<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"> <channel> 
	<title>The Independent - Thomas Sutcliffe RSS Feed </title> 
	<link>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/?service=Rss</link> <description> </description>


<item>
	<title>Thomas Sutcliffe&#58; The Critic</title>
	<guid>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/thomas-sutcliffe-the-critic-870365.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/thomas-sutcliffe-the-critic-870365.html</link>
	<description>&#60;p&#62;I went for a bicycle ride the other day &#38;ndash&#59; not a particularly noteworthy event&#44; although this one had a higher cultural content than most of my trips&#46; Indeed&#44; it reversed the usual rule&#44; which is that time in the saddle is one of the few periods that can be absolutely guaranteed to be culture free&#46; Travel by Tube and you feel an obligation to crunch a few pages of the latest Philip Roth&#44; or read a catalogue essay about the exhibition you&#39;ve just attended&#46; On a bike&#44; on the other hand&#44; all you can do is think &#38;ndash&#59; and most of my thoughts are taken up with how I can best avoid adding to the year&#39;s accident statistics&#46; &#60;&#47;p&#62;</description>
	<category>Thomas Sutcliffe</category>

	<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:01 +0100</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Thomas Sutcliffe&#58; Sexist&#44; racist &#38;ndash&#59; and absolutely brilliant</title>
	<guid>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/thomas-sutcliffe-sexist-racist-ndash-and-absolutely-brilliant-870840.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/thomas-sutcliffe-sexist-racist-ndash-and-absolutely-brilliant-870840.html</link>
	<description>&#60;p&#62;Fifty years ago it was cowboys that stood tall in American television&#46; Three out of five Emmy nominations for Best Dramatic Series were cowboy shows and virtually all the top rated series at the time were westerns&#46; These days&#44; if the latest Emmy nominations are any guide&#44; office politics is the new frontier&#46; With Mad Men picking up 16 nominations&#44; 30 Rock scooping 17 and Damages and the American version of The Office also in the running for America&#39;s top broadcasting awards&#44; the definition of watercooler television increasingly describes programmes for which the props department have to go out and find a watercooler&#46;&#60;&#47;p&#62;</description>
	<category>Thomas Sutcliffe</category>

	<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:01 +0100</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Thomas Sutcliffe&#58; Knife crime&#46;&#46;&#46; sensitivity or broad indifference&#63;</title>
	<guid>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/thomas-sutcliffe-knife-crime-sensitivity-or-broad-indifference-867647.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/thomas-sutcliffe-knife-crime-sensitivity-or-broad-indifference-867647.html</link>
	<description>&#60;p&#62;I saw a dispiriting newspaper placard the other day&#46; &#34;Yet another knife killing&#34; it read&#46;&#46;&#46; and this was before the weekend had added more deaths to the running total&#46; And what struck me as depressing about that poster&#44; one of those used to sell the late edition of a London daily&#44; wasn&#39;t just the information it contained&#44; but the suggestive ambiguity of the phrase that had been chosen to publicise the fact&#46; &#60;&#47;p&#62;</description>
	<category>Thomas Sutcliffe</category>

	<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:00:01 +0100</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Thomas Sutcliffe&#58; How not to end it with a bang</title>
	<guid>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/thomas-sutcliffe-how-not-to-end-it-with-a-bang-864379.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/thomas-sutcliffe-how-not-to-end-it-with-a-bang-864379.html</link>
	<description>&#60;p&#62;I can&#39;t tell a joke to save my life&#44; so please don&#39;t complain to me if I&#39;ve mangled this one&#46;&#46;&#46; which has been&#44; in any case&#44; pieced together from unlabelled fragments in my memory&#46; &#60;&#47;p&#62;</description>
	<category>Thomas Sutcliffe</category>

	<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:00:01 +0100</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Tom Sutcliffe&#58; Would the BMA deny Bond his martini&#63;</title>
	<guid>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/tom-sutcliffe-would-the-bma-deny-bond-his-martini-862012.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/tom-sutcliffe-would-the-bma-deny-bond-his-martini-862012.html</link>
	<description>&#60;p&#62;Some people&#44; it seems&#44; just don&#39;t quite understand how drama works&#46; First we had the head of the Bar Council suggesting that Criminal Justice&#44; Peter Moffat&#39;s excellent series for BBC One&#44; should be struck from the record as inadmissible evidence&#46; It was not&#44; he explained&#44; in an indignant letter to a newspaper&#44; &#34;the basis upon which one can draw any sound conclusions about our system of justice&#34;&#46;&#60;&#47;p&#62;</description>
	<category>Thomas Sutcliffe</category>

	<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:00:01 +0100</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Thomas Sutcliffe&#58; No&#44; TV is not the novel of today</title>
	<guid>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/thomas-sutcliffe-no-tv-is-not-the-novel-of-today-859383.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/thomas-sutcliffe-no-tv-is-not-the-novel-of-today-859383.html</link>
	<description>&#60;p&#62;The BBC&#39;s controller of fiction&#44; Jane Tranter&#44; picked a good week in which to suggest that television had supplanted the role of the novel in addressing the big social issues of the day&#44; an argument she made in a speech to the Royal Television Society on Monday night&#46; Not very long after she finished speaking&#44; BBC One began transmitting Criminal Justice&#44; Peter Moffat&#39;s ambitious five&#45;part series about a young man who finds himself on remand for murder after a one&#45;night stand goes badly wrong&#46; And if the essential subject matter here wasn&#39;t startlingly original&#44; the manner of its transmission was &#38;ndash&#59; stripped through every night of the week so that those hooked by the excellent opening episode didn&#39;t have to wait too long for their next fix&#46; There have been weeks in which Tranter&#39;s jab at the established cultural hierarchies could have looked a bit unsubstantiated &#38;ndash&#59; but in this one&#44; at least&#44; she was solidly backed up by the Radio Times&#46; &#60;&#47;p&#62;</description>
	<category>Thomas Sutcliffe</category>

	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:00:01 +0100</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Thomas Sutcliffe&#58; The perilous joys of middle&#45;aged sex</title>
	<guid>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/thomas-sutcliffe-the-perilous-joys-of-middleaged-sex-857675.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/thomas-sutcliffe-the-perilous-joys-of-middleaged-sex-857675.html</link>
	<description>&#60;p&#62;Do you remember herpes&#63; You&#39;ll need to be of a certain age to conjure the particular memory I have in mind&#44; which is of the spasm of sexual anxiety that went round when the disease first really made it into the public consciousness&#44; after the incidence of infections leapt in America&#46; Yikes&#44; I can remember thinking&#46; Weeping sores &#40;routinely described as &#34;agonising&#34;&#41;&#44; no prospect of a cure&#44; the perpetual moral duty&#44; ever after&#44; to inform prospective sexual partners of your potentially hazardous condition&#46; &#60;&#47;p&#62;</description>
	<category>Thomas Sutcliffe</category>

	<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:00:01 +0100</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Thomas Sutcliffe&#58; If only they&#39;d listened to me&#46;&#46;&#46;</title>
	<guid>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/thomas-sutcliffe-if-only-theyd-listened-to-me-854746.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/thomas-sutcliffe-if-only-theyd-listened-to-me-854746.html</link>
	<description>&#60;p&#62;Artists and writers justifiably hate it when critics review the work they wished they&#39;d seen&#44; rather than the one they actually did&#46; It&#39;s understandable&#44; really&#46; Just imagine it&#46; You spend months carefully crafting a table and then you open the paper to find that someone is moaning that the seat is too high for comfort and there are no arm rests&#46; &#34;It&#39;s not meant to be a chair&#33;&#34; you would shriek&#44; &#34;It&#39;s supposed to be a bloody table&#33;&#34; And one of the things that aggravates the artist&#39;s irritation&#44; rubbing salt into the paper cut&#44; is the sense that critics are betraying themselves at such moments &#38;ndash&#59; revealing their envy for the act of creation&#46; &#60;&#47;p&#62;</description>
	<category>Thomas Sutcliffe</category>

	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:01 +0100</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Thomas Sutcliffe&#58; What&#39;s wrong if these cameras stop crime&#63;</title>
	<guid>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/thomas-sutcliffe-whats-wrong-if-these-cameras-stop-crime-852861.html</guid>
	<link>http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/columnists/thomas-sutcliffe/thomas-sutcliffe-whats-wrong-if-these-cameras-stop-crime-852861.html</link>
	<description>&#60;p&#62;The difference between a police state and a well policed one is notoriously blurry and itself requires careful policing&#46; It&#39;s all too easy for the pursuit of the latter to edge&#44; slowly and almost imperceptibly&#44; into the creation of the former&#46; But there are times when it&#39;s worth remembering that there is actually a difference &#38;ndash&#59; and that a well&#45;policed state has quite a lot of things going for it&#46;&#60;&#47;p&#62;</description>
	<category>Thomas Sutcliffe</category>

	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:00:01 +0100</pubDate>
</item>

</channel> </rss>


