on what the general recommended. He and Mr Crocker are due to report to Congress in March.
"My attitude is, if he [Gen Petraeus] didn't want to continue the drawdown, that's fine with me, in order to make sure we succeed," Mr Bush said after the meeting. "I said to the general, 'If you want to slow her down, fine. It's up to you.'" But in an election year, such a proposal could have a tough time in Congress. Iraq is the main reason for Mr Bush's record unpopularity in the polls, and Democrats have been pushing hard, so far unsuccessfully, for faster and deeper troop cuts.
In the past week, 5,000 US and Iraqi troops have launched an offensive to clear al-Qa'ida militants from Diyala province, north of Baghdad, which the research group Iraq Body Count says is now the most violent in Iraq. But military experts have warned that pacifying Diyala, with a mixed population of Sunnis, Shias and Kurds, will be far more difficult than in Anbar – the success story of the "surge" – which is almost exclusively Sunni. Yesterday, however, the Iraqi parliament finally adopted a measure long urged by the US, aimed at reversing one of the main causes of Sunni resentment: the sacking of Baath party members from all government jobs. The way has now been cleared to reinstate them.
Mr Bush is touring Arab states to seek support for his new Middle East peace effort. One of his main tasks is to try and persuade hitherto reluctant Arab states to put political as well as financial support behind Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas during the negotiating process with Israel over the next year. Gulf states, led by Saudi Arabia, have been slow to give full backing to a process that entirely excludes Hamas, which seized full internal control of Gaza over six months ago.
The US Secretary of State, Condoleeza Rice, implicitly acknowledged the scepticism, saying she did not expect the Arab states to have a "blinding flash" in favour of it on this trip, but hoped their endorsement would come "over time".
Gulf states have shown equal lack of enthusiasm for another of Mr Bush's preoccupations: banging the drum against Iran, which he mentioned four times in his 15-minute statement after the Petraeus-Crocker meeting. Local reports said Kuwait's emir would tell Mr Bush of his concerns that a US strike on Iran would destabilise the Gulf, which is the key to world oil supplies.
A senior Omani official stressed that the members of the Gulf Co-Operation Council were seeking a negotiated solution to the crisis with Iran over its nuclear ambitions, and did not see why a country should be prevented from obtaining nuclear-generated electricity under UN supervision.
"We have excellent relations with Iran. We don't see a threat from Iran's nuclear programme and we are their next-door neighbour," the official told The Independent on Sunday. He also played down Iran's threat to close down the Strait of Hormuz in the case of a possible armed confrontation with the US, pointing out that the Iranians "would also suffer from the closure of Hormuz".
But the Gulf states believe that "we must stand firm against military intervention," the official said.
- 1 Eight arrests as Murdoch 'throws staff to the wolves'
- 2 Tributes pour in for tragic Whitney Houston
- 3 What really happened on the bridge when the Costa Concordia crashed
- 4 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 5 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 6 BBC to issue global apology for documentaries that broke rules
- 7 Are we really going to abandon the PM's new best friend?
- 1 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 2 Rothschild loses libel case, and reveals secret world of money and politics
- 3 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 4 BBC to issue global apology for documentaries that broke rules
- 5 The Top 50 Independent Schools at A-level*
- 6 Mona Lisa's 'twin sister' is discovered – 500 years late
- 7 The artist vandalising advertising with poetry
- 8 Younger Castro steers Cuba to a new revolution
- 9 Scottish town where green is beyond the pale
- 10 Cambridge students' twin tragedy
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Day In a Page
Silent revolution at the Baftas
The diva who had – and lost – it all
How Picasso won over (some of) the British


Comments