Commentators

Partly Sunny with Showers 5° London Hi 5°C / Lo 2°C

Editor-At-Large: Women have brains as well as babies, and they're going to waste

There is little more job equality than 30 years ago, and the number of female executives is declining. What went wrong?

Janet Street-Porter
Sunday, 7 September 2008

As a schoolgirl, I was desperate to have a successful career. Young women today are riveted by Kerry Katona and Katie Price and the lavish rewards that surround their every move. They want fame, cash, kids and limited responsibility outside the home – and who can blame them?

There's a lack of female role models who don't have big breasts or telly shows as their main source of income. The Government talks of equality, but fails to put policies into reality. The big initiative for working women – maternity pay for nine months and the chance to take up to a year off work with a new baby – has had a detrimental effect on the number of females in executive jobs.

Discrimination against women who say that they plan to have a family might be subtle, but it exists in spades. When it comes to true equality in the workplace, depressingly little has changed since female-phobic Ted Heath was running things more than 30 years ago. At the current rate it's going to take 55 years for equality at the top of the legal profession and 73 years for there to be as many women as men on the boards of FTSE 100 companies.

A new report shows that, far from chipping away at the glass ceiling, and in spite of consistently doing better than boys academically, the number of women in top jobs is declining.

I don't buy the crap about women "choosing" to stay at home and bring up the kids – do you really think that wiping up baby sick and choosing what colour toilet rolls to buy is more rewarding than running a successful business? Only for some – most brainy women like power, just like men do. Just because they've got a womb doesn't mean they choose to amputate their career aspirations – and yet these figures prove that many women opt for second-rate jobs that don't stretch their capabilities because they can't face the struggle in a working environment run by macho men. Women are the single biggest resource this country fails to utilise. Why?

The answer lies at the heart of government itself. If you want the perfect example of an organisation run along antediluvian male lines, look at Parliament. Silly uniforms, meaningless committee meetings, pompous titles and a standard of debate reminiscent of Tom Brown's Schooldays.

In spite of feeble attempts to reform the hours the House sits, becoming an MP has about as much female appeal as snogging Lembit Opik: that is, zero. It will take 200 years to achieve equality in Parliament at this rate, and we rank 70th in the world. In the rest of Europe, it's so different – more than half the Spanish cabinet is female, as is a sizeable chunk of Berlusconi's in Italy – both societies that we regard as macho. President Sarkozy has appointed women to a whole raft of high-profile jobs – including the Justice Minister Rachida Dati. Ms Dati – the first Muslim woman in a cabinet job in France – refused to name the father of the child she is expecting last week. The Spanish Defence Minister managed to do her job while pregnant, not a situation likely to be repeated over here.

The irony is that the current economic woes – high fuel costs and food prices that have risen 10 per cent in the past year – are problems that smart women can solve standing on their heads. We run family budgets, we know how to scrimp and make cash go further. If half the Cabinet had been female, including our Chancellor of the Exchequer, I doubt the current recession would be turning into a catastrophe.

Redheads have more fun. I should know

I've always hated my natural hair colour – boring beige – swapping it for electric burgundy several decades ago. My trademark burgundy comes straight from a bottle and has an unfortunate tendency to turn common orange in bright sun – luckily that has not been a problem this summer.

Popular myth dictates that redheads are supposed to be stroppy, but my choice of hair colour has not done my telly career any harm. High profile redheads in the fickle world of fashion aren't too numerous – there's gorgeous Karen Elson, who this month was only the seventh to feature on the cover of British 'Vogue', and Lily Cole is another. Fellow supermodel Linda Evangelista has been an on-and-off redhead, and Marcia Cross remains a huge hit as all-controlling Bree in the new series of 'Desperate Housewives'.

My favourite redhead, who exhibits all the individuality and fearlessness of Queen Elizabeth I, the original Titian-haired power female, is Tilda Swinton. Vivienne Westwood's demented, dyed ginger locks aren't that regal but remain in keeping with her wayward image. 'Gingerfest', an exhibition celebrating redheads, has just opened in Wolverhampton, with the photographer David Rann talking of "victimisation". Utter bilge.

Hockey mom vs private mum

Whatever the pluses and minuses of the vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin might be, can someone talk me through the morality of using your entire family as part of your pitch for the job of running a country?

The Palin family looked like the line-up for a new reality show after hockey mom's big speech last week. The unfortunately-named Bristol was grimly clutching the hand of the redneck who got her pregnant – what kind of message does that send out to young voters? And Sarah clutching her Downs Syndrome baby like a mascot just made my stomach turn.

Whatever Gordon Brown's shortcomings, I applaud the decision he and his wife Sarah have made to keep their two sons out of the bear-pit of modern politics.

DJs and booze are a lousy cocktail

Pompous former DJ Andy Kershaw whingeing about his self-styled year of hell (including a spell in jail for harassment) smacks of maudlin self-pity.

Fact – he was, and may still be, a man known for his love of drink who cheated on the mother of his two children. It's telling that his ex-wife is too dignified to tell her side of the story, putting the welfare and privacy of their kids first.

Meanwhile, the BBC denies that radio presenters such as Chris Moyles "celebrate" excessive boozing on air – in one exchange he urged chef Gordon Ramsay to drink more than he wanted. Recent government-funded research indicates that there's a worrying amount of chat about getting slaughtered on commercial stations and the BBC.

Looking at Chris Moyles, I'd say that overeating might be more of a problem. With several chins, he's hardly a role model for a healthy diet.

To have your say on this or any other issue visit www.independent.co.uk/IoSblogs

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

38 Comments

I don't think i uttered the word "victimisation" when referring to my exhibition of redheads (of all shades), but I've certainly heard many tales of bullying and abuse, both from my models and people who've contacted me since. I'd be happy to forward these on if anyone's interested.

David Rann
"Melanocortin-1" (alias "Gingerfest") Photographer

Posted by David Rann | 08.09.08, 11:19 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Joe spottter says: 'there are all sorts of people'. I second that. But I think there must be some acknowledgement that men and women are NOT equal in aptitude for various jobs.

I (as a man) am not the aggressive macho type of man who wants to work in the city - for this reason many women will see me as a wimp. Many women are not the same, so women like that will see them as deficient. This is all nonsense. There may well be innate tendencies in men and women but social class and other reasons play a big role too - though biological instinct is supreme and no problem there.

Agree with miss amarlyiss - for example, i am a great cook and my sister is awful. Women are very awful managers (my gfriend and sister say). Women beware women?

I agree with Andrea but am unable to express myself so well and reasonably. Best of, with your daughters - they sound very sound young women withouth the issues expressed in this article.

Posted by Sexism Spotter | 07.09.08, 19:26 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

One answer: women's choice. God forbid the feminists ascribe women any agency or decision-making powers.

Posted by PJ | 07.09.08, 18:24 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

The hockey mom business is just the part and parcel of the nauseating spectacle of American politics. Incidentally, according to some in the know, Cindy McCain's outfit cost in the region of $300,000 - and she was supposed to be appealing to your average small-town American. The whole thing is utterly dreadful and, what with the lies and astounding hypocrisy, Americans should feel ashamed of themselves. Talk about a seriously sick society!

Posted by Tom Marx | 07.09.08, 16:51 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

It's a matter of what one is good at. I'm much better at domestic stuff. In the various jobs I've had, I'd rather have a male boss any time. Particularly in a female uniformed heirarchy, women are so horrible to one another, I could hardly bear it.

Men hit the roof, then forget about it. They can be positive and encouraging. Women bear a grudge; are resentful and cruel.

I think I'm better at home.

Posted by miss amaryllis | 07.09.08, 16:23 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Re women's iq

The facts are as follows( from the bell curve )

women are less represented in the top percentile of iq.there are also fewer females in the lowest percentile.

if we were to check the most intellectual professions there are fewer females.that is a fact.not many women at nasa.

Posted by virginia woolf | 07.09.08, 15:31 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

SexismSpotter - there are all sorts of people. Some are obsessed with work and others are not. If it's any consolation, you'll be interested to know that many of the so-called City high-flyers, obsessed with their work, coming crashing to earth when they retire. Of course, the money helps to alleviate the transition and to make their miserable lives just about tolerable. Haven't we recently witnessed the crashing and tragic descent of an apparently successful high-flyer in Shropshire?

Posted by Joe Stutter | 07.09.08, 14:08 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

well I think if JSP is the ultimate example of a career women then I reckon the best place for a women is at home looking after babies and doing the washing up.
have you noticed how grey this publication has become since JSP has taken the helm.She certainly isn't thinking of reporting any serious news,but more along the lines of getting a knighthood from captain america(cameron) when they get into power.

Posted by jim | 07.09.08, 13:53 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Janet, do you actually know any young women? My daughters, aged 19 and 21, certainly aren't in the least bit riveted by the likes of Kerry Katona and Katie Price. What a silly generalisation.

And please don't sneer at motherhood, simply because you don't want to do it yourself. Like some other posters on here, I gave up my career to care for my children and it was the best time of my life. Work is not a panacea for all. I was never bored by my children, though, like others, I have sat through some pretty boring management meetings and met some pretty mediocre people out in the world of 'work.'

I loved raising my children and I would do it all again, make the same decision again. Like others have said, teaching them to read, teaching them music, exploring the world with them and watching them grow. Don't under estimate it or knock it until you've tried it.

Now they're grown up and I run my own business. You can't have it all at once. Pace yourself.

Posted by Andrea | 07.09.08, 13:01 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Well said Sidewaysthinker, however, it is better to have experienced life at the top. Jetting around wearing Saville Row suits, having a big expense account and generally living the life of Riley is not for the faint hearted. In fact, it's better to have no heart at all. You can only enjoy that sort of life if you're blind and have no sense of justice. If I was in academia I'd undertake a study to test the hypothesis that our ruling elite are inclined to be psychopathic nutscases. Too bad I didn't sponsor such a study when I had the opportunity.

Posted by Joe Stutter | 07.09.08, 12:31 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

38 Comments

Columnist Comments

terence_blacker

Terence Blacker: The greasy gravy train of lobbyism

The idiocy and graft at work in the system barely merits a second glance.

dominic_lawson

Dominic Lawson: When 'life' should mean life.

Sometimes the public feel the perpetrator should not be released.

steve_richards

Steve Richards: Who is accountable for the police?

Why was Damian Green arrested with such spectacular insensitivity?