World

Rain (AM and PM) 9° London Hi 11°C / Lo 4°C

The World: A pocket history

By Christopher Lloyd


A 14-part series that attempts to make simple and accessible one of the most complex subjects imaginable will be distributed via booklets given away free with The Independent and The Independent on Sunday beginning tomorrow. Starting with the origins of the Universe itself, it traces the formation of our planet, the first stirrings of life, the shaping of the continents, the evolution of species, the birth of the human race, and the millennia of history that have led up to the sophisticated but precarious civilisations of the present day.

Part science, part history – with smatterings of geology, geography, anthropology and much else besides – this is one of the most ambitious part-works you will ever read. Based on Christopher Lloyd's acclaimed book, What on Earth Happened?, it is a unique and profoundly educational compendium of facts and theories, with which anyone with aspirations to being well-informed will want to be familiar.

But it is also, no less importantly, a gripping narrative: the enthralling tale of an invisible speck of energy that exploded 13.7 billion years ago to create our universe, our planet and our infinitely complex species. It is, in short, a compelling re-telling – in chronological order – of the most extraordinary story ever told.

This booklet begins at the beginning: with the Big Bang and the chemical, geological and biological convulsions that followed it. As the series continues over the coming fortnight, so the plot gathers pace, and the story of the planet broadens. Collect them all and you will have a unique reference resource, placing in context life, the universe and just about everything else.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Micro Maxims
[info]judyvg wrote:
Friday, 6 February 2009 at 04:02 pm (UTC)
A universe, a galaxy, a simpleton, a star
Insanity, intelligence, a stumbling block, a bar?
A row of colours mingling will all turn into brown
The higher you begin to fly, the more you will go down
Insensitive to anything makes no sense at all
Except that if you're sensitive, you risk more of a fall
Why are we here, we do not know, only that we are
And what we are, how to define? the door only ajar,
Perhaps one day, light years away the door will open wide
Just like the black holes in the sky, and we'll all slip inside.
Booklets
[info]misskaze wrote:
Saturday, 7 February 2009 at 11:27 am (UTC)
These booklets wouldn't have anything to do with the hubbub of interest in Darwin's birthday, would they?

Put them out there. All I'll say is that there are few things more dangerous than a little knowledge. I noticed on the advert on the telly that the dinosaur is destroyed by a comet or meteor. The last I heard, there are a fistful at least of these dinosaur extinction ideas, including bad digestion and other far reaching concepts. It would seem rather arrogant for the Independant to decide for us 'what really happened' as though we had a CCTV recording of these events for us to be so sure about.
Re: Booklets
[info]gerryhiles wrote:
Sunday, 8 February 2009 at 07:58 pm (UTC)
"there are few things more dangerous than a little knowledge". Agreed.

Seems that the booklets espouse "Big Bang" as a done deal, but it isn't and aspects of "Steady State" theory illustrate that, for instance, major questions remain unanswered (perhaps forever).

Evolution/Darwnism seems also to be a done deal, but that isn't either and the most responsible scientific position would be to say that Darwinism has opened a lot up, but we don't know the actual origin of species, e.g. Darwin's famous Galapogos finches did NOT illustrate speciation, just the adaptive potential of any species to environmental variations or, in the case of our own breeding of breeds of cattle etc., potentials inherent in any species. Jerseys and Aberdeen Angus' are not going to become different species ... nor Pekinese and Great Danes.

I think that the booklets are basically a good idea, but it's a pity that basic theories are put forward as facts, when they are not.



Re: Booklets
[info]sickofstupidity wrote:
Monday, 9 February 2009 at 12:17 pm (UTC)
'Seems that the booklets espouse "Big Bang" as a done deal, but it isn't and aspects of "Steady State" theory illustrate that, for instance, major questions remain unanswered (perhaps forever).'

While the exact mechanism responsible for the Big Bang is still unresolved, as is the question of what, if anything, existed before the Big Bang, the vast majority of cosmologists and theoretical physicists are agreed that the universe began in a violent explosion. We will have to wait until we have a theory of quantum gravity, or a Theory of Everything - if we ever do - before we can work out the exact details.

However, one thing on which almost everyone is now agreed is that old-fashioned 'Steady State' theories, as popularized by Fred Hoyle and his supporters up until the 1960s, are NOT a possible explanation for the origin or large-scale structure of the universe; there is no observational evidence to support them, and a lot which contradicts them, and there is no theoretical model of the Steady State universe that is as credible and as well worked-out as the Big Bang alternatives.

So we are 99% certain that Hoyle was WRONG. The universe is NOT in a Steady State - the universe (our universe, at least - let's not get into the 'multiverse'...) DID begin with a Big Bang.
Re: Booklets
[info]sickofstupidity wrote:
Monday, 9 February 2009 at 12:03 pm (UTC)
"I noticed on the advert on the telly that the dinosaur is destroyed by a comet or meteor. The last I heard, there are a fistful at least of these dinosaur extinction ideas, including bad digestion and other far reaching concepts."

It depends which mass-extinction event you're talking about, as there have been several. But if you're talking about the most 'famous' one (at least in the public's mind), 65 million years ago, then I believe there is a pretty overwhelming consensus amongst experts that it was indeed caused by a meteorite impact near the Yucatan peninsula. This is supported by both deep seismic surveying of the seabed around the suspected impact site (which indeed reveals the structure of an ancient impact crater), and the geological evidence of shocked minerals at the K-T boundary (it is currently thought that shocked minerals of this kind, and in this quantity, can only have been generated by a catastrophic meteorite impact - recent suggestions that it could have been caused by violent volcanic eruptions have been largely disproven).

Future
[info]rob_craven wrote:
Monday, 9 February 2009 at 09:46 am (UTC)
Are the facts that this article is dated "Wednesday, 6 June 2012", and was written by one "Christopher Lloyd" (start turn: Doc Brown in the "Back to the Future" franchise) at all connected?
Science education
[info]prof_use wrote:
Monday, 9 February 2009 at 01:15 pm (UTC)
I think that these booklets are a good idea. In the 150 years since the publishing if the 'origin of species' it is worrying to see the low level of the understanding of science still prevalent in the general population. Evolution is basically a beautifully simple theory which explains the huge diversity of life on this planet and its interconnectiveness. Yet people spout drivel like 'evolution can't be true as a monkey will never give birth to a human being' as an argument against it. Evolution predicts that this won't ever happen. In the USA there are people who want to teach the 'Theory of the talking snake' along side evolution as an equally valid theory. Evolution has gone through rigorous scientific challenges and remains the best explanation of how and why everything is here. Snakes have never evolved and lost a voice box. They have vestigial remains of legs which their ancestors once had but never any of the biological attributes necessary for speech. Similarly the genetic variety of humans means that we did not originate from one male and one female.
big bang
[info]kurogoetz wrote:
Monday, 9 February 2009 at 07:23 pm (UTC)
now if only someone could explain WHO,WHAT,WHERE (WWW) DID THAT LTTLE PUSH TO ACTIVATE THAT big bang. not that i would be any wiser. i am just nosey if all those wiseguys know what they are talking about.atico.ca
ca henry goetzelmann
kuro.goetz@sympatico.ca
Re: big bang
[info]sickofstupidity wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 04:27 pm (UTC)
"if only someone could explain WHO,WHAT,WHERE (WWW) DID THAT LTTLE PUSH TO ACTIVATE THAT big bang."

'WHO' is the wrong question! It assumes that the Big Bang was 'caused' by a deliberate act of some entity exhibiting consciousness and intention. But most things that happen in nature are not the result of the intentional actions of conscious entities, so why should the Big Bang have been? (Of course, if you're religious, and believe that ALL things that happen in nature ARE the result of the intentional actions of an IMAGINARY conscious entity, called God, then you are never going to accept any alternative explanation, so why should we waste our time trying to convince you otherwise?)

'WHERE' is also a meaningless question. Conventional theories assert that, before the Big Bang, there was no spacetime, so there was no 'where' in any meaningful sense. Our spacetime was born at the same instant as the Big Bang, and expanded outwards with it. But it did not expand 'into' a larger, pre-existing spacetime - it was all the spacetime there was.

'WHAT' is the only interesting and meaningful question out of those three, and it is the one we are still trying to answer - there are several competing theories about WHAT caused the Big Bang at the present time :o)

But you missed out one 'W' - 'WHY?' This is a purely philosophical question, of course. But I like the simplest answer to this - the Big Bang happened simply because it COULD - i.e. because, in nature, as the great physicist Richard Feynman once remarked, 'Anything that is not forbidden is mandatory!'
where can one get the first three?
[info]mandimetameme wrote:
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 at 03:30 pm (UTC)
'cause i missed 'em

ta fa any nifo

d

x

pst; will buy 'em all from now
Re: The classical world
[info]democracydirect wrote:
Saturday, 14 February 2009 at 12:28 pm (UTC)
I think it is ridiculous that a serious newspaper like Independent has been involved in distributing to its readers this completely uninformed and biased description of the classical world. Has the unknown historian "Christopher Lloyd" ever heard the accounts of this period by well known historians like H.D.F Kitto, John Dunn, Pierre Vidal-Naquet, Mogens Herman Hansen and others to mention just a few? Had he bothered to read them he should have known the real significance of the classical conception of democracy (which has nothing to do with what passes as "democracy" today) --a word that is not mentioned once in his account, as also that of Pericles, and of course the interrelationship of the rise of democracy to the rise of philosophy, science, art, theatre and so on. Instead, he gives a completely distorted picture of this period emphasizing the role of the militaristic regime in Sparta (indirectly connecting it to the Holocaust) and detailed descriptions of the stupidities in the Bible and its relation to the role of Jews in History, which is brought out of any proportion to its real significance in this period!
Part 2 - Missing
[info]greenstyles24 wrote:
Sunday, 15 February 2009 at 12:32 pm (UTC)
Has anyone an idea how I can get part 2 please
Re: Part 2 - Missing
[info]phesnet wrote:
Monday, 9 March 2009 at 08:28 pm (UTC)
Hi to anyone looking for back copies of The World. I contacted customer services and Hannah Nicholls sent me this helpful reply:

Thank you for your email and interest in the Independent.
Was that particular issue missing from your newspaper, or did you not manage to purchase the paper on that day?
If you did not purchase the paper, then you can order a backcopy. They are priced £1 each.
Please send a cheque for £1 made payable to 'The Independent Newspaper' to:
Customer Services
Independent Newspaper
Independent House
191 Marsh Wall
London
E14 9RS
If the supplement was missing from your paper then I will be able to post it to you free of charge. In this case please email back with your postal address and I will get one sent out to you.
Kind Regards
Hannah Nicholls
Customer Services
020 7005 2500
customerservices@independent.co.uk

Hope that helps.
Missing!
[info]rhianne22 wrote:
Monday, 16 February 2009 at 03:38 pm (UTC)
I would be very greatful if someone could help me as to where i can get my hands on the 4th, 5th and 6th copy!!
Missed Parts
[info]ryiken wrote:
Wednesday, 18 February 2009 at 04:50 pm (UTC)
Hi,

Does anyone know how to get hold of parts that I have missed?

Thanks
the world a pocket hostory
[info]gautumn wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 07:30 am (UTC)
I am a German college lecturer and was in London last weekend. When bying The Independent I got that booklet Part 9.
Would it be possible to have all these 14 booklets? It seems very interesting.
herbst@herbst-london-tours.de
the world a pocket history
[info]gautumn wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 07:32 am (UTC)
I am a College Lecturer from germany was in London last weekend, bought the Independent and got booklet Part9.
Would it be possible to have all 14? They seem very interesting.
Thanks
Kind regards
gerhard herbst
herbst@herbst-london-tours.de
BACK NUMBERS
[info]imo21 wrote:
Friday, 20 February 2009 at 09:40 am (UTC)
Because I have been ill - I have not been able to collect numbers 2 and 3 and 9 - 10 - 11 pocket histories for my grandson who loves them - how can I get back numbers, please
Thanking you for yourhelp in advance
Mrs Cate Lumby
16 Robinsin's Meadow
Ledbury
Herefordshire HR8 1SU
Re: BACK NUMBERS
[info]woolst_09 wrote:
Friday, 20 February 2009 at 12:09 pm (UTC)
I agree entirely with the sentiments of this writer and jhave been looking for a way to obtain back issues. I am missing issue nos 2,7,9 and 11. How CAN we get hold of them and will someone from The Independaent please reply to all these queries?????

We live in a small village and often the inserts do not arrive with the paper - Extremely frustrating

Please reply to annie.woolston@gmail.com
MISSED COPIES
[info]bernmar wrote:
Friday, 20 February 2009 at 11:20 am (UTC)
I see that I am not alone in wanting missed copies (seemingly at least one insert goes missing with similar series - am I being cynical that it is a ploy to get people to pay for free inserts !).

However, the Moderator (or whoever monitors these comments) has not seen fit to post a response and there seems to be no obvious link on the Indy site.

PLEASE take note and someone post a response with the details - I want only No 12 that was missing this time !

This is NOT an abusive posting - just one of frustration ! BERNARD MARTIN
The World: A Pocket History
[info]ripiyer wrote:
Saturday, 21 February 2009 at 12:17 am (UTC)
I would like to have 2 sets of all 14 parts of the series. Please let me know how I could get them?
Missing parts
[info]crcyo7 wrote:
Monday, 23 February 2009 at 11:31 am (UTC)
I want to get hold of Parts 1, 2 and 3. I'm not going to pay a fiver a pop for them on e-bay. Anyone?
where to begin(random topic)
[info]c_nial_dementia wrote:
Monday, 23 February 2009 at 11:49 am (UTC)
if the big bang were to be considered a plausable theory than we would have have to understand what caused it, rather than "biological & cosmic activity" also if there where to be an entity, intentionly creating the universe out of nothing, why would it have reason to? if we where to believe there is a "GOD", than it gives us an insight that there are many more powerfull mysterious forces at work.

also, has a member of the independant ever replyed to one of these comments?
i'm 14 and therefore hardly ever enjoy reading these booklets but this series is quite interesting.
i would also like to know if you are able to collect older parts
Booklets
[info]nukiegirl wrote:
Monday, 23 February 2009 at 06:58 pm (UTC)
As others have asked - how do we get copies of booklets we have missed - or indeed all 14 booklets? Thanks
World Pocket History series
[info]judy_brown wrote:
Tuesday, 3 March 2009 at 11:00 am (UTC)
Please make ti possible to buy missing numbers through your website. I need no. 2.
world
[info]isabella1944 wrote:
Wednesday, 6 May 2009 at 04:41 pm (UTC)
Where can I obtain these now, please?
The World A Pocket history
[info]vince3811 wrote:
Saturday, 15 August 2009 at 09:33 pm (UTC)
I have part 13 of this excellent series - how can I get hold of the rest please?
VKROJ@aol.com

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date