<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"> <channel> 
	<title>The Independent - Thomas Sutcliffe RSS Feed </title> 
	<link>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/?service=Rss</link> <description> </description>


<item>
	<title>Tom Sutcliffe&#58; It&#39;s good to be strung along </title>
	<guid>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/tom-sutcliffe-its-good-to-be-strung-along-1815323.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/tom-sutcliffe-its-good-to-be-strung-along-1815323.html</link>
	<description>
<![CDATA[
			    <img src="http://www.independent.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00259/4877336_259138k.jpg" style="padding-right:5px;margin-right:5px" align="left" /> ]]>
				&#60;p&#62;There was a brief theatrical vogue&#44; some years ago now&#44; for travelling toys&#46; The scene would shift from one geographical area to another in the play and to illustrate this fact the designer would contrive to have a model train  or airplane or steam&#45;ship  trundle jerkily across the stage&#46; I quickly grew to loathe the fashion  partly because it was just a fashion and went round like measles  but also for two paradoxically opposed reasons&#46; The first was that audiences were so easily gratified by the effect&#46; Almost invariably they would give one of those collective moos that cuteness always squeezes out of a crowd  and then applaud as if it was an act of unprecedented genius to put a teeny&#45;weeny train on stage&#46; The second reason was that I wasn&#39;t nearly as immune to the charm of such moments as I would like to have been&#46; There was something about the sudden shift of perspective&#44; the reverse zoom it imposed on your point of view&#44; that had delight in it&#44; and I didn&#39;t like it&#44; in much the same way that you can fiercely resent being made to cry by a cheap tear&#45;jerker&#44; even as the tears roll down your cheeks&#46; &#60;&#47;p&#62; </description>
	<category>Thomas Sutcliffe</category>


	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Tom Sutcliffe&#58; Let&#39;s be clear about what we&#39;re eating </title>
	<guid>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/tom-sutcliffe-lets-be-clear-about-what-were-eating-1813656.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/tom-sutcliffe-lets-be-clear-about-what-were-eating-1813656.html</link>
	<description>
&#60;p&#62;It hasn&#39;t really been a good few days for this Government&#44; when it comes to the relationship between simple scientific facts and public health&#46; Their commitment to giving the people the facts doesn&#39;t apparently extend to giving them facts that might contradict current political orthodoxies&#46; But they do have a modest opportunity this week to show themselves to be on the side of useful scientific intelligence&#46; Tomorrow&#44; the House of Commons debates a 10&#45;Minute Rule Bill put forward by the Labour MP Helen Southworth&#44; in which she calls for a legal requirement for a uniform system of food labelling on the front of packaged food&#46;&#60;&#47;p&#62; </description>
	<category>Thomas Sutcliffe</category>


	<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Tom Sutcliffe&#58; It&#39;s time for tough love at the Tate </title>
	<guid>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/tom-sutcliffe-its-time-for-tough-love-at-the-tate-1807185.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/tom-sutcliffe-its-time-for-tough-love-at-the-tate-1807185.html</link>
	<description>
&#60;p&#62;I tend to think of Bullets Over Broadway when I hear about collaborative artworks&#44; Woody Allen&#39;s 1994 comedy being a near&#45;perfect parable of the ruthlessness necessary for high artistic achievement&#46; In the film&#44; a mob enforcer with only rudimentary education &#40;he burned his school down&#41; is given the job of looking after a gangster&#39;s moll who has been given a starring part in a Broadway play in return for a hefty investment&#46; &#60;&#47;p&#62; </description>
	<category>Thomas Sutcliffe</category>


	<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:00:01 +0100</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Tom Sutcliffe&#58; It&#39;s time to admit flying is a luxury </title>
	<guid>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/tom-sutcliffe-its-time-to-admit-flying-is-a-luxury-1805649.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/tom-sutcliffe-its-time-to-admit-flying-is-a-luxury-1805649.html</link>
	<description>
&#60;p&#62;Forgive me Gaia for I have sinned &#8211; or rather I&#39;m about to&#46; This weekend I&#39;m flying to Washington with a son &#8211; an 18th&#45;birthday present inspired by his passion for the West Wing &#8211; and at a stroke every climate&#45;friendly choice I&#39;ve made in the last few years has been blown&#46; No point feeling smug about driving a Toyota Pious &#40;as my children mockingly call it&#41;&#46; No real point either in wondering whether the solar water panels on the roof are ever likely to justify their existence or patting myself on the back for a quasi&#45;religious devotion to recycling&#46; I have&#44; of course&#44; paid the surcharge for a carbon offset&#44; but if I&#39;m honest I don&#39;t want to look too closely at the mechanisms of that scheme for fear of discovering that its only effectiveness is in persuading people to overcome their doubts about taking a flight in the first place&#46; And there&#39;s absolutely no good pretending that this trip is an unavoidable necessity because it isn&#39;t&#46; It&#39;s for fun and &#8211; beneath shifting and variable levels of guilt &#8211; I&#39;m looking forward to it&#46; Even the flying bit&#46; &#60;&#47;p&#62; </description>
	<category>Thomas Sutcliffe</category>


	<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:00:01 +0100</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Tom Sutcliffe&#58; When a film is not a film </title>
	<guid>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/tom-sutcliffe-when-a-film-is-not-a-film-1803287.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/tom-sutcliffe-when-a-film-is-not-a-film-1803287.html</link>
	<description>
<![CDATA[
			    <img src="http://www.independent.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00251/4776376_251418k.jpg" style="padding-right:5px;margin-right:5px" align="left" /> ]]>
				&#60;p&#62;When the Cannes organisers invited Disney&#47; Pixar to present Up as the opening film of the 2009 festival they made history&#46; It was&#44; as was widely reported at the time&#44; the first animated feature to open Cannes and the invitation was broadly treated as an acknowledgement &#8211; by the most Brahmin band of cineastes &#8211; that animated film really has acquired the status of &#34;filme&#34; &#44; not just a children&#39;s entertainment&#46; I&#39;m sure the organisers didn&#39;t regret it&#46; Up&#44; as most reviewers agreed last week&#44; is hugely enjoyable and a masterclass in a certain kind of storytelling &#8211; particularly in the wonderful opening section&#44; which compresses an entire marriage into a few poignant minutes&#46; But&#44; as I peered through my 3D glasses at the adventures of Carl and Russell&#44; I found myself thinking that what I was looking at wasn&#39;t really a film at all &#8211; but a kind of literature&#46;&#60;&#47;p&#62; </description>
	<category>Thomas Sutcliffe</category>


	<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:00:01 +0100</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Tom Sutcliffe&#58; No fair trials in the court of public opinion </title>
	<guid>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/tom-sutcliffe-no-fair-trials-in-the-court-of-public-opinion-1801809.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/tom-sutcliffe-no-fair-trials-in-the-court-of-public-opinion-1801809.html</link>
	<description>
&#60;p&#62;I heard the phrase &#34;the Court of Public Opinion&#34; quite a few times yesterday morning &#8211; prompted by interviews and discussions anticipating the fact that MPs were all going to get a letter from Sir Thomas Legg and a lot of them weren&#39;t going to like it&#46;&#60;&#47;p&#62; </description>
	<category>Thomas Sutcliffe</category>


	<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:00:01 +0100</pubDate>
</item>

</channel> </rss>


