Commentators

null 2° London Hi 7°C / Lo 0°C

Adrian Hamilton: This meeting in Saudi Arabia won't solve oil prices

Thursday, 19 June 2008

You have to love politicians for their sheer cheek. For the last 10 years as chancellor, the Prime Minister (and for half of that period the Governor of the Bank of England) have lapped up all the international pressures bringing prices down in Britain and claimed it was the result of their own, wise policies. Now that the international pressures have all gone in the reverse direction, they're declaring that it is all to do with outside forces and nowt to do with them.

Well, what goes around comes around, as they say. For most of the last decade, commodity prices have fallen, manufactured goods from China and Asia have become cheaper while the strength of sterling has reduced import costs even further.

Now we have the opposite, with oil and food leading the charge back up the prices escalator, sterling falling and manufactured imports growing more expensive as inflation hits even the Chinese and Indian economies. And what does Gordon Brown and his Bank governor do? They blame it all on outside events beyond their control.

What is more Brown even suggests it is all the fault of the oil producers artificially restraining supply to keep up prices. Which is why he is off this weekend to Saudi Arabia to attend a meeting of producers and consumers to sort it out in a gentlemanly fashion.

But is the price of oil merely the result of artificial distortions of the market, the product of monopolistic suppliers and greedy speculators, as the Prime Minister and cabinet members are wont to suggest? Or are we seeing something far more fundamental which is going to affect our way of life and the economics of globalisation for the long term?

The first thing to be said is that Brown is right on one thing at least. Inflation is the biggest single cause of international concern at the moment and oil is at the very core of it. The effective doubling of prices within a couple of years is behind the rise in cost of fertilisers that is putting up food prices, the higher charges for transport which is ratcheting up the cost of manufactured goods, as well as the dramatic increase in heating and car costs which affects the ordinary consumer and hence their expectations and wage demands.

We have been here before, of course, during the Seventies when the doubling of prices brought about a prolonged slump in the world economy and an inflation rate that took much of the decade to sort out (it wasn't the only thing but it was crucial). Eventually higher prices brought about their own solution in increased oil production, especially in areas outside the Middle East, and lower demand.

Will the same happen this time round? The question is made more difficult because on this occasion, unlike in 1972, there is no actual shortage. The Saudis are right on that. But then are European leaders right in blaming it on speculators driving the price up in the futures market? Is Brown right in thinking it is due to the activities of the producers? Are the oil companies (not without self-interest) right in blaming it on policy distortions that hold back production investment and keep demand artificially high by subsidising the price in the developing world? Or are the environmentalists correct in attributing it to the end of the oil era as oil output peaks?

The simple answer is that no-one knows or, should you wish to be more complicated, a bit of all these things. Huge sums are being poured into the futures market but they are not purely speculative. With currencies gyrating as well as prices, investors are trying as much to protect themselves for the future as make money out of it. Although there is no absolute shortage of oil, there is a severe tightness in supply, and particular problems of demand for products such as diesel caused by such factors as the Chinese earthquake. It is not only in the paper market that prices are rocketing. They're also doing so for real cargoes of oil for immediate delivery.

Increased supply from Saudi Arabia could ease pressures and change market sentiment. But the trouble is that Saudi Arabia is virtually the only country that can raise output and even it can manage only a small percentage rise. It's promised extra 250,000 barrels per day has been known for ages. The rest of the oil producers, including the North Sea and Russia, are virtually all peaking. The one obvious medium-term saviour would be increased oil from Iraq and gas from Iran and both of those are constrained by Western policies – a subject which presumably Brown will not be bringing up with his hosts this weekend.

Indeed the meeting in Jeddah is little more than a presentation exercise to show Saudi concerns for the consuming world and the developing world in particular where it hopes to gain influence.

If in fact we are now witnessing the beginning of the end of the oil era, the question is at what price will the alternative sources of hydrocarbons and energy be brought in? The market failed to provide that answer in the Seventies. Maybe the traders and the speculators, with their paper deals and gambling ways, will manage it this time.

a.hamilton@independent.co.uk

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

12 Comments

it would not be very long when everyone realises that capitalism kills capitalism. in the quest of making tons of money (uncontrolled greed) by speculation or restricted production, this prolonged price hike for natural resources and food, would impoverish the majority of the world population and nations.

in turn, this would diminish the demand for goods and services. hence the would economy would implode. currencies would become worthless because countries with essential resources would trade or barter their resources in search of needed resources.

countries which are home to speculative ventures should rein in these 'financial' engineers before the great disaster gives us the visit !

Posted by lim yc | 23.06.08, 11:08 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Although oil appears to be a good hedge against inflation , the low dollar and low supply the truth is, supply is becoming less of an issue with a surplus possible soon. The US dollar is in a good position to rebound to the top of the heap. Why? Because the EU will drop in value. There's just too much turmoil in the European Union right now. Investors will see the US dollar as the only alternative. Inflation is the one glitch in all of this. Right now , the only thing driving inflation is high oil prices. As inflation goes higher they buy more oil driving inflation higher still. This will trigger the world recession as antontordy mentioned in his post. This will result in a lowering of gas consumption and will free up more gas supplies, perhaps even creating a surplus in my estimation. I am no expert but even I can see the writing on the wall. Investors are going to loose their shirts on oil just like the recent housing credit crunch. www.nbtv.ca

Posted by Ted M | 21.06.08, 14:29 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

No supply problems right now! Don't you just love it, the way all of our problems so neatly disappear, if for this very moment the oil market is supplied. But next year? Or the year thereafter? Or heavens forbid we think of 2015! As an oil speculator/trader/spiv/nasty I make my money trading bits of paper (which if I'm not totaly careful means I might own some real oil at the end of the month or might just have to deliver some of the real stuff). But if there were an established market for rocks I could trade that too. But what doesn't change is the fact that oil production has essentially peaked/plateaued since Jun05 and the demand has just kept going up. Hm! so I wonder where prices have gone... Meanwhile some of the asian countries are reducing or eliminating their gas subsidies so that consumers will have to pay a real market price. Which I imagine will slow the demand significantly and so effect the price. Here is one oil speculator/trader/spic/nasty who is net short this week.

Posted by J Lee | 19.06.08, 20:57 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I find it curious that no one mentions the role the automobile industry has played in this current situation. Gas guzzling huge SUVs, 200+ HP engines. Now throw in Hedge funds cornering future supply of oil. Does this sound like ENRON all over again.

What do you think?

The leaders of the freeworld (ha..free indeed) dont care as their coffers are raking in the taxes based on percentage of costs. I love it.
We are all going in concentric circles and will soon disappear up our own orifices; read arse for that.

Posted by MA | 19.06.08, 14:13 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I agree. Brown's visit to Jeddah is a pointless exercise in self-promotion and his presence is guaranteed to spoil the party.

Posted by AberDinnerJacket | 19.06.08, 13:44 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I assume that the final paragraph is irony. The only thing that traders and speculators care about is making money. They care about the underlying commodities or business only insofar as that knowledge will increase their profit. They are gamblers, but with other peoples money in some cases. They will move on to the next big thing from which to extract an unearned profit. Truly one of the glories of the free market is that it spawns both businesses that create the demand their products satisfy and the gamblers and spivs (aka merchant bankers, traders and other occupiers of desks in the city) whose parasitic existence was, until recently, touted as something of which we should be proud. Hooray for the hedge funds. They will save the day - they will.... won't they?

Posted by Bruce | 19.06.08, 11:51 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Good article Adrian. I would have liked you to crunch a few numbers though;
1/We are the 12th largest oil producer in the world (1.4 million barrels on a good day)therefore are better placed to ride out the current global difficulties.
2/ The price of oil has doubled in the last 12 months giving the treasury an unplanned windfall from increased petroleum revenue tax and corporation tax.Money that has not been commited or borrowed against.
3/ The price of petrol is 45 pence a litre at the pumps if you take away the tax (half the price of a litre of milk).
4/ Darling can afford,using increased PRT, to suspend temporarily the tax at the pumps. This would give an enormous boost to the economy.
5/ Finally a word on gas. The price is crippling the economy because it is artificially linked to the price of oil and because we have a very limited storage capacity (13 days) We export in the summer and have to import in the winter at premium prices. I could go on.

Posted by martin alexander | 19.06.08, 11:08 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Would someone like to tell me why they think Mr Brown's visit to Jeddah will have any effect whatsoever on the economic, commercial and political decisions already made in respect of the world oil market? Is not the reality that this is just a stunt designed to bolster Brown's reputation by giving the totally false impression of him flying away to rescue us - like a comic-book hero - when in fact anything that could be done is already happening through normal diplomatic channels?

Maybe there are some of the population who are still convinced by such pointless gestures, but why are politicians concerned about them? They haven't reached voting age yet.

Posted by ExcellenceFirst | 19.06.08, 10:43 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Its nice to see a serious article, rationally argued, in the Independent, which doesn't pretend to know all the answers, but which is illuminating nonetheless. Perhaps the same principles might in future be applied to your front pages?

Posted by simon | 19.06.08, 10:30 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

People don't like unpalatable truths so why should zombie politicians be different? Furthermore, it's difficult to put a positive spin on peak oil and its implications, let alone take credit for the inevitable pain of widespread pauperisation.

Posted by Tom Tucker | 19.06.08, 08:52 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

12 Comments

Columnist Comments

andrew_grice

Andrew Grice: The Chancellor must consider tax hikes.

Despite the weight on his shoulders, the Chancellor remains remarkably calm.

howard_jacobson

Howard Jacobson: The lesson of Hitler's deformity.

So Hitler actually did have only one ball. I call that a pity for history.

deborah_orr

Deborah Orr: Praising the public on pointless decisions.

People power, as it pertains to television anyway, is proving to be a tricky beast.