Gary McKeone: The creepy cult of management consultancy
Personal development, psychometric testing – I'm a veteran
Tuesday, 6 May 2008
"I will listen and I will lead." The Prime Minister's words might easily have come from one of those management consultancy workshops where the glib sound-bite rules, the high-sounding but empty phrase that bleeds language of any real meaning –or, indeed, from Follow the Money: The Audit Commission, public money and the management of public services 2003-2008, a new book by Duncan Campbell-Smith.
According to one review of the book, the Commission's record is one of rampant growth and excess, whether budgetary (£15m in 1984 to £220m in 2004, staffing (524 in 1984 to 2,356 in 2004) or practice (500 public sector targets in 1999 to 2,500 targets for local government and transport alone in 2000). Management consultancy features prominently, a territory that has flourished during the tenure of the Labour government.
Perhaps somewhere there exists a self-help group, a Priory-style clinic for those of us who have suffered at the hands of management consultants, a sanctuary where we can gather privately to relive and so exorcise those jargon-filled days, that enforced camaraderie of the cynical and the committed.
I worked for a public-sector quango, Arts Council England, that succumbed to the management consultancy bug. Change management, personal development, leadership training, psychometric testing – I'm a veteran.
It always begins with a restructure, first refuge of the visionless. Forget the view, let's tinker with the window. Next thing you're in a room somewhere learning how to make people redundant; remember your body language; have tissues ready; deliver a clear message; keep a revolver handy (I made that up). Some sad actor is hired to put you through role play, by turns aggressive, pleading, wailing, enacting every imaginable response to the redundancy word so that when you get back to the office to give your colleagues the heave-ho, think of it as a performance, a technique, nothing to do with real life.
Or take the leadership training course, there to make us all masters of the public sector universe. We're gathered in a field at 8.30 one morning, with bamboo canes, a rubber band, a pencil, some string and a hard-boiled egg. Our mission – to construct a device that will propel said egg as far as possible across the field. Genius. From just such challenges are leaders forged. In the distance cud-chewing cows stare across a hedge at us. They're laughing.
The jargon is, of course, endemic; the elephant in the room, to helicopter (apparently something to do with seeing the bigger picture) and the endless diagrams, all circles and arrows, the little yellow post-its we stick on the wall with our individual, life-changing "promise" indicating how we will be better managers: "I will talk more strategically to my staff", "I will value the opinions of others", "I will trust others to trust me to trust them", "I will throw myself out of a helicopter", "I want to be a cow".
Enforced light relief only increases the horror. This usually happens on the last night, when a glimmer of escape fuels the frivolity. At breakfast we're given the instruction in that "let's-all-have-some-fun-in-a-strategic-kind-of-way" voice. We're going to form teams, rehearse a performance piece based on what we've learned on our course and, after supper, we'll perform the pieces for each other in the Rest & Reflect Room. Dear God.
Think of a never-ending nursery-school play minus the innocence. Here come five senior managers pretending to be helicopters, blades whirring, all chug-chug noises and formation flying, eyes ablaze with earnestness; they've gone over to the other side leaving behind any semblance of the real world; they are now leaders, their faces shining with the ardour of the convert. Their piece is a dramatisation of a policy document called "Diversity and Inclusion: A Paradigm for Progress." All irony is suspended.
We applaud vigorously; we cheer; we have to. The only way through this agony is to subscribe to the illusion. We're all in this together. I won't tell if you won't. Sure wasn't it fun? Damn the expense, we're worth it.
No sooner are we back in our real-world offices than we're summoned to another room, windowless (always a bad sign), to be told that the impending change is good news (a very bad sign). There will be difficult decisions (redundancies) but we are empowered to make them (payback time for all that fresh country air and egg-throwing). Besides, always remember that "less is more". Just as fatter is thinner, colder is warmer, shorter is taller, and pitter is patter.
Alas, after all that expensive training, I didn't survive the cull (strategic diminution of core costs). But at least I knew how to handle the news.
Gary McKeone was literature director at Arts Council England
Post a comment
Limit: 1000 characters
View all comments that have been posted about this article
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by Independent.co.uk's Terms of Use
Also in this section
- Bruce Anderson: The world is in an alarming state of flux – and there is a limit to what Britain can do about it
- Yasmin Alibhai-Brown: Eat only local produce? I don't like the smell of that
- Andreas Whittam Smith: Life in the long shadow of the First World War
- Johann Hari: Cameron a progressive? I don't think so
- Philip Hensher: The answer lies in the length of men's shorts

You yourself seem to be taking a "helicopter" view and from your distance astrology and astronomy would look the same, as would alchemy and chemistry. If you're not prepared to look closely enough to tell the difference, then you deserve all you get.
There are plenty of consultants who can help organisations reach their goals, but it's a rare one who can help someone who doesn't know what they want to achieve. As the saying goes, if you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there.
Posted by Mick James | 09.05.08, 22:00 GMT
Let's not throw the baby out with the bath water here. The trouble with management consultancy is as much to do with its application and over-application, as it is about the quality of the consultants per-se. Something that has not been as well heeded in the public sector as it has in the private sector. My view on a more balanced perspective can be seen on the following: http://agents2change.typepad.com/blog4/2008/05/the-trouble-wit.html.
Thanks for the article Gary, its good to have a challenging perspective to consider.
Posted by Mary McGuire | 08.05.08, 18:32 GMT
I will print your fine column- and post a link to it on my blog. You see, I am a consultant, and I hate many of the things you mention. And I try to keep them out of my own practice. (I could take exception to some of your pet peeves, but what's the point?) You make sense. And those of us who chose consulting as a profession need to realize that our "brilliance/arrogance" isn't always seen as the same light as we intended. Thanks.
Rick Maurer
www.changemanagementnews.com (blog)
Posted by Rick Maurer | 08.05.08, 01:25 GMT
This is the best written article I have read for a long time.
Is there a way out of this horror for us I wonder, to a new aspiration towards truth, simplicity and succinctness?
Posted by Alf Tupper | 07.05.08, 18:22 GMT
Hayes is correct in saying that the sort of management consultancy described by Mr Mckeone is a con devised by otherwise unemployable graduates of second rate psychology schools. But he neglects to mention that their con would not work if the otherwise unemployable graduates of second rate business schools stopped hiring the buggers.
Unable to actually sit and think through the complex processes needed to improve an enterprise, these numpties hire other numpties (and one often suspects there not is a family connection somewhere) to dazzle the staff and the shareholders in equal measure.
The staff worked out long ago that these exercises were a circus, which, at best, need to be endured until they faded away. At worst they herald yet more useless bureaucracy (I've been fortunate enough to never go through redundancy). Sadly the shareholders haven't yet cottoned on to the scam. When they do I suspect the idiot execs will be the ones collecting their P45s and staff moral will soar.
Posted by The Remittance Man | 06.05.08, 16:44 GMT
Gary, The terrible stuff you experienced is little questioned by "mainstream" psychology departments in the English-speaking world. How do I know? - I am a Professor of Psychology who has worked in major universities in the EU, America, and Australasia. Management consultancy with the apparent backing of psychological science is, as you have surmised, little more than garbage; pernicious garbage, though, with quite sinister overtones and ultimately an authoritarian an dehumanised agenda. It may come as a surprise to you that there is no evidence that the practices you experienced have validity. Furthermore, most of it has simply been made up. However, the 2nd rate minds that constitute much of the academy and the largely ignorant men and women that graduate with psychology degrees (and that they are such is an is more of an indictment of the academy than of them) see this as no impediment. This geeky psychobabble with its superficial references to science is so welcomed by corporations not because of a misunderstanding about its validity, but because it is so nicely tailored to suit their self-serving requirements, applying fluff to what should be serious and gut-wrenching decisions and giving license to the idea that "human resources" may be treated as any other.
Posted by hayes | 06.05.08, 07:52 GMT