Commentators

Partly Sunny with Showers 10° London Hi 11°C / Lo 7°C

Clifford Coonan: Tension over Chinese migrants mirrors Tibet riots

It was a telling phrase, whispered furtively by a frightened man looking over his shoulder. He was a Muslim Uighur in the restive western Chinese province of Xinjiang, where scores of people were killed in violence at the weekend directed at Han Chinese settlers. How would he describe the relationship between the Uighurs and the Chinese?

"There is no relationship," he said, resentment in his voice. A Muslim, his own language is of Turkic origin and he bears no resemblance to the Han Chinese, China's dominant ethnic group.

Later that day, the first question asked by a Han Chinese policeman checking me out was: "Do you feel safe here?" Even though they don't trust each other, even though they are dissimilar in appearance, culture, religion and politics, the fates of the Uighurs and the Chinese have been linked for hundreds of years by the Silk Road caravan routes through the region that sent Chinese silk to the Middle East and Europe.

In Urumqi on Sunday, the tension between the two spilled over. Scores were killed in China's deadliest unrest since the 1989 demonstrations in Tiananmen Square.

Such bloodshed seems out of place in Urumqi, a pleasant city thousands of miles from Beijing. To get there, you fly four hours from the capital over unrelenting desert; when you land, you are further from the sea than any other major city on Earth.

An influx of migrants means Urumqi is now dominated by Han Chinese. Almost half of Xinjiang's 20 million people are Uighurs, many of whom want independence for Xinjiang, a region rich in minerals and oil that borders eight Central Asian nations. They say the millions of Han Chinese who have settled here are gradually squeezing the Uighurs out.

They are unhappy with the growing economic and political power of Han Chinese and reject what they see as cultural imperialism from Beijing, much as Tibetan activists feel about what is happening there. The weekend's violence in Xinjiang echoes that seen in Lhasa and other Tibetan areas in March last year, when Han Chinese and Chinese-owned businesses were also targeted.

The relationship between Uighurs and Chinese is extremely complicated. Xinjiang is close to Pakistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan and visually has more in common with these countries. You do not feel like you are in China when you stand on the streets of Kashgar, although Urumqi looks more and more Chinese as migration transforms the city. Chinese in other parts of the country use racial stereotypes and talk of how Uighurs cannot be trusted, how they cut purses with sharp knives.

Beijing says separatist Uighurs are violent Islamist fundamentalists trying to cut the province off from Chinese rule. Rights groups and Uighur activists say Beijing exaggerates the threat posed to stability to justify its tough grip on the province, the largest in the country.

In the last 60 years, the Beijing government's role there has expanded. It is currently knocking down the ancient city of Kashgar, transforming its narrow traditional streets into tiled, modern structures that have horrified critics who see a culture under threat, and making an already difficult relationship harder still.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

it is ridiculous
[info]daniel_yap wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 02:03 am (UTC)
so many innocent people were killed in this riot while this report just lied.
A Parallel situation in the UK.
[info]gwilliamm wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 03:26 am (UTC)
The situation described in China is exactly the same as in parts of the UK and the government also gives preference to the immigrants and if you are an indigenous person who protests about preferential treatment given to the immigrants you are called a racist. In UK the politicians play on the docile character of the local people who are now unable to stand up for what they think is correct, they are afraid of being branded as something they are not.
Another similar part of this report is that the incomers do not look like the locals have a different religion that we are supposed to respect while they respect no part of our society they even insult our troops who are fighting to keep us safe.
I would like the Independent editorial team to have some balls and report on similar situations within the UK that are no go for local people.
Don't compare with Tibet
[info]miasaheb wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 06:10 am (UTC)
Tibetian are Buddhists.Unlike Muslims their proest was peaceful. At least they never attacked a single Chinese civilian. Uighurs are Muslims. Muslims do not beleive in peaceful protest and hence killed a large number of Chinese civilians. The grievence of Uighurs may be genuine. This may be a good lesson for China as they always helped the Islamic Pakistan to destabilise India.
Look over there!
[info]rhinocircus wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 06:52 am (UTC)
There has been a Right-wing, military coup in Honduras and people have been killed. A democratically elected President Zelaya has been deposed at gunpoint and his people are demonstrating to attract world attention.

The illegal government junta has been called the "interim government" does anyone spot the hypocrisy of western "democracies". "Look! Look over there--the East is red with blood!"
independent to East Turkestan
[info]evin125 wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 07:04 am (UTC)
China is the region's cultural invaders is an area out of China's central asia
Re: independent to East Turkestan
[info]jfkc wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 07:59 am (UTC)
China will not allow Xinjiang to become East Turkestan, whatever the cost. Unity of China is the one claim that the Chinese Communist Party prides itself above all else ever since they were humiliated in 1950 by Stalin to accept the formal independence of Mongolia and lost 15% of its land mass. No Chinese Communist Party Chairman or Chinese Premier can survive politically if they allow Xinjiang to slip away like Mongolia.
Large Scale Immigration
[info]moomintroll_1 wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 07:58 am (UTC)
This is a classic example of a major effect of large scale immigration, namely destabilisation and violence. We can already see the same thing starting to happen in parts of Britain, particularly where followers of the Religion of Peace are involved. Will the Independent continue to push the line that large scale immigration is a good thing?
Re: Large Scale Immigration
[info]jfkc wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 08:28 am (UTC)
The comparison may not be entirely appropriate because the Han Chinese and the Uighurs were living side by side for more than two thousand years. The land of the Chinese Xinjiang province was where the old silk road located and therefore there were strong presence of Han Chinese in cities along the routes. Exactly how many Han Chinese were in Xinjiang in the historical past were difficult to gauge but admittedly significant more migration added to that in the Communist era. If you have to make a comparison, it is more like English living in Scotland than new immigrants entering Britain in the modern era.
Riots and growing Nationalism
[info]londonrebel wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 10:08 am (UTC)
The ethnic hatred going on here has been long bubbling under the surface but we are seeing the confrontation between Uighur desires for self-respect and self-determination coming up now against an increasingly nationalistic Han majority. The deaths of large numbers of Han Chinese will resonate deeply within China, which is already well-atuned to notions of Han superiority and uniqueness - a position encouraged by government propaganda and the constant reminder of external threats. With Beijing stuck in an authoritarian mindset and the Uighurs incensed, the media vacuum covering these events (internet shutting down along with mobile phone systems in Urumqi and other parts of Xinjiang) means nasty and perhaps exaggerated rumours and hearsay about the killings will proliferate among hard facts to generate a heightened atmosphere of hatred and suspicion. Beijing needs to adopt an intelligent and inclusive approach to this or face a further meltdown of public order.
Re: Riots and growing Nationalism
[info]atticus1900 wrote:
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 at 11:18 am (UTC)
Correct in the analysis of Han Chinese believing they are superior. As a nation, they have been primed to be ultra-responsive to any threat to their national integrity, to the point where the CCP would be unable to avoid a war if the public demanded it, even if it wasn't in their interests.

Columnist Comments

dominic_lawson

Dominic Lawson: Roll up for the great emissions-fest

Do world leaders believe what they say about the imminence of disaster?

mary_dejevsky

Mary Dejevsky: World leadership is an outdated hope

The EU did not want a traffic-stopping standard-bearer

john_walsh

John Walsh: Born and bred a Brit...

...but apparently I know nothing about Britishness


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion