Commentators

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 15° London Hi 20°C / Lo 13°C

Andrew Grice: The Week in Politics

Will Labour learn to be as ruthless as the Tories?

Saturday, 17 May 2008

In a Commons bar, Labour MPs relived a plot in the late Sixties to depose Harold Wilson, a prime minister who had lost his authority. No prizes for guessing why: the question dominating Labour minds is whether the party should soldier on with Gordon Brown or find someone else to lead them into the next election.

Mr Brown's week of frenetic activity was unkindly named "Operation Stabilise Gordon" by one former cabinet minister. The fightback has not gone entirely according to plan. On Monday, his speech on long-term care for the elderly was overshadowed by the Labour MP Frank Field's prediction that he would stand down.

Tuesday's spectacular climbdown over the 10p tax rate propped up Mr Brown's wobbly position in the Parliamentary Labour Party but inflicted further damage to his economic credibility. That £2.7bn was conjured out of thin air to repair the 10p damage and try to stave off a recession, shows the depth of the hole Mr Brown is in. As he drew up his March Budget, Alistair Darling fretted about a backlash over the abolition of the 10p rate but decided he didn't have any spare cash to deal with it. Ten weeks later, he miraculously produces £2.7bn. No doubt the goalposts will move (again) so the Government doesn't break its fiscal rules, but the damage to its reputation is done. "Whatever happened to Prudence?" one minister asked.

On Wednesday, Mr Brown unveiled a draft package of Bills for the parliamentary session starting in November. But in the real world, it was eclipsed by a chilling warning from Mervyn King, Governor of the Bank of England, that Britain could be heading towards recession.

On Thursday, the Prime Minister did an exhausting round of television and radio interviews and then took an hour of questions from journalists at Downing Street until they ran out of steam, as if to show he was still standing in the ring. Fittingly, Mr Brown even had a Wilson moment. In 1969, the Prime Minister told those plotting against him: "I know what's going on. I'm going on." Mr Brown, asked which cabinet colleagues were good enough to take over from him, said: "I'm doing the job."

So what did this frenzy achieve? John Denham, the Universities Secretary, argues on GMTV's Sunday programme tomorrow that Mr Brown has won "some space" to set out his stall to the voters. Privately, other ministers are not so sure. It's true that Labour MPs are happier bunnies than they were a week ago, the 10p boil having been lanced (for now, at least).

Mr Brown knows that in a week's time, he may be in the eye of a very big storm. I will eat my hat if Labour wins next Thursday's by-election in Crewe and Nantwich. The bigger the Tory majority – and it could be big – the bigger the Labour panic. What can Mr Brown do then? A draft Queen's Speech? Been there. Another marathon stint in the TV studios? Done that. A press conference? Don't call us. A cabinet reshuffle? It is the last card for Mr Brown to play, but there is no guarantee it would change anything. It rarely did much for Tony Blair.

What else has Mr Brown got left? "Two years," one ally told me. But has he? Limping through to the safe haven of the summer recess is the goal now, but July feels a long way away. If he can do that, he lives to fight another day, and will hope to close the opinion poll gap in the autumn. It may sound odd, but Mr Brown still hopes the economy can be his trump card when voters have to decide whether he or David Cameron should run the country, rather than whether to give Labour a kicking in council elections or Crewe.

His immediate problem is to win his "two years". Back in the Commons bar, the MPs recalled that Labour decided not to strike against Wilson, that his Chancellor, Roy Jenkins, bottled out, unwilling to wield the dagger. Traditionally, Labour shies away from regicide. The Tories are more ruthless, as Margaret Thatcher and Iain Duncan Smith, left, discovered.

If Labour MPs break with convention and move against Mr Brown, they will do so more in sorrow than anger. Most of them would be delighted to see him get back in the game. But they will be guided by what the public think of the Prime Minister. That's why Crewe matters, and is dangerous for Mr Brown.

"The public have stopped listening to Gordon," said one Labour MP who had been desperate for him to take over from Mr Blair. "The danger is that people have made up their minds about him."

Interesting? Click here to explore further

And why would anyone want to listen to a guy who talks in laundry lists, lies & never answers the question?

Brown is dead - as in Dodo.

Posted by John of Enfield | 19.05.08, 11:48 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

The Labour MP who says "The public have stopped listening to Gordon," has missed the point, totally.


For two decades I was a Party member but I’m not saddened in the slightest that Labour is squirming & is in for massive defeat at Crewe & Nantwich. In fact, the bigger defeat the better. I couldn't care less who is Captain of the ship. Substituting Miilband, Straw etc won't make one bit of difference - I want the ship sunk & fast.

Why? If being on a low income makes you working class then I'm certainly working class. For Brown to admit he was warned about the consequences of removing the 10p band but then ignore those warnings implies total disregard of me and my kind. I'm in the category that is still not fully compensated. If the Party and Brown hold me in so little regard then I will respond in kind. As a friend told me last week (a first time BNP voter) "I'm not middle class so who else could I vote for".

I thought the Labour Party & I had an unwritten contract. I was wrong.

Posted by Ted | 17.05.08, 20:38 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

The best thing about all this is the more he appears or opens his mouth the worse it gets! AND there's nobody in cabinet sufficiently able to tour the studios in his place even if they were game to step up to the plate. Are any of those new expensive advisers asking Brown to drop the stock phrases that just don't connect? "Difficult times...the right decision/hard decisions... getting on with the job...a private person...not listening to gossip...". The repetition and insincerity grates on the nerves of every voter...we know..we've just returned from 3 days in Crewe where literally no Labour voter - let alone the others - gave Mr Brown a good word or were prepared to extend the benefit of the doubt any longer. His position is totally hopeless and one can only imagine the tension inside the flat above No 10 now that PR Guru Sarah has been cast aside!

Posted by THE ESSEX BOYS | 17.05.08, 18:54 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

"Andrew, the panic will be greatest if the Liberal Democrats push Labour into third place. "

- Michael Cole | 17.05.08, 13:21 GMT

Sir, the very thought of that made my day. I leave my office smiling. Thank you very much indeed.

And as for the thought of Brown staying in power for another two years - you can bet on it, he's said he's in until the next election. Labour doesn't do regicide.
He'll stay on, stumble into the next election, and then with any luck Labour will be replaced by the Liberal Democrats as the main opposition, and if the only way to have that happen is for the Tories to win by an almightly landslide - so be it.
Labour just doesn't seem to realise that their man has the potential to cost them very, VERY dearly at the next election, espicially if the LibDems wake up and challenge them effectively on the Left.

I've heard some say that a defeat at the next election would "cleanse Labour" - it won't, it will eradicate them.

Fingers crossed.

Posted by Joe | 17.05.08, 16:39 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

'His immediate problem is to win his '2 years'.'

That's the whole problem - you and other affected ZaNu Labour supporters just don't get it, do you? It's all about him but it should be all about us!

McClown is toast, a busted flush, useless, a coward, a wimp - McCavity. I really, really fear for the future of the UK if this guy is in charge for another 2 years, He has not one clue about the economic problems facing us (after all, he is the cause of many of them!) nor the social meltdown that may be the response if things get as bad as I fear they may.

And the silly thing is that Labour think that keeping Brown in power helps. If he lasts another 2 years, the Labour party will disintegrate, splinter and NEVER get into power again.. oh, hang on, I'll take it all back.

Posted by Rob | 17.05.08, 13:27 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

"The bigger the Tory majority – and it could be big – the bigger the Labour panic."

Andrew, the panic will be greatest if the Liberal Democrats push Labour into third place.

Posted by Michael Cole | 17.05.08, 13:23 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

"The bigger the Tory majority – and it could be big – the bigger the Labour panic."

Andrew, the panic will be greatest if the Liberal Democrats push Labour into third place.

Posted by Michael Cole | 17.05.08, 13:21 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Does anyone know what's happening in Crewe? Why Labour are fighting such a completely insane campaign?

"Don't vote for the posh Toryboy who lives in a great big house, vote for Moyra Tamsin Dunwoody-Kneafsey, who's grandmother was Baroness Phillips, who lives in a bloody great house and went to the Grey Chapel School in Westminster and is the daughter of Gwynneth and therefore under the heredtitary principle is one of us"
Eh? They must think the constituents are

a) bonkers
b) so committed to Labour they are just having a laugh
c) unaware that the local party are off their heads

or - they want to lose as part of a plot to get Brown out.

Posted by John Miller | 17.05.08, 11:53 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

'MPs guided by what the public think' you must be having a larf. Now with the whiff of defeat and a hostile chattering class, once again MPs demonstrate the self-serving nature of our political class. MPs are guided, primarily, by their own self-interests. Their minds are concentrated on continuing to enjoy what must be the cushiest overpaid part-time job in the UK.

Posted by fred | 17.05.08, 08:51 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

The tawdry scrabblings at Westminster are a million miles from the real world. Our elected representatives should stop eyeing up each other's backs and get to grips with the life and death issues - Iraq, crime, disaffection, food, energy, the economy, population and climate change.

Posted by Mark D | 17.05.08, 02:01 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Columnist Comments

janet_street_porter

Editor-At-Large: Privacy is down the YouTube

Teenagers do not understand the dangers that lurk in the virtual world

john_rentoul

John Rentoul: Labour awaits The Issue to topple Brown

Labour MPs are not completely stupid when it comes to choosing a leader.

sarah_sands

Sarah Sands: Another sexist Wimbledon

Women are applauded for being "hot", and derided for being serious.


Most popular in Opinion