Commentators

Showers (AM and PM) 12° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

Andreas Whittam Smith: Forget regulation – the banks are back to business as usual

The Nationwide has introduced a mortgage for 125% of a house's value

It was supposed to be "never glad confident morning again" for capitalism. After the popping of speculative bubbles during the Great Crash of 2008, surely we weren't going to carry on as if nothing had happened? Well, I am afraid to say, ahem, yes, that it sort of looks like that.

The Chancellor of the Exchequer, Alistair Darling, announced plans to tighten up bank regulation on Wednesday that were widely denounced as feeble and the ever opportunistic George Osborne, the Shadow Chancellor, said that he would publish an alternative White Paper later this month.

Then, as if to underline the fact that nothing much has changed since the crisis, the Nationwide Building Society introduced a mortgage scheme that allows borrowers to take loans worth 125 per cent of the value of the property they are buying. It is being made available to existing borrowers whose loans already exceed the value of their homes and who want to move. Actually the best thing such borrowers could do would be to stay put or downsize and the best thing the building society could do would be to avoid excessive risk.

As for mouth-watering pay for bankers, the Chancellor recently approved the decision by the Royal Bank of Scotland to grant its new chief executive, Stephen Hester, a £10m pay deal. Mr Darling commented at the time: "I've always said that there's nothing wrong with a bonus that incentivizes people to take a long-term view and claw back if they don't actually make those requirements, and that applies from the top to the bottom of an individual bank."

Yes, indeed, but £10m? Would Mr Hester have walked away if the value of the reward had been, say, only £8m? And would it have mattered if he had departed?

So why is it business as usual? Chiefly because the big trends in trade and finance, global as they are and beyond the control of a single country, haven't changed. Fast-growing Asian economies will go on generating excessive savings that will be invested, partly at least, in Western financial markets. Globalisation will endure, only slightly inhibited by fresh protectionist measures, and will exert a downward pressure on inflation and interest rates.

Pope Benedict acknowledged these unchanging realities in his encyclical letter, "In Charity and Truth", published this week. "Economy and finance, as instruments," he wrote, "can be used badly when those at the helm are motivated by purely selfish ends. Instruments that are good in themselves can thereby be transformed into harmful ones. But it is man's darkened reason that produces these consequences, not the instrument per se. Therefore it is not the instrument that must be called to account, but individuals, their moral conscience and their personal and social responsibility."

Moreover, contrary to expectations, voters showed no inclination to give left-wing parties a special boost in the European elections that were held last month. Centre-right parties gained in Germany, France, Italy, Belgium, Britain, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain, and across most of eastern Europe. Only Sweden, Denmark and Greece were exceptions.

Electorates, thinking pragmatically, seem to have concluded that the 21 European governments of the right have not managed the crisis as badly as all that.

However, as far as pragmatism goes, nobody can outdo Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor. At a meeting of European finance ministers last week to discuss the reform of bank capital and accounting rules, her representatives lobbied for a temporary loosening. The German delegation didn't succeed, but it will try again.

The truth is that German banks are sitting on hundreds of billions of losses that they do not care to acknowledge. Fortunately that may not matter as much as it would elsewhere for the government itself and state governments own much of the system.

So instead, enthusiastically aided by the French, the Germans concentrate on trying to tighten up the regulations of financial activities in which they play a small role but which are chiefly conducted by the City of London such as hedge fund management and trading in exotic instruments like swaps and derivatives. As a result we also, equally pragmatic, stoutly defend our extensive financial sector. "Never glad confident morning again"? Probably not, but the sun will continue to shine on financial markets.

a.whittamsmith@independent.co.uk

More from Andreas Whittam Smith

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Money talks
[info]49niner wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 05:01 am (UTC)
Did we ever serious expect anything different? Money talks. Most of us don't have money so we don't count. And policians wonder why they are held in such contempt!!
those mortgages are good ones........
[info]rhysjaggar wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 10:45 am (UTC)
The 125% mortgages are designed to allow those of good credit standing to trade up despite house price falls. This is necessary to get the market going and doesn't make those people worse risks. Because the houses they want to go on to are so much cheaper now than they would be if the market were more buoyant....

This is actually an enlightened approach which shows they learned the lesson of the early 1990s.

Then, the market stagnated for years (I'm not worried about prices, I'm worried about properties simply on the market) as those who wanted to trade up were told they couldn't.

Be cautious before jumping to conclusions, Mr Whittam-Smith.............
those mortgages are good ones.....?
[info]kodak321 wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 11:25 am (UTC)
rhysjaggar, you're a prat. The purchase price may be less....but guess what?....so is the selling price. We're back into 'big' risk territory with 125% mortgages....next the 80% (first time buyer industry standard), mortgage will become 85, 90, 95....we should not be propping up an 'asset' that bankrupts our future.
Banks
[info]omirou wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 02:19 pm (UTC)
Why does it seem to be so outrageous to propose that 500,000 GBP is more than enough for anyone.
In the case of the RBS, and probably every other large bank, the remaining 9.5 million GBP could be distributed to all other employees; thereby reducing redundancy. Or if that is too crazy, shared out to all the shareholders. Or even, used to reduce costs and charges! What does it say about the priorities of the banks and other corporations that they give such an enormous amount of money to one person? One person who can only operate as one of a team? a team that may include the whole bank!
Re: Banks
[info]dumbganda wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 04:09 pm (UTC)
The CEO of Citigroup is paid US$1 a year until the bank makes a profit. Whats wrong with that? he is still one of the more respected bankers. Hester is not even a banker, no proven record in managing a bank.
those mortgages are good ones.....?
[info]kodak321 wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 02:24 pm (UTC)
Having re-read your rant.....You're either an estate agent or an old prick...who cares more about his children's (inheritance), but doesn't give a fuck about anyone else...long live egalitarianism.....
Banks and money
[info]manueljimenez wrote:
Friday, 10 July 2009 at 09:22 pm (UTC)
Andreas, there was never such a thing as regulation as we understand the meaning of the word. It comes down to linguistics as usual. By now we should know that regulators serve only the interests of the banks and the shareholders.
I suppose you could see a little altruism in the banks
[info]panchoangry wrote:
Saturday, 11 July 2009 at 04:01 am (UTC)
After all, who else was willing to throw good money after bad once real estate started to fall? Why you might even say they were heroically trying to save all those holding mortgages from realizing their losses. Of course, they didn't do it without making a profit -- they were paid to write those mortgages as they all accumulated in Fanny Mae or her sister.

Nah, the bankers have been raking in money for DECADES. When's the last time you were looking at even a 5% raise? The banks consider 5% on their money a BAD year. But it's not the bankers who create money-making opportunities, it's the entrepreneurs. But for some reason people like Obama don't see it.
I am sorry I copied this as I thought for a wee moment this man was tired but then who is not, only
[info]famulla wrote:
Sunday, 12 July 2009 at 01:39 pm (UTC)
ECB's Paramo warns on reform fatigue. I am sorry I copied this as I thought for a wee moment this man was tired but then who is not, only to find that it is ECB and I still don?t get it as most banks are having a have hell a of time
Reform of the global financial system has become bogged down as fears subside over its potential collapse, however policymakers taking their foot off the pedal threatens recovery, a leading ECB official said.
ECB Executive Board member Jose Manuel Gonzalez-Paramo also told Spanish newspaper El Pais some European Union countries should hopefully see a return to growth from mid-2010.
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
I'm not a prat Kodak.....
[info]rhysjaggar wrote:
Sunday, 12 July 2009 at 06:47 pm (UTC)
1. You don't need to take on a new mortgage if you don't want to.
2. If you do, as you wish to start a family, and you can afford it, whether its 125% or 100% isn't important.
3. With interest rates low, that will come down anyway.

You clearly aren't mature enough to decide on your own mortgage exposure.

That doesn't mean the rest of us aren't.

Sir........
[info]jonnymikeyy wrote:
Tuesday, 3 November 2009 at 09:20 pm (UTC)
A 100 mortgage is big enough talk about 125%.

Columnist Comments

hamish_mcrae

Hamish McRae: A time for giving with a difference

With the recession, there is a shift from giving people things to giving them services

mark_steel

Mark Steel: Come rain or revo- lution, it's money they want

Haven't the 20th anniversary celebrations of the overthrow of communism been miserable?

terence_blacker

Terence Blacker: Science must never be political or emotional

Politicians and action groups select favourable data, ignoring inconvenient evidence


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion