War memorial plan provokes a row all out of proportion
Friday 21 March 1997
This week, Bob Dole, the defeated 1996 Republican presidential candidate who was almost killed by a German shell in 1945, formally launched a campaign to raise the $100m (pounds 61m) required for a suitable tribute to the war in which "America saved the world."
Few here would disagree with that sentiment, nor with the proposed design - a plaza enclosed by a 50-foot high colonnade and an embankment planted with white roses. The problem is the chosen site, on the Washington Mall right in the middle of one of the city's - and the country's - greatest vistas, stretching from the Washington Monument to the Lincoln Memorial.
"Just like Cinderella's stepsisters whose feet were too big for the glass slipper, World War Two is simply too big for this site," Senator Bob Kerry of Nebraska, decorated Vietnam war hero and arch-foe of the proposed site, declared in a letter to the country's Battle Monuments Commission. The editor of Architecture magazine went even further: The plan, Deborah Dietsch wrote, "dishonours" the ideals represented by the Mall. But such disputes are as predictable as the imminent flowering of the cherry trees along the Potomac River.
First there was the Vietnam Veterans' Memorial, re-opening painful divisions between those who insisted it was too self-effacing, and those who believed that that war needed no memorial at all. But if Vietnam, others argued, then why not Korea? And so, a Korean War memorial was duly built. Ah, but no women were featured in Vietnam 1, it was objected. Thus the adjoining new Vietnam Womens' Memorial.
Then a squabble erupted over the shrine to Franklin Roosevelt under construction close by. In the interests of historical accuracy, should not one of America's greatest presidents be portrayed in a wheelchair and with the familiar cigarette holder jutting from his mouth? (The answers, after much debate involving the disabled and the anti-smoking lobbies: Yes, and No).
And even the Holocaust Museum, with which no-one can surely quarrel, provoked a dispute. If butchered European Jewry should be so remembered, then why not an equal museum chronicling the uprootings and extermination of the American Indian?
But Mr Dole should not be discouraged. If controversy is certain, so is the outcome. The monuments get built in the end, and everybody loves them.
- 1 Cameron's freebie to apartheid South Africa
- 2 Sherlock series 3: Benedict Cumberbatch and Martin Freeman provide teasers for the biggest comeback in British television
- 3 Is this the scariest advert ever? Japanese tyre commercial comes with its own disclaimer and health warning
- 4 Australian ultra-nationalist politician Stephanie Banister in car crash immigration TV interview
- 5 People will try to reduce Mandela to a lilting reggae tune about ‘love’. They will fail
- < Previous
- Next >
£50000 - £70000 per annum + Benefits : Harrington Starr: Senior Automation QA ...
£30000 - £40000 per annum + Bonus and Benefits: Harrington Starr: A global Con...
£31000 - £43000 per annum: Capita Education Resourcing Permanent Team: This se...
£27000 - £45000 per annum: Capita Education Resourcing Permanent Team: Lambeth...