Commentators

9° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

Guy Adams: The 'Jewishest' lawsuit ever – it would have been a treat

it was billed by local tabloids as the "Jewishest" lawsuit New York has ever seen, pitting two of the city's foremost egos in a $10m battle that promised to deliver several weeks of revelations about sleaze, greed and sexual peccadilloes.

Instead, a scandal-hungry crowd gathering at the Federal District Court in lower Manhattan yesterday let out a collective sigh of disappointment, after it emerged that sanity had at last prevailed between the Oscar-winning director and the billionaire bad boy of the US rag trade.

The public will therefore be denied the prospect of watching the bombastic Dov Charney argue that Woody Allen has no reputation to protect, because of his famously tumultuous love life.

At one point, the fashion impresario had threatened to force Allen's wife, Soon-Yi, to testify about their relationship, and demanded financial records to establish whether his bitter custody battle with ex-girlfriend Mia Farrow had affected his earning potential.

The tactics might seem cheap, but they were true to form for Charney, a swarthy street-hustler of a business magnate who founded American Apparel in the early 1990s, and turned it into one of the nation's most successful high-street brands.

Charney is an unconventional figure, famed for chairing business meetings in his underwear, who admits to having a voracious sexual appetite. In common with Allen, his love life has been bothersome. A string of female employees have sued him for harassment, one declaring that the work environment in his office "makes Animal House look like choir practice".

American Apparel, which makes colourful, basic T-shirts and underwear, has nonetheless carved out a hugely successful niche making, selling and promoting "sweatshop-free" clothing. Because the firm is "vertically integrated" – it does its design, production and advertising "in-house" – it can bring products to market quickly and more cheaply than rivals.

The irony is that this vertical integration spawned the billboard which featured Allen, a man whose personal style revolves around thick spectacles, drab knitwear and tweed jackets.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Feldman Tyro
[info]feldmantyrol wrote:
Tuesday, 19 May 2009 at 04:09 am (UTC)
If Woody Allen can't take a joke from Dov Charney, like THE New York company of the decade, then all is lost in my opinion. You can't walk 5 blocks in NYC without seeing an American Apparel. Woody should have known that this case was going to be a tar baby. Glad to see it was resolved amicably though.

Columnist Comments

hamish_mcrae

Hamish McRae: A time for giving with a difference

With the recession, there is a shift from giving people things to giving them services

mark_steel

Mark Steel: Come rain or revo- lution, it's money they want

Haven't the 20th anniversary celebrations of the overthrow of communism been miserable?

terence_blacker

Terence Blacker: Science must never be political or emotional

Politicians and action groups select favourable data, ignoring inconvenient evidence


Loading...


Most popular in Opinion