Guy Adams: LA needs its pot smokers
Los Angeles Notebook: How Hollywood hits may go up in smoke
Thursday, 7 August 2008
It's Wednesday night at the Sunset Marquis, a Hollywood hotel where Springsteen, Jagger, Rod Stewart, Aerosmith and most other self-respecting rockers stay when they're in town. We're sitting by the pool waiting for Stevie Wonder to perform and wondering exactly how many TV sets have, over the years, crash-landed in our immediate vicinity. LA being LA, no one's actually swimming.
My friend, who works in the music business and got us invites to this bash, opens his wallet to reveal a card containing his name, address, and the signature of a doctor. It cost about $100, he says, and for the past decade has helped him purchase and consume marijuana throughout California. Soon, however, it may become worthless. A jury at the US District Court in LA is currently hearing the case of Charles Lynch, the owner of a shop in Morro Bay called Central Coast Compassionate Caregivers.
Mr Lynch is on trial because his store sells just one product: cannabis. If found guilty, he could get five years. The case revolves around a single point. Under Proposition 215, a California state law which, in 1996, legalised weed for "medicinal purposes," Mr Lynch claims to have been operating legally.
The cops see things differently: they say marijuana is still banned under federal law, which is superior to state law, thereby making the defendant a common drug dealer. As ever in a test case, the trial's implications will be felt beyond the courtroom.
Should Lynch be found guilty, it will spell disaster for laid-back Angelenos and the mini-industry of doctors who are paid to perscribe them marijuana for spurious reasons such as "anxiety." Other pot retailers, in places such as Venice, will be forced out of business.
It will also be a spanner in the works of Hollywood, which is about to enjoy a revival of the "stoner movie." Pot is constantly smoked on the TV shows Entourage and Weeds, and with a bong-puffing Ben Kingsley just a hit in The Wackness, the soft drug is firmly back in vogue.
Today, Seth Rogen's marijuana comedy Pineapple Express hits cinemas; soon, Rhys Ifans will star in a biopic of Howard Marks. So while Charles Lynch stands in the dock, most of Hollywood is secretly praying that he's acquitted. This town needs its pot smokers, because the film industry's next big trend depends on it.
Legal beverage
Bourgeois crisis of the week: Santa Monica's chattering classes have lost a favourite hang-out, after Starbucks decided to close 600 US branches. The chain blames global economic turmoil, but perhaps it should learn from competitors and diversify: my local café recently went into partnership with one of LA's ubiquitous law firms. The sign outside offers: "coffee and a counsel."
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited

As far as I know, Charles Lynch faces a minimum of 5 years on all 5 charges meaning he could face 25-100 years in Federal prison for cannabis-only offenses.
Posted by Herbalicious | 08.08.08, 01:18 GMT
1. Lynch was already found guilty by the time you got this article out. It was an open and shut case since the federal court suppressed any mention of "medical Cannabis" and told the jury to disregard the testimony of the teenage bone cancer patient.
2. This is the second or third such dispensary proprietor to be found guilty in US federal court this year. One in May was sentenced to 20 years for running a "continuing criminal enterprise."
3. Aside from this, you U.K. people need to quit calling Cannabis "skunk." I know in the U.S. we use a racist term like "marijuana," but "skunk?" The "skunk" strain was bred thirty years ago, get up to date. There is no "new form of Cannabis called skunk." Skunk also makes Cannabis sound so sinister, like Cannabis is going to come poking around your trash can and get into a fight with your dog.
Posted by SomeGuy | 07.08.08, 22:13 GMT
Yep Amerika all over. One wonders why dope is banned. In the '30s because white and afro-negro jazz muso's and the clientelle mixed! outrage. shades of nazi germany. dope the great unifyer. therefore `verboten'. pure racial ideology. but the insanity inherent in semetic-monotheism is enshrined and cannot be dumped for the psychotic pathological disaster it is. After all having a dead person inside of you [Christ] isn't healthy-but it's enshrined in law. Result? Personality disorder! Enshrined. But one's own private fantasy? Illegal, loose your job, your home, your life. And when stressed? can't even have a cigarette. Amerika's moronic example is of course copied by my moronic country as well. It's all about control folks, they control and we must suffer their myopia.
Posted by Lutz Barz | 07.08.08, 15:31 GMT
Lynch's conviction will make no difference at all to medical marijuana patients. Since the beginning of the program twelve years ago, the feds have been busting dispensaries. It's like spitting in the ocean. It's estimated that there are as many as 200,000 Californians with medical marijuana recommendations. If one dispensary is closed down, they'll go to another.
There's nothing unique or precedent setting about the Lynch case. It's just one of many federal incursions into the lives of California's citizens.
Posted by Marc | 07.08.08, 01:18 GMT
The fact that this is a "problem" within certain circles of Los Angeles is disconcerning to say the least. What does it say about people's characters? What does it say about how in (or in this case out) of touch the people in power actually are with the inhabitants of LA. When it's a money-spinner like a movie for example, it's perfectly fine to convey light-hearted story lines about lovable, down to earth people who smoke weed. However when it actually comes to making real decisions about something as harmless as allowing cannabis for medicinal use in the area there's always a minority going to be up in arms about it no matter what. It's just a shame the government don't have any realism or sense when it comes to this subject.
Posted by Andrew Potts | 07.08.08, 01:05 GMT