Christina Patterson: It's not isolation in old age that worries me
We may be lonely, miserable and scavenging in skips, but we won't be bored – because we'll be working
Saturday, 2 August 2008
The other day, when I got home from work, I tried to put a bottle of pinot grigio in the washing machine. Well, it made a nice change to the time I tried to put my book in the fridge. And, indeed, the time I left the keys to my new car hanging out of the boot. I am, it seems, to quote the Jamaican poet, Lorna Goodison, "becoming my mother".
In Stockholm, we spent hours with the police, filling out forms about the theft, at the hotel breakfast buffet, of my mother's wad of Swedish kroner. Which we later found in her suitcase. Last time it happened, she didn't call the police. From the window of the train she had got on at Clandon, she just watched the navy handbag on the station platform fade into the distance. This being Surrey, she got it back.
For the most part, however, my mother's mind is still in relatively fine fettle. It's her body that's the problem: the dodgy heart and high blood pressure and glaucoma and cataracts and sore hip and sore heels. Meals are accompanied by big piles of pills. Old age, as my great aunt used to say, is not for sissies.
If my mother and her friends are battling the body's decline on a daily basis, and fuelling the profits of the pharmaceutical industry (over 60s, according to new figures, are racking up at least 42 prescription items each a year), then at least they're doing it in quite nice houses with quite nice pensions. My mother's life is an exhausting round of reading groups, coffee parties and lunches. Sometimes, like Greta Garbo,she says she just wants to be "left alone".
And then there's us. Her wonderful offspring. We may have disgraced the family name by failing to produce little Pattersons for her to pet, cuddle and display on the mantelpiece but we do, at least, visit her – even take her on the odd mini-break, the odd little holiday. We are rewarded with a mother's love and, sometimes, cheques. The half of my father's index-linked civil service pension that she received when he died is enough to pay for lunches, and bribes. It may even be enough to pay for gas.
The inconvenient truth, however, is that I am not becoming my mother. While our minds and bodies might be set on a similar trajectory, our finances are not. I am not married to a civil servant – or, indeed, anyone. By the time I have paid for the final-salary pensions of the police, the fire service, local government and the NHS and the (unsplit) mortgage and the (unsplit) utilities, there's not much left for a bag of Doritos, let alone for the bank vault of gold bullion otherwise known as a pension. According to my annual statements from Norwich Union, my (to me) gargantuan payments will get me a monthly Mars Bar and, perhaps, a Twix.
And in failing to produce the grandchildren my mother yearned for, I have, it seems, made sure that I will indeed be "left alone". If my mother's parturition got her lunches and mini-breaks in her old age, my friends' mothers (some a little older, some a little more infirm and some, sadly, now two sandwiches short of a pensioners' picnic) got them very much more. Not just grandchildren, but regular visits, shopping, taxi services to hospital appointments and, occasionally, granny flats with nursing care attached. My friends – mostly working mothers in their 40s – are exhausted. But blood is thicker than water – particularly for a daughter.
There is, however, one silver lining in the cloud hovering over the soon-to-be-silver-haired. We may be lonely, miserable, and scavenging in skips for the crumbs from the young man's table, but we will not be bored. We won't be bored because we'll be working. The answer to the question posed by the Beatles all those years ago – will you still need me, will you still feed me – is respectively yes and no. Yes, we (the young) need you to pay our pensions. And no, we won't feed you just yet. Sixty-four? A mere stripling! According to Lord Turner, the Government's pensions supremo, we'll soon need to work until we're 70. And that, of course, is not for a nice, index-linked pension, but for the stately sum of £90.70 a week.
Quite who is going to employ us remains, at this stage, vague. Human beings over 60 are rarely regarded as the hottest of properties in the employment market place – or, in our youth-obsessed culture, anywhere else. In the brave, new world of the eternal "portfolio career", working lives that started with a flourish are more than likely to end behind a till.
"When I am an old woman I shall wear purple," wrote Jenny Joseph in her anthem for defiant old age, "Warning". "And I shall spend my pension on brandy and summer gloves/ and satin candles, and say we've no money for butter." When I first read it, I thought it was funny. Now, I'm beginning to think that wearing purple might be one of the few pleasures we can afford.
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited




Comments
17 Comments
Labour has created pensions apartheid - the wealthy public sector and the poor private sector. In time taxpayers will default on payment of these fat cat public sector pensions.
Posted by Graeme | 02.08.08, 23:52 GMT
It's incredible how the same is happening here, at the end of the world. I'm over 60 and can't think of retiring , since the pension after working all my life, is not enough to pay the bills, and I'm a professional. I don't think I'll wear purple though, it doesn't suit me!!
Posted by letil | 02.08.08, 20:43 GMT
That is exactly why I respondly rather acidically to a developers' flyer selling me a sheltered apartment with buzzer. I pointed out that what the working over 60's need is a normal 2-3 bed home with garage and garden but in an estate without kids playgrounds and ice cream vans. We all come to want a bit of peace even if we are still working? The rather dull clerk replied again saying they only build for the over 60's..(will we be working from a portal in a pokey bungalow with Vicky Pollards in and out wiping our posteriors?)
What we need is purpose built estates for older people that dont assume they are half dead, retired and have no pets, cars and visitors!
Posted by YR | 02.08.08, 16:51 GMT
Athiestboy. you said something wrong again. I do not live in England or UK. so leave that bit about people coming to UK and blaming your way of life.
And i did not say that all Asians look after their old. You are right the old are bullied there also. I said it is a dream, let me dream further. No need to get sensitive. I am an old man of 74 an may not match your sharpness.
Alan, Thanks for your comments.
Posted by sharifL | 02.08.08, 14:50 GMT
Atheistboy and sharifL,
Look. I hate patronising, so I am not going to do that to you. But I just want to point out I have been around a bit, and I found both in Asia and the USA there was an unnatural respect for chronological age, which is silly. There are both fools and sages 80 years old.
As I put it below, chronological age is not the same as psychological age. There are 80 year-olds who think like 18 year-olds, and want the things 18 year-olds want. Their human development is suspended, though I dont know why. But they never became mature adults you see.
Never mind. Just know that inside us all is a quiet voice. It is easily shouted down by day-to-day goings on, and shallow people are quite deaf to it. But it never goes away. We cannot make it shut up. My advice is listen to that beseeching, down-trodden whisper inside, for it is our true selves asking to be set free. Ignore it, and your fate is unhappiness.
Posted by Alan Robinson | 02.08.08, 14:35 GMT
SharifL - but surely, if I am arrogant I am merely mirroring your arrogance in putting forward the views that all muslims/asians treat their old folk well (and by extension all westerners/white people/non-muslims don't).
I'm afraid your idea of a whole family living together is a bit of a grass-is-greener pipedream, because in that kind of family the old folk get bullied, the children forced into marriage, the problems covered up and I would not live in such a family for love nor money. The fact is, less advanced and poorer village peasant societies have this kind of family - so we may again later this century when society collapses and the oil runs out...
By the way, there are very many old folk who DO live with their families in this country: not all families dump their old, but people can't cope so put them in home for the better and full-time care.
I get very annoyed with people from other cultures slagging of British culture. It's racism, actually. And envy.
Posted by Atheistboy | 02.08.08, 14:00 GMT
And I was replying to Mrs. Patterson's assertion that we live in a youth-obsessed culture. What happens when the tommy gets bigger and the hair start greying? No jobs and later no friends. Even your children avoid you. Please give me the chance to carry on dreaming of another world, where the whole family lives together, old and young. Perhaps it is all my imagination.
Posted by sharifL | 02.08.08, 13:41 GMT
Atheisboy: What can I say? One atheist to another? From Muslim to an atheist, I cannot preach much good about Muslims. What I meant was in Asia older people are not looked down, as in many places. Yes, I could go back and have a hell of time, with my Sterling. But where I come from , they make short process of those who join the infidels.
Your other points related to poverty in Asian countries. I cannot disagree with you on that point. Only your tone shows some arrogance.
Posted by sharifL | 02.08.08, 13:34 GMT
What about the big "religious" Kum Mela, which is an occasion for dumping old relatives.
Posted by gerry | 02.08.08, 11:31 GMT
Yes, but... a great numner of women are very well-off thank you, thanks to their husband's/ex-husband's money, inheritance and property wealth - and, occasionally, money they're earned themselves. Look at Cherie Blair - millionaire receiver of welfare state maternity pay and child benefit handouts.
Single breadwinners however, especially men, are constantly expected to work like hell for practically nothing, pay taxes so the well-off can get benefits and 'get crumbs off the young (wo)man's table'. And now, it will be legal to emply a 4th rate woman over a better man too (even if the woman is privileged and the man poorer and more talented): this has been policy for years in state organisations and the BBC. (One reason I'm self-employed). By the way, just scrap all benefits (maternity/child benefit) and pay pensioners more. Easy.
Personally, I am hoping for a nuclear war and/or mass famine and environmental disaster. There is NO point saving for old age at all.
Posted by Crumbs for the boys | 02.08.08, 10:54 GMT
17 Comments