Commentators

Partly Sunny with Showers 5° London Hi 5°C / Lo 2°C

Janet Street-Porter: Knife crime's real perpetrators: parents

Thursday, 3 July 2008

Hundreds of young people marched through north London this week, urging their peers to shun street violence after 16-year-old Ben Kinsella was stabbed in the early hours of Sunday morning in King's Cross. Four young men have been arrested in connection with the murder.

Ben, the 17th teenager killed in London since the beginning of the year, is another victim in a familiar pattern of youth crime, but tragedies like this won't end overnight, much as Cherie Blair would like to see the streets flooded with police. The irony of a woman who has spent a decade of her life surrounded by police protection in the confines of Downing Street telling a Commons committee that she fears for her own children's safety when they are out in London, is astonishing.

We need to unpick the circumstances in which Ben Kinsella died. What was he doing in a pub at 2am? Attending a birthday party, apparently. By 1.30am, weren't the parents of these young people concerned about their whereabouts, given the number of teenage stabbings in north London?

These are uncomfortable questions, but they need to be asked. There's no point in continually moaning on about the behaviour of the young if no one is willing to step up and take some tough decisions about what constitutes good parenting.

And knife crime is not just a problem confined to the streets of London and so-called postcode gangs. Every Saturday night in Whitstable in Kent, groups of youngsters gather outside pubs and on the beach until the early hours of Sunday morning. Don't their parents care that they may be drinking or taking drugs, intimidating members of the public and causing criminal damage? Or are mum and dad too busy drinking themselves?

The other weekend in Whitstable, some gangs had an altercation, with the result that two of them got cut by knives and ended up being treated in hospital. The police figures for violent crimes in Kent have risen by an astonishing 27 per cent in the year between June 2006 and 2007. No amount of targets or initiative-speak can disguise the fact that the public – and not just Cherie Blair – rightly feel that violence is getting closer to home.

Let's congratulate Ben's friends for going out and demonstrating and attempting to get the message across to their peers that carrying a knife is wrong, but ultimately the responsibility for youth crime lies with parents. They need to impose stricter standards.

Barbara Wilding, the Chief of Police for South Wales, said recently that gang membership resulted from a lack of family role models, and that it was more important to address the social and economic causes of crime rather than impose more and more legislation targeting young people. Locking young people up is no answer – there are some 3,000 under-18s in custody at the moment and thousands more have been served with Asbos. A total of 37 children aged under 14 are currently in prison – a shocking statistic.

According to Ms Wilding, tribal loyalties have replaced family ties for many young people, who leave school with little or no qualifications. Being in a gang has become an acceptable "career" when there is no one at home encouraging you to do anything different.

The structure of a gang then takes over your life, replacing mum or dad, and you begin to see life in terms of a "war" for both respect and territory. Even Ben's mates wore T-shirts emblazoned with the slogan "Fallen Soldier". We should send useless parents back to school. It's the only answer.

Matt, Luke and a bit of a blender

The thrilling news that Bros are considering a reunion brings back happy memories, including an exciting night at Whitley Bay ice rink at the height of their fame. The boys were surrounded by screaming girls as they strutted their stuff.

Another time I was summoned to the studio at Miraval in the South of France where they were recording an album. Luke rather frighteningly drove his motorbike around the swimming pool while I took a dip, and Matt had all his food mashed up in a blender because he was too busy to eat it! Very rock'n'roll.

Matt and Luke Goss will be 40 this year, and have a lot less hair, but are still very glamorous. Go for it, lads!

* We're in the middle of the London Festival of Architecture, with a huge array of events that range from breakfast talks to a lavish banquet tomorrow night featuring buildings made of jelly.

What constitutes iconic architecture is rather subjective. If you're Prince Charles it tends to be something with Doric columns designed by Quinlan Terry rather than anything by our leading female architect Zaha Hadid, who receives most of her commissions from outside the UK.

Meanwhile, the BBC is spending millions refurbishing its newsroom in White City and parts of Broadcasting House, but it clearly didn't think anyone would mind if it flogged off Television Centre. Hang on! English Heritage are taking steps to get the 1960 building listed, but I can't think why.

Built in the shape of a doughnut, around an arid central concrete area, the offices all overlook each other, and the studios are past their sell-by date, no matter what historic programmes were recorded there. Let's pull it down and build something better.

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

31 Comments

Maxie, the issue is that our teenagers in our part of Spain are safe on the streets and not the mediteranean corruption and church power of old. Perhaps the village mentality you derided is one of the reasons why...everyone feels part on the community and not alienated. I think most Spaniards would be most insulted by your charge of their illiteracy...many of the younger generation have a rather good grasp of more than 2 languages as well as their regional dialect. Sadly the same cannot be said of English teens many of whom have problems with their mother tongue. I still believe that if Britain looked towards mainland Europe at the structure of society and not the US , it would beecome a safer place.

Posted by shelly | 07.07.08, 13:16 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I agree totally with Janet on the responsibility of parents. Children, particularly boys of this age, need boundaries & rules. Parents have stopped applying the rules because it's easier to turn a blind eye. They are ultimately responsible for what's going on.
It could take years to change the attitude of parents. I think some form of national service may be needed.

Posted by Simon Bell | 06.07.08, 08:15 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Typically stupid article from janet street porter. The reasons for the rise in knife crime are numerous-it reflects a general directionless in english society and sending 'useless parents back to school'is a pathetic immature and ludicrous comment from a supposedly intelligent woman (what an inane solution-what school exactly? eton) .the youths who commit knife crime and any other crime are perfectly aware of what they are doing; all humans have an inbuilt idea of what is right and wrong. the simple and transparent solution is to lock up perpetrators,knife carriers and whoever else until they get the message. whilst newspapers and media get great sales from endless discussions and hand wringing about what should be done, children are looking for leadership from adults and simple solutions.ben kinsella's family must have wished that his murderers were taken out of the equation a long time ago.

Posted by simon | 05.07.08, 20:31 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

at last! Janet Street Porter. Well said. This is exactly what I have been thinking. Parents, you CAN object to this society forcing your kids to grow up too soon, but it probably seems all too much hassle does it?

Little things - and consistency and courage are needed to implement this - can make a huge difference. Don't just accept their arguements that everyone else is doing it DON'T LET THEM

Little girls with fake tans, false nails and sleazy clothes - I am talking about 14 15 years olds here not just 11 and 12 year olds. They are still children. Tell them this and guide them properly. They'll thank you for it in the long run. If you can be bothered of course.

Posted by Julie | 05.07.08, 11:08 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Janet I love tv centre, can't we just call it some kind of brutalism? Aka the SBC.

Posted by HelenSparkles | 05.07.08, 00:10 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I have come to believe that weakened parental authority in broken families bears part of the blame. My 17 year old step daughter is out at all hours of the night. When my own younger daughter reaches this age, she will be subject to a much stricter curfew.

Why the rather glaring parental inconsistency? Because my step-daughter has too much power over her parents. If we try to lay down the law, she threatens to go back to live with her mother - and this would cause a huge amount of disruption. When she came to live with us, we had to move to a bigger house. If she left, we would no longer need or be able to afford said house. Hence, if she moves, we all must. So we are held hostage.

Although the circumstances of each patchwork family differs, the common thread is the weakening of parental authority due to divorce. Two parents who are unable or unwilling to work together are simply not effective, ultimately to the child's detriment.

Posted by Lucie | 04.07.08, 11:37 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

The Government has encouraged women to work, staying at home to look after children is now looked down upon, it is thought to be a waste of time. With this mindset young children are left at crèches with unloving carers. Children grow up without any parent present when coming home from school, this results in depression and poor performance in the classroom.

The child then learns that their anger can be taken out on others in the classroom and that teachers (the establishment) have no control over them and that discipline cannot be imposed on them.

In schools we teach them that they can act as they wish in the classroom, learn nothing but always be included (inclusion). Nothing can be imposed on parents (in most cases single parent mother) and if the local authority tries, the parents put the child into care.

The Government is to blame, - encouraging single parenting by an over generous nanny state, demeaning parenting over employment & no education or discipline in school.

Posted by Mark Jordan | 04.07.08, 11:13 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Shelly - you make the classic mistake of not comparing like with like.
Britain is an industrialised, post-industrial, large, city-based, north european country; Spain is essentially a small, village-based, unindustrialised (in the head) peasant society where large families and religion and the consequent corruption, illiteracy and conservative attitudes are all-embracing. They are different countries and cultures with different mentalities - but please do not peddle the lie that things ar better in mediterranean countries - having lived in two myself I know all about the corruption, the extremist politics, the church's power, the mafia, the village mentality, the EU handouts etc.
Not better or worse - just different.

Posted by Maxie | 04.07.08, 10:49 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

"ultimately the responsibility for youth crime lies with parents"

No, ultimately the responsibility lies with government / society in setting the moral boundaries, and appropriate deterrents and punishments...

this because it clearly is not true that every parent whose child commits a crime has been a 'bad' parent...

because it is a fact of life that 'bad' people are often parents and society should not, cannot, rely on people who don't care about others/society to set moral boundaries for their children...

and because it is out of parents' hands whether their child is charged by the police and whether their child is bailed (time and time again even for violent offences) by the courts.

Posted by Sue | 04.07.08, 02:45 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I also agree entirely that parents should be held responsible. It is staggering that so many young teenagers are wandering the streets at all times of day and night, often looking for and getting into trouble. There is also a culture in Britain today of rudeness, selfishness, intolerance and irrational anger which seems to escalate into these violent incidents. Parents - and all adults - are responsible to set an example of respect, tolerance and general good behaviour for children to follow. Parents should be responsible for the whereabouts and behaviour of their children

Posted by John | 03.07.08, 23:48 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

31 Comments

Columnist Comments

terence_blacker

Terence Blacker: The greasy gravy train of lobbyism

The idiocy and graft at work in the system barely merits a second glance.

dominic_lawson

Dominic Lawson: When 'life' should mean life.

Sometimes the public feel the perpetrator should not be released.

steve_richards

Steve Richards: Who is accountable for the police?

Why was Damian Green arrested with such spectacular insensitivity?