Columnists

null 1° London Hi 7°C / Lo 0°C

Tracey Emin: My Life In A Column

'If any elements in my room at the Royal Academy shock, I'm happy. I want people to start feeling art, not just look at it'

Friday, 6 June 2008


Room to view: Tracey Emin's Gallery VIII at the Royal Academy Summer Show

Today I awoke, stretched out my arms and rejoiced in the fact that it is just an ordinary day. By that I mean I have to do everything that I usually have to do, like write this column, and a multitude of other tasks, but also that this is the first day in more than three weeks when I haven't had to go to the Royal Academy, or when the Academy hasn't completely absorbed my thoughts. Even now, I feel my soul is floating around Gallery VIII.

A few months ago, I was asked if I would like to curate a room at the Royal Academy Summer Exhibition. I was in Australia at the time, and the month of June seemed a long way away. And then, suddenly, a few weeks ago, the month of June came charging towards me, like a deranged elephant flapping its ears and making loud gestures with its trunk, and the daunting task of having to curate anything, let alone something so public, quite overwhelmed me as I suddenly realised I had never curated anything before.

I began by thinking about the Royal Academy: what it stands for, its history, what the summer show represents – and what I could possibly bring to it. The obvious would be what is expected of me. The title for this year's RA Summer Exhibition is Man Made, so I also began to think about what the term "man made" meant to me: Luddites, the age of mechanical reproduction, the desire of invention, science; it all seemed quite distant from me.

So I turned the expression on its head and thought about the emotions that humankind make, from fantasy to jealousy, pain and fear. I thought about the mind and how it has to deal with everyday life's confusion and emotional instalments. I wanted to create a room that could show this, and at the same time I wanted to show work that could somehow excite and create discussion about art. Something that would entice the viewer, not just into the room, but maybe into the dialogue and opinions, and maybe a change of opinion once they had left the room. I wanted to create a room at the Royal Academy that would have a longer-lasting effect than the summer show.

I wrote down a list of artists and particular works of theirs that I liked. The artists ended up being multinational, their ages ranged from 27 to 97, and the works crossed over many different media. All of the works that I chose had to go through the official channels and be cleared by the RA Summer Exhibition Hanging Committee.

For people who don't know: the Summer Exhibition is an open submission. This year, there were more than 10,000 entries. It's a show where professional artists hang alongside amateurs and its reputation literally hangs on the fact that it is totally overhung, from floor to ceiling. This has always been the style, the salon hang. Personally I find it crazy, draconian, but somehow amazing. It doesn't mean to say I was going to hang Gallery VIII (my room) like that, but I have hung high into the gods and low to the ground, and I have world-renowned artists hung next to unknown artists.

I have also taken on the tradition of the shock of Varnishing Day. This is the day when the works are first unveiled: 200 years ago Turner would have been standing there touching up the last wave; Ruskin would have been strutting his stuff, removing any evidence of pubic hair (I like to image him on his knees with a little dustpan and brush).

In the olden days, every year, the Royal Academy was plagued with some kind of scandal or another; I am happily just returning to that tradition. There are some works in Gallery VIII that I feel viewers should be warned about in advance, simply because I don't want to have the blame of somebody having a visual heart attack because they have never seen a penis before, or a zebra mounting a woman from behind. These images are appearing in an art gallery. This is a safe environment for them to take prominence on the stage, and for the audience to create discussion around them. This is what art is about, forcing us to exercise our minds and our visual capacity, but I will accept that maybe not everybody wants to.

I would love to write about all the works individually, but there isn't space and there isn't time. What I know is the pleasure I've had over the last few weeks in putting this room together: working closely with the other Royal Academicians; dressing up in all my finery and beautiful silver medal; feeling actually very proud to be a Royal Academician and having wonderful conversation with the likes of Adrian Berg RA – finding out inside information on Barbara Hepworth that you could never read about, the kind of stuff where you had to be there at the time. It's good fun seeing history, seeing it unravel, and understanding that you can play a part, if only minor, in its evolution.

If there are any elements in my room that shock, I'm very happy about this. Shock is a base word used to describe a response forced by certain emotions. I really want people to start feeling art, not just looking at it. Art is a wonderful, fantastic thing. It exists halfway between man and nature. It rests on a strange plane, somewhere else where we can take our minds, outside of the daily realm. A place of a heightened spirituality, a place where the mind can feel free to explore, mentally, emotionally and, if it wants, without even having to utter a word. As we say at the Royal Academy, with glasses raised high: "Honour and glory to the next exhibition."

Your chance to own a Tracey Emin original

The Independent is pleased to offer '21746' (2008) by Tracey Emin exclusively for readers at the special launch price of £2,800. '21746' (2008) is a white chalk pebble wrapped in a hand embroidered cotton sheet, measuring 11 x 15 x 16 cm (4 x 6 x 6.5 in). It has been published by Counter Editions, London, in an edition of 25, and comes with a certificate signed by the artist. The edition is offered on a first-come first-served basis from today, Friday 6 June. To buy '21746' (2008), telephone Counter Editions on 0207684 8888, Mon-Sat 10am-6pm. Alternatively, you can order by logging on to countereditions.com/independent and following the on-screen instructions. Delivery within the UK and VAT are included in the price. Delivery is by UPS courier and is within 28 days. For full terms and conditions about this offer, see the countereditions.com website, telephone 020 7684 8888 or email info@countereditions.com

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Whatever negative emotions t.e. may inspire that are at least emotions, also, her column appears to me undedited streams of consciousness, which is honest, open, and therefore, to my mind engaging.

Posted by Matthew Clemens-Lary | 11.06.08, 12:30 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Dear Tracey,
I´m sorry to read, that your words stirred up such a lot of negative reactions. I too think, that art should contain something uplifting, beautiful. That can be something different for everyone. A memory of something gone, finding a thought back in someones work you just had the other day? Feeling connected, mirrowed? A nice line, a beautiful material? A shape? That´s very individual, I think . A certain moral should be in the art, too. I don´t want to see creatures being tortured or being exploited sexually. I can´t see the zebra-scene, but it sound like something, that I might not like to see in an art show. ( Or anywhere else...!)
Thoughts are free, but art is material, form, it stays, must have a voice on it own without the artist standing next to it explaining.
Must strike a good chord in people, a thought or feeling being worth it to linger.
I love your picture of the date of the exhibition coming running towards you like "a deranged elephant flapping its ears"!!!

Posted by Kirsty Wahlee | 08.06.08, 22:27 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

why do you seek to shock people? is this some alternative to being genuinely creative? if talent is lacking, do you seek its substitute, in pandering to the basest emotions in the human soul? that bed of yours was an example of sheer brutal baseness, how can any sane person call such a form of disgust, art? surely we must look at the works of geniuses such as cavaleto, van gogh, da vinci, raphael, and use these as benchmarks by which we steer our own course in art. if the element of beauty is lacking, if that which uplifts the soul, raises the spirit, to new heights, that which makes us more loving compassionate people i not present in our art, then are we not due to reappraise if we are truly being artistic or merely an attention getter playing to the credulity of undeveloped and pretentious people
can we create a work of art, and place it by one of these geniuses of the past and some of the truly great may i say geniuses of the present , I can supply links where their work is found

Posted by Nick | 07.06.08, 06:15 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

'Not just look at it'???

I just offer this, if I may - since Van Gogh comes to mind - against T.E.'s noodlings:

'Van Gogh was one of the comparatively few artists whose anguish really was inextricable from his talent, which is why it is still difficult to visualize, without a twinge of nausea, one of those writhing, heat-struck visions from Arles or Saint-Remy hanging in a millionaire's drawing room. ' (Robert Hughes: 'The Shock of the new': page 270).

Among the even more jejune writing that we have in the Independent these days, I agree that it is Emin I could do without most of all.

Posted by John Foyle | 07.06.08, 02:04 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

"It rests on a strange plane, somewhere else where we can take our minds, outside of the daily realm. A place of a heightened spirituality, a place where the mind can feel free to explore, mentally, emotionally and, if it wants, without even having to utter a word."

Yes, art does that - if you're given a bit of elbow space in a gallery - but I've never experienced that at the RA. I can live without another bun-fight at a Summer Exhibition, thanks.

Why do you have to say 'as we say at the Royal Academy?'
God, embarrassing.

Posted by Amanda Hill | 06.06.08, 20:36 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

"...Art is a wonderful, fantastic thing. It exists halfway between man and nature..."

It really hurts to stumble into such rubbish in an Independent column. Enough to make a spellcheck blush.

Posted by Timothy A Weeks | 06.06.08, 20:14 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

One can but hope - and hope springs eternal - that one day Tracey will wake up in the morning, or afternoon, and decide she can no longer write this column. Oh, what joy there will be among the Indie's readership, or at least a good chunk of it that is weary of this weekly brew of utter tripe...

Posted by JohnRouse | 06.06.08, 19:19 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Yes I could have done with advanced warning about that video of the naked womans flesh being cut by her hoola dancing with a loop of barbed wire. There was nothing spiritually heightened about that piece. Seems that whenyou are a Royal Academician youre allowed to talk b *****ks in the paper as well as hang it on the walls.

Posted by notshockedtunbridge | 06.06.08, 16:51 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I love artists. Particularly when they're thinly sliced and flash fried.

Posted by 999cats+1 | 06.06.08, 13:06 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details