Dominic Lawson: How to squeeze the Russians
'Can we suggest, Prime Minister, that you announce a public inquest into the murder of Mr Litvinenko?'
Friday, 5 September 2008
I found the following memo – as you do – under a half-finished cup of coffee on the train to Waterloo. Coffee stains made it difficult to read, but it seemed to have come from a person with the single initial, C.
"Prime Minister, you asked us to come up with 'the cheapest possible way to nobble Putin, which will not involve speeches or public acts of any sort by that bastard Miliband'. While we were slightly surprised by this reference to the Secretary of State, we share your view that another of his speeches on the naughtiness of the Russians, and how the EU is really, really serious about it this time, will not do.
You will have observed from today's newspapers how a systematic campaign of financial and legal harassment has caused BP to blink in its battle with the Russian oligarchs. We propose a similar policy.
First of all, we should ask our friends in Switzerland to investigate the affairs of the Gunvor Group. You will recall from an earlier memo that Mr Putin has a very special interest in this company, which now takes commission on about a third of Russia's seaborne crude oil exports. We might not even need help from the Swiss for this, as our most recent investigations have revealed that Gunvor's ultimate holding company is domiciled in the British Virgin Islands.
In case you want to do something less obscure – an eye-catching initiative with which you could be personally associated, if you would pardon the expression – we suggest that you announce a formal investigation into Gazprom's intimations of a bid for Centrica. You will recall that our earlier guidance to Mr Medvedev (who was then chairman of Gazprom) was that we had no principled objections to the Russians taking control of more than half of our gas supply market. Perhaps you could tell him that in the current circumstances we are more likely to allow Mr Ahmedinejad to buy Centrica.
On the subject of Anglo-Russian business partnerships, we should adopt a much tougher vetting procedure for former servants of the Crown offered money to sell their services to Mr Putin's friends. It's not as if they don't have good public sector pensions (thanks, by the way). I am sorry to have to tell you that Sir Francis Richards, the former head of GCHQ, was recently allowed to join the advisory board of a telecoms company owned by Mikhail Fridman – one of the very oligarchs who have just created such havoc for BP's oil business in Russia. You can tell the current head of our secret communications centre that Sir Francis is the last GCHQ boss who will be allowed to work for Mr Fridman, or any other Russian billionaire
We are, as you know, sceptical about Germany's willingness to cause genuine discomfort to Mr Putin's regime. Nevertheless, Chancellor Merkel is much more open to such a course than her predecessor Gerhard Schröder: he is now the chairman of the Nord Stream gas pipeline project designed to pump Gazprom's products subsea directly to Germany, thus reducing Russia's dependence on Poland and Ukraine for transit. We are told that Chancellor Merkel would enjoy making Mr Schröder's life less pleasurable, and would welcome your support in supplying any regulatory or environmental reasons – even genuine ones – as to why the Nord Stream gas project should be blocked.
Now for the most sensitive matter of all – what our American friends call the 'short and curlies department'. Our colleagues in the Metropolitan Police have plenty of evidence that the FSB was involved in the murder of Alexander Litvinenko. As you know, this was the first time since the death of Georgi Markov that one of Her Majesty's subjects has been murdered in this country by a foreign intelligence service. You will also know that the Russian Government has refused even to consider extraditing the chief suspect to face trial in the UK.
We therefore suggest that a public inquest is held into the assassination of Mr Litvinenko. We were impressed with the way that Lord Justice Scott Baker conducted the recent inquest into the deaths of Diana Princess of Wales and Dodi Fayed. He could be most usefully reemployed: you will recall that he kept the Diana inquest going for many months, with the media given complete access to all documentation, and that we were asked to agree that even MI6 officers should be compelled to give evidence in public.
One of the chief witnesses would be Boris Berezovsky; this most voluble of Putin's enemies would need to spend several days in the witness box. As you know, a year ago we expelled a Russian whom we had reason to believe was planning to assassinate Mr Berezovsky. Our most recent information from Russia is that this man has now disappeared – an interesting fact which the inquest will also bring to public attention
The real beauty of this is that such an inquest will have to – as our lawyer friends might put it – go to motive. Mr Litvinenko persistently claimed that FSB agents, and not Chechen rebels, had been behind the bombing of Moscow apartment blocks in 1999, which was used to justify the attack on Chechnya, and which in turn was so helpful to Putin in his campaign to be elected Russian president. You will recall that the journalist Anna Politkovskaya was also murdered following her own investigations into the FSB's role in the Moscow apartment bombings.
Naturally the inquest will not be able to establish as a fact that Putin had Mr Litvinenko murdered; but his standing among his own people – which is what matters most to him – would be deeply damaged by a prolonged and legal public examination into the events behind the Moscow bombings.
Finally, Prime Minister, as per your request, this memo will not be copied to the Foreign Secretary."
You will have concluded, rightly, that this is an invention of a memo; but if something like it doesn't exist, I would be most surprised.
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited




Comments
55 Comments
Dear me Dominic/ Did you get paid for writing that Report? I am sure
Putin must b laughin. Some posts have mentioned little Boris Berezovsky. This littleman was accused of Terrorism against the Russian state by Putin. The London Met. Okd the Docs
from Moscow Poliz . Extradition Docs were processed for Sept. 2003. Blunkett was Home Secretary. Before Extradition was given at Bow Str. Maj. Court,London somebody granted Boris Assylum.Perhaps Dominic in your invented Memo you could find out who granted the Assylum. I doubt it was Blunkett. He was blind with love for his American Amour at that time. and
and to leave her was was not on. So was Berezovskys Assylum done legally. If it wasnt the Met could arrest the little man and blame him for the Polonium Poisin.After all the Met found Polonium in Boris,s office. I am sure Boris would get a Bear Hug from Putin.
And Dom. You might get a' Pull the other one' book prize!
Posted by Jim | 06.09.08, 23:38 GMT
Yet another evidence of "FREE" press in republicans USA - 911 comparison with Georgian Crisis gets censored on CBC Broadcast LIVE check out YouTube -
www(.)youtube(.)com/watch?v=WtdVS8646GI
IS THIS A FREE PRESS???
Biased press especially TV dont understand their huge responsibility and promote and provoke a WAR.
Shame on those neoconcentrated disgraceful correspondents, TV-presentors creating a population not used to think by themselves.
Posted by tROpix | 06.09.08, 22:36 GMT
Domnic Lawson is naive to imagine that a "show inquest" on the murder of Litvenenko would be taken seriously by the Russian public (even the well-informed minority), or that MI5 and MI6 would seriously "come clean" with what they know (or don't know) about the business. Moreover, to allow Berezovsky ample time to rant in a coroner's court would more likely raise doubts as to why Britain granted this sleazy megalomaniac political asylum in the UK than to put Putin the dock of public opinion...
However, it would be entertaining, like Mohammed Al-Fayed on steroids at the Diana inquest..
Posted by Gospodi | 06.09.08, 20:06 GMT
It's comforting to know that 'old' EU members are beginning to have second thoughts about supporting America's provocative and confrontational approach to Russia. The only problem remaining is the group of bellicose 'new' members, including Poland and the Baltic states. Of course, the UK, the semi-detached EU member, being America's European mouthpiece, is a hopeless cause (at the moment). It's going to be interesting to see what the EU fact finding mission to Georgia discovers.
Posted by Tina Basha | 06.09.08, 17:05 GMT
Is Russophobe a kind of racism?
A disease or crime?
Posted by tROpix | 06.09.08, 10:04 GMT
The georgians started it. They're pawns of the west. to have them and the Ukraine as part of NATO would be pure folly. The American neocons are winding the Russkies up. And i wonder what Mr lawsons hidden agenda is? Whose gang is this Jewish son of a former Tory chancellor a part of? (Just thought i'd ask.) Post this and I'll be damned!
Posted by Count Viktor Tostov | 06.09.08, 09:50 GMT
it was the uzbekistan brown islamic natives that rob me in the broad dayllight at their sinister taskent airport, and not russians natives. and now those ignoramus wans us to believe that those islamic chechan natives did no wrong?
Posted by WLil | 06.09.08, 09:07 GMT
Keep in mind that in their minds Western politicians at least suspect, if not KNOW that they are on the wrong side of the fence on this conflict, although they would never admit it. So, they don't want to push too far, and ruin their political careers forever. EU is calling for investigation too see who is responsible for the conflict. The findings have potential to distroy any politician who pushes too far on this issue. Bush and Chaney don't care, they only have a few months left in office. I wonder if EU conducts their investigation and issues its findings before election in US. That could carry, if not major, some weight in US elections.
Posted by FromUSAwithLove | 06.09.08, 08:45 GMT
If only,
but can you see Brown ever showing any coherent forceful action to show Putin and his thugs that one European Country was willing to make relations difficult as a result of the Georgian Invasion?
Posted by rikkyC | 06.09.08, 08:28 GMT
Privatly owned Western media works for ratings and when Russian tanks are rolling Western meida is making major dollars, regardless of the cause. Great majority of people clicking through news channels or picking up a newspaper will go after the most dramatic healines. Now ask yourself if you were at a newsstand and looking at two newspapers, and on one the front page one paper would say "Georgia attacks its small separatist region, Russia responds", and another says "Big Bad Russian Bear Attacks it's small neighbour", which paper would you choose? Be honest.
As far as politicians are concerned, they supported Saakashvili, spent tax-payers money on building up Georgia and it's military, and they have to answer to their congress or parlament for that. They simply cannot afford to admit the mistake that they made by supporting the Saakashvilli regime, as it will mean political suicide for them. All is left to do is to blame Russia. Hopefully people will see through it.
Posted by FromUSAwithLove | 06.09.08, 08:21 GMT
55 Comments