Commentators

Showers (AM and PM) 14° London Hi 14°C / Lo 8°C

Andrew Grice: The Week in Politics

In the heat of the battle, nobody is talking about climate change

Saturday, 10 May 2008

Gordon Brown, Ken Livingstone and 300 Labour councillors were not the only casualties of the local and London elections. No one seems to have noticed, but the other big losers were those people who care about the environment.

We might just look back on May Day 2008 as the moment when the power of green politics peaked and went into reverse. I hope I'm wrong, but I doubt it. The reaction of the two main parties to the elections was instructive. Desperate to prop up his own position after Labour's rout, Mr Brown needed to toss a few bones to the voters and jittery Labour backbenchers. So it suddenly emerged that he was about to dump the so-called "bin tax" – allowing councils to charge householders who do not recycle their rubbish. Downing Street didn't confirm it, and five token pilot schemes will go ahead, but it's clear the bin tax has been binned.

Brown allies also floated the idea that the 2p rise in fuel duty might be shelved again. No doubt this was an attempt to placate motorists. As well as being anti-green, it was a surprise, since the Chancellor, Alistair Darling, will need all the revenue he can get when he delivers his pre-Budget report in the autumn – not least to compensate the losers from the abolition of the 10p tax rate.

Mr Brown was not alone in relegating the environment to the back burner. David Cameron, the wind in his sails after the elections, held a prime ministerial press conference in which he set out his priorities for government. Significantly, the words "environment" and "climate change" did not appear in his 1,200-word statement.

Was this the same man who fought the local elections on the campaign slogan "vote blue, go green"? And was the leader who hugged huskies to convince us his party had changed addressing new issues and no longer preaching to the Tory converted? Green issues have gone out of fashion for Mr Cameron; they have served their purpose.

Naturally, the Tory leader denied it. "We have made quite good progress," he insisted. "I'm not saying the job is done. There is still a huge amount that we want to see changed."

But whatever happened to the impressive tome of green policies produced last year by the Tory policy review headed by John Gummer and Zac Goldsmith, who seems to have disappeared off the planet he was trying to save? When asked, Mr Cameron banged on about the fuel price pressures facing motorists and hauliers.

Officially, the Tories remain committed to raising green taxes in order to cut taxes for families. But they don't talk about it much. After a brief detour, they seem to have arrived at the same point as Mr Brown: that the public needs "carrots" as well as "sticks" to go green; that they suspect green taxes are stealth taxes.

Another reason why the elections have set back the environmental cause is the election of Boris Johnson as Mayor of London. He will dump Mr Livingstone's plan to charge drivers of gas-guzzlers £25 to enter the capital's congestion charge zone, and review its recent expansion into west London. In Manchester, the councillor behind plans for a £5 congestion charge lost his seat to a community party which opposed it.

Labour and the Tories will doubtless argue that the Manchester experience shows they are right to be cautious on green issues. Similarly, Labour MPs say the bin tax was an issue on the doorsteps in the local elections. As The Independent reported eight days ago, a new opinion poll found that more than seven out of 10 people are not prepared to pay higher taxes to fund projects to tackle climate change.

It's hardly surprising that people downgrade soft issues such as the environment when economic times are hard. Yet politicians surely have a duty to lead rather than follow public opinion. Despite that, the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs quietly shelved plans to bring in annual personal carbon allowances this week, saying the idea was "ahead of its time".

The two main parties will continue to pay lip service to green issues in the run-up to the general election. But something has changed in the past week. Both parties will put saving seats before saving the planet.

If they carry on like this, voters who still put the environment at the top of their list will have to vote Liberal Democrat or Green if they want to change the climate of British politics.

a.grice@independent.co.uk

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Post a comment

Limit: 1000 characters

View all comments that have been posted about this article

Comment
Your details

* Required field

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by Independent.co.uk's Terms of Use

L.O.L., "green" lol :lol: I would like to point out to these environMETALists that if global warming is the problem it's cracked up to be, then cars only account for 15% of it globally. This is my question to the environMETALists: What about the other friggin' 85% then!? Get a clue environMETALists :roll: All the benefits cars provide far out weighs the 15% of global emissions they provide, infact even if it was a third that would still be reasonable.

Posted by Flynn | 13.05.08, 20:31 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

The local elections provided one other very obvious indication that the 'campaign against global warming' has gone out of fashion and Andre Grice missed it. See a recent post at harmlesssky.org entitled, 'A week is a long time in the global warming debate'.


Posted by TonyN | 12.05.08, 20:43 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

If the environmentalists want to make sacrifices to rescue the planet, I say let them pay through the nose, but they try to force their crazy beliefs on everyone and make us all pay, they need to be stopped.

Posted by Bastian | 12.05.08, 12:18 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

This whole green thing is a load of nonsense. When you journalists who prettend to care so much about the environment get out of your hummers and jaguars, then maybe other people will take more notice.

Finally you watermellons and your humanity hating theroies are dying out. Good riddance.

Posted by NoToGreen | 11.05.08, 17:45 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

"It's hardly surprising that people downgrade soft issues such as the environment when economic times are hard. Yet politicians surely have a duty to lead rather than follow public opinion."

Yeah - good luck with that. The whole Green Scam is simply an exercise dreamt up by politicians to raise taxes - and I will continue to vote against any party that tries to take it seriously.

Boris Johnson (Conservative) 1,043,761 votes (1st pref)

Sian Berry (Green Scam Party) 77,374 votes (1st pref)

"If they carry on like this, voters who still put the environment at the top of their list will have to vote Liberal Democrat or Green if they want to change the climate of British politics."

Welcome to political oblivion!


Posted by Shawcross | 11.05.08, 14:48 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

You've drawn attention to another good consequence of recent political events.

Today's obsession with 'global warming' is only an example of the madness of crowds; if it remains fashionable, it will provide an excuse for causing immense damage, not least to the poor of this world.

It's reassuring to think that now serious, real problems have come to the forefront, this hype and nonsense is being quietly put to one side.

Posted by Ben Elford | 10.05.08, 21:08 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Thanks Andrew for this article. I hadn't realised the two major parties were quite so superficial on green issues. How sad; how suicidal.

As for William Hiley and the other climate change deniers: you can see the polar ice sheets melting. Perhaps you don't care about your own future, but what about your children's?

Posted by Mark D | 10.05.08, 19:47 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

thank goodness common sense has won.
the bin tax would have led to fly tipping on an
enormous scale. the oil price means there is no justification
in raising the petrol tax, and the £25 charge was just class
politics.

Posted by ian Bilbey | 10.05.08, 19:33 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Of course the other possibility is that politicians are finally waking up to the fact that the whole climate change issue is a scam perpetrated by pressure groups, and that most of the remedies being implemented as a result of hype from these groups are doing more damage to the environment and world economies than non-existent climate change ever will.

Effective government is primarily based on keeping the people scared. Since most people don't seem to be falling for the global warming hype (thank goodness), they'll need to find something else to top up the fear level.

Posted by William Hiley | 10.05.08, 13:52 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Columnist Comments

dominic_lawson

Dominic Lawson: He appears to have robotic self-discipline...

... but inside, Brown is a ferment of emotion

matthew_norman

Matthew Norman: These petty buffoons who ruled over us

How monstrously trivial things have become

joan_bakewell

Joan Bakewell: No wonder the toffs are back with a vengeance

Bling is back and I'm glad to be one of the blingers


Most popular in Opinion