Esther Walker: It's too cruel to deny a girl her fake tan
Thursday, 24 July 2008
What an unspeakable meanie. Carol Robinson, the acting headteacher of the Baines School in Lancashire, has written to all parents ahead of the new term, asking them not to send their daughters to school wearing too much "false tan" so that they are "varying shades of orange". The school, she goes on, wants to promote "natural beauty and contentment with one's own looks".
What. Ever.
Decent fake tan – note please, Miss, that the correct term is fake tan, not false tan – is one of the greatest inventions of the 21st century. To deny people the right to smother themselves in it, however inexpertly (how else are you to learn, after all?) is just unkind.
More than once, I have lamented the fact that neither fake tan nor that other modern miracle, hair straighteners, existed when I was at school; had they, my own ghastly teen years would have been improved beyond recognition. Being a redhead, I cannot go brown – well, not easily, anyway. As Billy Connolly once said: "It takes me three weeks of tanning just to get white."
But you don't need to be a redhead not to go brown. There are fair-skinned people of all hair colours who, no matter how doggedly they lie prostrate in the garden on a sunny day, will stay mushroom-white, if they don't go raw pink. This is bad enough when you are a grown-up, going about your business in a grown-up fashion, with sensible, adult opinions about vanity and self-worth.
I wager that a bottle of Johnson's Holiday Skin lotion can be found in the bathroom cabinets of serious, high-minded lawyers and academics up and down the country. Just look at Nancy Dell'Olio. She's a lawyer and that colour can't be real. Or what about Emily Maitlis? A Cambridge degree, fluent in four languages and a Newsnight presenter and bright orange, at all times, in all weathers.
So just imagine how bad it is when you are a teenager. The argument that the Baines School girls ought to love the way they are naturally is not only unbelievably babyish, it misunderstands teenagers so grossly that it is a wonder that this Ms Robinson woman is allowed to teach.
Between the ages of 12 and 19, you have no sense of yourself or of what you are worth. No clue who you are, or what you should be. Other girls at school go an effortless nut-brown during the summer, depart in July to spend six weeks in the Devon sunshine, and then come back looking like someone out of an advert for Australia. On TV, all you see are thin, brown, fashionable girls. And their characteristic most easy to imitate is their tan – by getting it out of a bottle.
Obviously, schoolgirls are going to get straight down to Boots and buy the cheapest skin dye available. Obviously, they are going to spend years turning themselves a variety of hideous colours and stinking of digestive biscuits, in just the same way that they will spend years straightening their hair and fussing over the exact length of their skirt.
There are those, of course, who can go brown in the sunshine and on sunbeds but choose, instead, to use fake tan. With all the scientific evidence that shows that lying in the sun first wrinkles you up like a prune and then kills you, that anyone should choose to fake it over basting themselves in UV rays ought to be celebrated and encouraged, pointed out in assembly as exemplary, health-conscious students and rewarded with a Topshop voucher.
Just because girls wish to spend their school years making themselves look as different from their natural state as possible – be it with fake tan, hair dye, jewellery or make-up – it doesn't mean they're suffering from body dysmorphia or are unnaturally insecure. It just means that they are normal teenagers who hate themselves with a passion but who will grow out of it. And the complaint that they overdo it and come to school with streaky legs is staggeringly unforgiving. What modern woman hasn't, from time to time, made the mistake of slopping the stuff on too quickly, too heavily, too near finger and toe-nails, turning her cuticles brown for a week?
If Ms Robinson, or anyone else, really wants schoolgirls to love themselves, they could take them aside and give them a few pointers on good fake tan application. Unless you're going to do that, give them a damned break.
Of course, there is more at work here than Ms Robinson genuinely thinking that, on its own aesthetic terms, fake tan doesn't look nice, or altruistically wanting her girls to love themselves just as they are. To object to fake tan is snobbery, it is to sneer at the people who use it most: footballers' wives; Kerry Katona; Britney Spears; and Jordan. If Princess Anne and Tessa Jowell were serial fake tan abusers, would Ms Robinson think it such a bad thing?

Comments
20 Comments
And another thing, Mrs Robinson wrote on the letters that were sent home to parents, "the current trend of fake/spray tans does nothing to enhance the appearance of our young ladies", NO WHERE was the word "false" mentioned.
So please, before posting your ill-worded garbage
GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT.
Posted by :) | 25.07.08, 23:00 GMT
The stupidity of people that are following this story amazes me.
The headteacher of Baines School has NOT completely banned fake tan, she just doesn't want students going over the top and coming to school looking like a tangerine. So to be honest, that has pretty much cancelled out Esther Walker's entire argument.
Fine, some students have fair skin so do not tan, but going over the top with fake tan and turning themselves orange does not make them look anything like their fellow naturally tanned students, so another argument cancelled out.
I attend the school and the colour of some of the students is ridiculous. I agree completely with what Mrs. Robinson has done, if students do not like it then they can go elsewhere. It makes the school look trashy and I think she has the right to dictate what students wear because at the end of the day they are representing the school.
Posted by :) | 25.07.08, 22:54 GMT
Well said, Billy. Teenagers do all manner of odd things, not only girls, but boys too. Their fashions can be a hoot but what harm are they doing? Teddy Boys, Mods, Rockers the list goes on. My uncle was Teddy Boy but he's now a sober, booted and suited sixty year old, no lasting damage.
To the poster who said that people who enhance themselves are vacuous. No, they really aren't. Get out more and try to meet people, it might make you less narrow minded and judgemental.
I agree with the poster who mentioned the puritans. They are certainly out and about. Miserable killjoys.
Posted by former teenage rebel | 25.07.08, 11:07 GMT
Yes teenagers look daft, there are a hundred different things teenagers do to make themselves look special and assert themselves.
I think that by letting them mess about as teens helps them get over the fascination at a young age and move on to more important things as adults. It is often when you are restricted in youth that you go on to like these things all too much as adults.
Really it's just a teenage form of playing 'dressing up' in anticipation of adult life - an important part of their development.
To the men who have been commenting about how unattractive it is: why are you concerned about how much a 14 year old attracts you?
Posted by Billy | 25.07.08, 09:32 GMT
The fake tan is just another way for kids/people to feel better about themselves and there is nothing wrong in that. We celebrate youth and beauty above all else in our culture. Why then are we shocked when the generation that is coming up is vacuous, self centered and worship at the shrine of faux celebrity? It's fame for fames sake and we created that. A big slap on the back for a devolving human race.
Posted by Englishman in New York | 25.07.08, 00:35 GMT
"Just because girls wish to spend their school years making themselves look as different from their natural state as possible be it with fake tan, hair dye, jewellery or make-up it doesn't mean they're suffering from body dysmorphia or are unnaturally insecure. It just means that they are normal teenagers who hate themselves with a passion but who will grow out of it."
So in other words, it's OK to encourage the next generation of teenagers to be exactly as low on self-esteem, as dependent on artificial enhancements to make them happy and at peace with their own selves, as any generation before them? There is such a thing as progress, and if it's in the direction of teenagers being less insecure, it's an overwhelmingly good thing.
Posted by Kiro | 24.07.08, 23:46 GMT
Claudia Winkleman? Esther Walker? Why is the editor of The Independent employing writers better suited to Red Top newspapers?
Posted by Arabella | 24.07.08, 22:32 GMT
Amazing that with all her important duties and responsibilities, a school headmistress would be concerned with fake tans.
Sounds as if the issue is more about control then about appearances.
Posted by Billy from Brooklyn | 24.07.08, 18:58 GMT
Sorry Emily just because it has been done in the past does not mean it is right or makes sense, otherwise we would still be sending little bos up chimneys and watching bear baiting!
The Headteach is right and should be doing the same for make up and jewellery.
Anybody who wishes to "embellish" their body is terribly sad and vaccuous, witness alll those people who dress up to the nines just to be seen at places like Royal Ascot.
Whilst this seems like a minor issue it is just another brick in the wall of the things that are wrong with our society today.
Posted by Peter F | 24.07.08, 17:28 GMT
Sack cloth and ashes, I think.
Posted by Mez | 24.07.08, 17:07 GMT
20 Comments