Christina Patterson: Why the Chinese have reason to feel pride
Watching people in Tiananmen Square, I saw something I'd rarely seen in my life
Saturday, 3 May 2008
Last week in Tiananmen Square, I was moved to tears. It was not, I'm afraid, the thought of the thousand or so protesters massacred there 19 years ago that had me wiping away the tiny droplet of salt water unexpectedly trickling down my nose. It was the sight of thousands of people standing in silence to watch the lowering of their national flag.
I had expected tourists and tourist tat. Tourists there were, in abundance – groups of giggling teenagers, young couples, families on a day out and coach parties in red baseball caps, some waving little red flags. But if China's vast manufacturing industry extends to Tiananmen Square snowstorms or T- shirts, there was no sign of it here. You couldn't even get a postcard. You couldn't even get a bottle of water.
Instead, in this vast space, where Mao held rallies and where people come to do t'ai chi and fly kites, tourists, nearly all Chinese, took photos of each other, and of me, and lined up to watch skinny young soldiers with wasp waists march around a flagpole and take a flag away. Many were smiling. If they weren't on holiday, they were out for an evening stroll. And watching them, and watching them watch me, I saw something I'd rarely seen in my life – a relaxed expression of national pride.
The pride is evident from the moment you arrive at Beijing airport's new international terminal. Like Tiananmen Square, like the Forbidden City, like the Great Wall, and like China itself, it is gargantuan, a glittering symbol of the new China, teeming with elegantly uniformed staff, all eager to please. Even the immigration desk had a sign saying "You are welcome to comment on my performance" above a buzzer that you could press for the options, from smiley face to frown.
In Wangfujing Road, Beijing's Oxford Street, among the traditional tea shops and the pharmacies selling dried sea horses and knobbly roots, and the McDonald's and KFCs and Morgans, there are numerous shops bearing the proud slogan,"Beijing 2008 Official Licensed Product Centre" and, everywhere, the mantra "One World, One Dream". And in front of the vast Wangfujing Bookshop, boasting entire sections devoted to "application for job", "how to be an eloquent speaker" and "succeed psychology", as well, of course, as "Party history and party building", there are display boards with pictures of the Olympic torch, including carefully cropped photos of Konnie Huq and Gordon Brown.
On CNN in my hotel bedroom, I saw reports of the tortuous progress of the torch, from Kuala Lumpur to Jakarta, as closely guarded as residents of Guantanamo, but in the China Daily I got with my breakfast the headlines were "Torchbearer invited to visit again" and "Olympic flame burns bright in the rain". So when the main editorial declared that "the hysterical protests" of the "anti-China agitators" was unleashing a tidal wave of patriotism, I dismissed it as evil propaganda from a newspaper – like all newspapers in China – in hock to the party machine.
That, however, was before I went to Tiananmen Square, before I went to the galleries in Beijing's hip arts quarters, 798 and Caochangdi, and before I talked to some of Beijing's educated elite. "We're quite supportive of the government right now," said Sun Ning, director of Platform China, a gallery that opened last year. "We can see people starting to have a good life. When I was a child in the 1970s," she added, "to eat a banana was the most exciting thing I could imagine."
It's hard to imagine now. Today in China you can eat anything. You can buy Nike and Rolex and Chanel. (The Chanel concession at my hotel, when it opened, was the highest grossing in the world.) You can watch skylines spring out of paddy fields. You can watch a giant bird's nest grow before your eyes.
And you are damned if you're going to let countries whose economies are collapsing, countries whose poor people are getting poorer, countries that plundered and doped you in the past, and which are now gagging for your trade, spoil the party. "We tried Communism to equalise," says an email now circulating among Chinese worldwide. "You hated us for being Communists./ Now we embrace free trade and privatize,/ You berate us for being Mercantilist,/ HALT! You demanded: a billion-three who eat well will destroy the planet!/ So we tried birth control, then You blasted us for human rights abuse."
Since the 1990s, the Chinese government has lifted 350 million people out of poverty. It has overseen the mass metamorphosis of peasants into the world's biggest middle class. It has performed the world's biggest economic miracle. You can sort of see the reason for the pride.
Of course it's wrong to oppress the people of Tibet. Of course it's wrong to imprison people who speak out. Of course it's wrong to control the press (wrong in Italy, and wrong in China). And of course it's right to say so.
But sometimes if you want to wag your finger, you have to take it out of the pie.





Comments
38 Comments
The columnist says that "if China's vast manufacturing industry extends to Tiananmen Square snowstorms or T- shirts, there was no sign of it here. You couldn't even get a postcard. You couldn't even get a bottle of water."
Isn't this because they've been clearing out all the peddlers and street vendors in the area in preparation for the Olympics? (Not to mention countless migrant workers who've been ejected and the demolition of ancient hutong neighborhoods.) Because I seem to remember plenty of people giving the hard sell for hats, postcards and booklets last time.
Good job visiting sanitized Beijing!
Posted by QC | 07.05.08, 18:41 GMT
Ms. Paterson' article does reflect the true China. I lived in China for 26 years and have resided in the U.S. for 21 year. My brother in Beijing is a successful businessman, but my parents and sisters are retired factory workers. Actually, my sisters' retirement was also the result of the close of the state owned factories that employed them. My parents complained about the increasing costs for blood pressure control medicine. My sisters complained about the inflation. They complained like many ordinary American retirees do. But when I asked them "do you feel your life is much better than before (referring Mao's time), embarrassing smiles appeared in their faces: They all admitted "yes" and they are living happily in the fast developing contemporary China.
Posted by Wayne | 07.05.08, 11:12 GMT
Dear Sir:
As a Chinese, I want to thank you for Christina Pattersons column on 3rd May 2008 Why the Chinese have reason to feel pride. I am sure, many others would have the same thought as mine: --finally, there is someone in the western media could tell the truth of todays China and gave the descent reason for Chineses anger.
Most western media are too comfortable to understand those developing countries.
How many westerners know Chinese city people had to queue more than two hours just for the limited sold Tofu and protein food just twenty years ago?
People should read news presented by its witnesses and thinkers like Christina Patterson. Media must not be made in governors mouth, politician desks and those naive self- standard reporters!
Xinran -- author of The Good Women of China Sky Burial Miss Chopsticks
Posted by Xinran | 06.05.08, 11:37 GMT
One particular poster by the name AT made some remarks which sounds
funny. I quote, "It is obvious to any independently minded person that the
Chinese are practicing genocide against the Tibetan people.... ". Well, who is
there to tell who are independently minded and who are not?
Tell me which genocide in human history has allowed an entire population to
between triple and quadruple in fifty years' time? And what's the other
genocide which raised the life expectancy of an entire population from 30-ish
to 60-ish in fifty years' time? Or for that matter, how many democracies have
achieved similar feats?
After reading the first paragraph, I just don't think any reasonably minded
person can engage in a meaningful discussion with people like that. Next time,
at least try your best to fabricate something to start with.
-----------------
I don't think they even know the factual figure about Tibet or China.
what they know is that CCP had kill over 1 million tibetans while in fact the population of tibetans tripled; they said tibetans can't get any education while in fact 400,000 students study in tibet. they said Dailai Lama is the spiritual leader of Tibetan, while in fact he is just a Polictial Monk.
Posted by boybund | 04.05.08, 10:29 GMT
Thank you very much Christina. You told the world the other side of China. A more real China than what the world was told by CNN, BBC and the New York Times in the past two months.
I am 36 and lived in England for two years and have been to most of the western countries. It's true that China is still backward in many places, especially in the rurual areas. But I cannot forget that only 30 years ago, we didn't have electricity, we didn't have enough food and only on the new year's day, I could share one apple with my three sisters and one brother. And now, I have my own apartment, my family can eat everything, buy almost anything I like. That is not because I have any relations -- my parents were both farmers -- that's because I have had the chance enjoyed by all the ordinary people in the west.
I firmly believe that when the Chinese people have got the chance as you have, we can do as well as you are.
Now, the Chinese people have the chance.
Posted by mike wang | 04.05.08, 07:10 GMT
On the issue of Tibet I have lots of opinions - same too about the government - and the economy and democracy and the 'one world one dream' slogan (just what is that dream?) but irrespective of anything thought and said by anyone including myself - I compare 'society' in China to that back home and cannot imagine any other country in which I would rather live than China. Given the choice between China and the West why in God's name would I want to live in the West. Argue all you like - it means nothing. Come live here 'with' Chinese people and see for yourself an orderly peaceful and safe society. Their sins are the same as in the west - but for all their numbers - society is more relaxed, sociable, free of 'big brother' political activists and ultimately more preferable.
Posted by R.P.BenDedek | 04.05.08, 01:42 GMT
Christina, I too stand up beside you to be counted. If only there are more people like you with the courage to think independently of the masses frenzy with hatred, there would not be Hitler and Nazism. Democracy + mob prejudice + racism is just as lethal a mix as any other. By the way, why don't we hear from all those hypocrites yelling about China and Tibet talk about the people of Diego Garcia? The entire population of a tiny helpless nation being emptied so that the US can build a military base to attack other countries? What sheer hypocrisy!
Posted by John Smith | 03.05.08, 23:24 GMT
Christina, I too stand up beside you to be counted. If only there are more people like you with the courage to think independently of the masses frenzy with hatred, there would not be Hitler and Nazism. Democracy + mob prejudice + racism is just as lethal a mix as any other. By the way, why don't we hear from all those hypocrites yelling about China and Tibet talk about the people of Diego Garcia? The entire population of a tiny helpless nation being emptied so that the US can build a military base to attack other countries? What sheer hypocrisy!
Posted by John Smith | 03.05.08, 23:23 GMT
Congratulation to "The Independent" for publishing this refreshing article! In spite of the possibility that Ms Patterson may not have the complete picture of China (None of us does!), but she has the right sentiment. Being a Chinese living overseas, I am proud of China's rise. Together with the rise of India and other countries signifies the developing world is finally standing up. It is now up to the developed world to embrace and work together to solve all the challenging issues our global village faces. There are many encouraging signs! Keeping the status quo and insisting on the divide between "us" versus "them" do not lead to a solution. War and "national interest" can only bring waste, destruction, and catastrophe.
(See, for example, 2007 BBC Reith Lecture Series: http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/reith2007/lecture1.shtml)
Posted by zxs | 03.05.08, 23:21 GMT
One particular poster by the name AT made some remarks which sounds
funny. I quote, "It is obvious to any independently minded person that the
Chinese are practicing genocide against the Tibetan people.... ". Well, who is
there to tell who are independently minded and who are not?
Tell me which genocide in human history has allowed an entire population to
between triple and quadruple in fifty years' time? And what's the other
genocide which raised the life expectancy of an entire population from 30-ish
to 60-ish in fifty years' time? Or for that matter, how many democracies have
achieved similar feats?
After reading the first paragraph, I just don't think any reasonably minded
person can engage in a meaningful discussion with people like that. Next time,
at least try your best to fabricate something to start with.
Posted by Don Xie | 03.05.08, 22:16 GMT
38 Comments