Ian Gibson: Disappointed? I am angry! Let's show some conviction
Saturday, 3 May 2008
Whilst it was a sunny Friday morning in Norwich and after a hectic night at the local elections and a day canvassing and knocking on doors, I find I am somewhat angry.
We lost good councillors, potential councillors and for the next few weeks we will hear nothing else but analysis by past ministers, MPs, think-tanks, and political editors of the "Bad Night for Labour".
For some time now the word "disappointed" has been bandied around in Labour circles. It reached its zenith in the last few weeks with the removal of the 10p income tax band and its effects on people of all ages. The full extent of the Government's policy has yet to be quantified or qualified. Its effect on the poorer members of our society has been devastating and although Labour has admitted this and moved to rectify it, opposition parties exploited it. Unless there is repositioning of the Government in the next six months, in relation to the rich and poor in society, then it is hard to believe more quiescent Labour MPs will take it on the chin quietly.
It's not the vulnerability of their seats but the belief we have achieved so many apparently "hidden" successes unknown to the public (and members?). The Labour ideal is about improving people's lot, and we have done that by stealth, but on the big issues we have failed to engage with the public. Leaden, boring, dispatch box deliveries beautifully read but with no passion, or belief (I think of recent debate on the Energy Bill) is no substitute for a lively performance steeped in conviction. If MPs are bored, how about the public?
So what can be done to reignite Labour Party members and avoid self-combustion? We need to be talking of positive policies which improve people's lives and will show Labour at its best. We have been in power for 10 years and it's time to take stock. We must look at which policies have worked and which have not; we must look at what the public wants. We must move on from Blairite policies on ID cards, Trident missiles and futile wars with astronomical costs. The need for affordable housing and a national council house building programme remains. We must be seen to be "moving forward" on issues like carbon neutral housing, flooding, cliff erosion and seabed change. These are problems we encounter with constituents week in and week out.
Another way to help the less well off is an examination of how to take them out of taxation altogether. I hope this is under way in time for the next pre-Budget report. We can, at the same time, support agency workers' rights, the need for a publicly owned railway system and quality care for the elderly. Delivering equal health facilities and treatments would be welcome, as would the immediate restoration of the link between pensions and average wage now.
But with significant change we will re-establish the dialogue with our public which "Big Listen" and other fatuous campaigns have failed to deliver. So a new dawn, a more focused approach showing what we stand for and how we will deliver. A Britain where new ideas are tried out in relation to public demand is now essential.
I believe Gordon Brown can lead the Labour Party into a new phase. I believe there are many in Government who wish to see a Britain more at ease with itself incorporating all the groups and with different beliefs and values. It can be done with strong leadership which gains its strengths from understanding of the people; "without vision the people perish". There are still Labour activists who think that being "nice" to the other parties is all that is needed. Members are losing their hard edge.
Ian Gibson is the Labour MP for Norwich North

"Disappointed? I am angry! Lets show some conviction" was very enlightening on many levels. He says he is angry and wants more conviction shown, showing us discontent in the New Labours ranks. Rather depressingly and predictably he gives himself away as just like the rest of them in their Westminster bunkers. When he lists ridiculous things they must move forward on such as carbon neutral housing, flooding, cliff erosion and seabed change. This highlights his total detachment from reality, people are worried about CRIME, EDUCATION, IMMIGRATION, REFUSE COLLECTION, STEALTH TAXS along with countless other real life concerns. A word of advice from a non tree hugger, people like me are "Disappointed? I am angry! Lets show some conviction" but on the difficult issues and on the issues that after 10 years in power you surly now must accept you are partly responsible for?
Posted by geoff | 05.05.08, 09:42 GMT
Dr Gibson has a fine reputation as a constituency MP and also has a reputation for voting according to his political convictions. If he was standing as an independent/Green/Lib-Dem, I would vote for him but I will never vote for the Labour party again. Even penury under the Tories is better than a police state.
The persons who are turning this country into a surveillance state are the same persons who will allow no scrutiny of their own activities, a recipe for fascism if ever there was one. The Inquiries act 2005 is one of many disgraceful pieces of legislation, it should be repealed immediately and proper public inquiries into the Iraq war and the 7/7 bombings must be held.
Labour's record on the environment is also poor, its funny how there is always plenty of money for missiles, identity cards, surveillance cameras and DNA testing of schoolkids but very little for renewable energy projects. The world is facing an energy crisis, we need serious action, now!
Posted by Mark | 03.05.08, 22:12 GMT
"We have been in power for 10 years and it's time to take stock."
It's time to take stock of the fact that your party was so concerned about not letting the Tories back in that you adopted all their policies, and couldn't even be honest and admit it. You never even tried to use the goodwill of May '97 to create a social democratic Government. It's too late to start talking about public ownership or redistribution now. You've handed the next election to the Tories on a plate. Well done.
And once you're out, people will not vote for you again in a hurry. Why would they vote for a Tory party by stealth instead of the Tories themselves?
If there's one single reason why we need PR at Westminster, it's so that when Labour screws up, we don't get Tories by default. (Oh yes, you opposed PR too.) Maybe our only hope for breaking up this two-party system is a hung Parliament with more Lib Dems. Oh, and Adrian Ramsay as Green MP in Norwich South. Now THAT would be good!
Posted by Peter | 03.05.08, 18:49 GMT
"We must be seen to be "moving forward" on issues like carbon neutral housing, flooding, cliff erosion and seabed change. These are problems we encounter with constituents week in and week out."
Just tell me with a straight face when a constituent last expressed his problem with seabed change. If you really think that that is on the mind of Doris Smith at number 53 then you lot will be out of power for a lot longer than 18 years next time.
The last thing Gordon Brown wants to do is take the poor out of taxation. That's not how the client state works. Nanny knows best; she takes all your money and then hand it out as she sees fit. Remember: she knows best.
Posted by Chas | 03.05.08, 16:19 GMT
Ian Gibson's cliché ridden article shows exactly why Labour lost so very very badly.
Say goodbye Ian, you are on your way OUT
Posted by matt severn | 03.05.08, 12:09 GMT
In our household I earn under £12000 a year as a care worker,my wife (a retired teacher) eans less than that and my mother in law,who is 86 and lives with us,is also on a low income .All of us would/will suffer if a tax band is increased-three life-long labour voters,now no longer voting because even the idea of hurting the low paid should never have been considered ,let alone made economic policy,by a labour govenment.Now the May elections are over we are promised that the govenment will listern to us-but only because their own jobs are at risk. New Labour are the new nasty party.
Posted by J.H.Smith | 03.05.08, 08:47 GMT
I aways agree with every single word that the very gifted Dr. Gibson writes. An excellent labour MP. Wot a shame his leader does not take more notice of what true labour people are saying. Mr Brown wanted the job for years - so now get on with it.
Posted by chris porter | 03.05.08, 08:28 GMT
Gordon Brown isn't a leader, he's autocratic and a control freak and that's no way to run a team. To top it all he says he's for the ordinary person and then he squeezes them.
It was inevitable that he would get trounced because people can't warm to him and Labour now have a real problem. If the party throw him out there will be a split-if they keep him in they will lose
Posted by D.Tonchin | 03.05.08, 07:08 GMT