Commentators

Partly Sunny with Showers 5° London Hi 5°C / Lo 2°C

Joan Smith: 'Cars' is a four-letter word...

Our columnist cheers every time the cost of petrol goes up

Sunday, 25 May 2008

Almost 20 years ago, when a group of professional women defied Saudi law and drove through the streets of Riyadh, the word "driver" started being used as an insult in that part of the world. I have some sympathy with those women, but I think it's time we started using the word with a curl of the lip in this country. British drivers – not all of them, but the ones who think it's their inalienable right to use their cars as much as they like – are among the most antisocial people on earth. Worse, they have political clout: last week, in the middle of a major oil crisis, they demanded that the Government do something about it and Gordon Brown felt he had to comply. He duly rounded on the Opec oil cartel, but that won't stop calls for him to cancel rises in fuel duty scheduled for autumn. After Crewe, Labour MPs are so terrified of losing their seats that they may well persuade him to do it.

Welcome to 21st-century realpolitik, where the fact that overconsumption of oil is destroying the planet matters less than a noisy group of wannabe Jeremy Clarksons. Political leaders haven't worked out how to tell people the stark truth – that we can't carry on living like this – and survive the electoral consequences; in the US, Hillary Clinton and John McCain are calling for a summer "holiday" from fuel duty and wrecking any green credentials they ever had, even though American petrol is scandalously cheap. A few years ago, on a book tour of US cities, I was aghast when my publisher sent a stretch limo to pick me up at the airport; when I recovered the power of speech, I shouted across the chasm between myself and the driver and asked how many miles it did to the gallon. The answer was seven.

I'm not saying that people shouldn't own cars, especially in rural areas where public transport is inadequate. I am suggesting that our present level of car use is a luxury we can no longer afford, which is why I always give a quiet cheer when the cost of petrol and diesel rises. In residential areas two- and three-car families have become the norm, and I'm not talking about little runabouts like my Ford Ka; the same people who whinge about the price of petrol have often spent £40,000 or £50,000 on top-of-the range saloons and SUVs without stopping to think of the cost in road accidents and premature deaths from respiratory disease. How I long for politicians prepared to talk frankly about the damage caused by ever-increasing car ownership and face down the shrill demands of fuel-price protesters.

That isn't a description of the Prime Minister, and I don't think it applies to David Cameron. So we may have to rely on the law of supply and demand to save us from the tyranny of those drivers who don't seem to have grasped the underlying cause of the current crisis: that there isn't enough oil to go round. The good news is that a new survey by the AA found 64 per cent of respondents have made a "conscious decision to travel less by car" – and that was before the latest increases in the price of oil. The days of cheap petrol are over. Oil is an addiction, and all those Top Gear groupies had better get ready to go cold turkey.

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

22 Comments

It is not the world shortage of oil that is the main problem, it is the vast overpopulation of the earth. Until governments seriously address this problem, they might as well spit against the wind!

Posted by David Vinter | 27.05.08, 13:30 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

WOW! Elitist strike another blow for so called journalism. Cars are the cause of all the world ills? Just an excuse not to go after the real polluters; long hall trucks, construction machines, airliners, private jets/planes, army/navy machines (tanks, trucks, hummers, bombs, etc.). Of course all those are much less easily regulated so why bother lets hit the car buyers. Not all of whom can afford to buy a new vehicle with better fuel economy. Nor does everyone want to drive a characterless vehicle in their commute to and from wherever they live to wherever they work or go to school. Elitist like Smith believe everyone has her money and can afford to live where public transportation is readily available. From the NY perspective, I knew our Mayor's visit to London could come to no good. Now he wants to put together his own congestion pricing scheme to under the guise of helping the environment. When the real reason is so he can put more money into the many secret funds that exist in NYC government. Where is all the billions raised in the lotteries of NYC going? Where are all the current funds generated by the current tolls to enter NYC? Don't know about London, but all money generated by NYC government isn't going into upkeep of our roads nor our public transportation. Has there been improvements/expansion of London's public transportation generated by the massive tax scheme? Probably not, plus millionaires/billionaires like NYC's Mayor can afford to pay these taxes, but I can't as a full time student/part-time worker. Oh well, the roll of democratic government is to be by the people and for the people .. but which people? Only the rich and ultra rich, what about the rest of us?

Posted by Old Car Owner | 26.05.08, 20:55 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

It's funny that people are always quick to defend their rights when they're challenged yet will jump on the opportunity to take away the rights of others. I'm of the belief that I should consume as little natural resources as I can. I drive a compact, never speed, and while I live far from work because of school, I have every intention of shortening my commute in the long run. Those are my choices though and not anyone else's to make. In the US we're getting movements to ban cigarettes in bars. That sounds ridiculous to me and I don't smoke. Last century started with women in most countries not being able to vote and most people who weren't white and Christian were treated as second class citizens. I had though with things like the women's rights movement and the civil rights movement that we'd become a better society of human beings. Yet in the end we always trade one form of tyranny for another. People who feel that they are better fit to decide what's best for people. The German's have a word for your "quiet cheer." It's called schadenfreude and I'd look into it.

Posted by Compy | 26.05.08, 20:25 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I am living in China where if anything the obsession with cars is even greater than in the West (is this possible?) I work in a school and teachers, who I think should know better, drive from their apartments to their offices a distance of no more than 400 metres. When and how do we make these people understand the damage they are doing. I dispear

Posted by mike | 26.05.08, 04:11 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

She calls us selfish but that's because she lives in London and has buses, trains, The underground and taxis. We haven't.

No, it's not us who are selfish: it's stupid urbanites who think that the whole country is like London that show their self-centred ....... Oh! I can't be bothered! Just shut up and go away!

Posted by Ed Moran | 26.05.08, 03:06 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Not only do they bleat, but rabidly so, often betraying their incorrect reading of a short, simple article. With such 21st century kulaks in evidence, why simply blame feeble politicians ? Why not be still more rational and recognise honestly that there are far more intelligent ways of providing what is required, but directly at variance to capitalism?
To not do so is analagous to blaming the US for the world's ills whilst continuing to derive benefit from its actions... or to have been against the war in Iraq yet indifferent to Trident's replacement, or the tens of billions that the new fleet of air-refuelling aircraft will cost - the kinds of weapons without which saggressive wars could not be waged.
To take another aspect, a case may hold to transfer the ludicrous/disgusting attempts to criminalise "glorification" of "terrorism" [which, basically does not exist: more chance of winning the lottery, and 1000's more chance of dying from infection in an unclean hospital; unless it IS "tourism" that all the fuss is about, which would make more sense] to the pornographic propoganda of "Top GEar" - the audience is actually worse than the presenters, thus severely in need of help, not incitement.

Posted by delektus | 26.05.08, 02:04 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

you idiot

Posted by ian Bilbey | 25.05.08, 21:25 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Spot on Jane.
The animosity you attract proves your point about car lovers.
Car use is unavoidable, as many correspondents point out, but the car could be small and clean; it is quite astonishing that as a society we allow manufacturers to go on building wasteful and inefficient engines.
We need politicians who will say so.
Those who attack you and defend their 'right' to pollute with emissions remind me of the drivers who pull over in laybyes to throw their rubbish on the ground.

Posted by johan | 25.05.08, 18:34 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I live in a small rural town. From time to time, I must attend my 'local' hospital, only 22 miles away (!), for afternoon consultant appointments. It's fortunate that I own a car and can drive very well at present. The 'bus is the only viable alternative to using my car but I would have to use a car to get to the 'bus stop as walking is not possible due to my illness.

From here, there are two 'bus departures and returns every day. The first is around 9.30am and the second around 12.30pm. Unfortunately, the later of two return services leaves the hospital gate just 18 minutes after it arrives. I haven't yet had the courage to suggest to a consultant that they see me in either (a) the morning or (b) the very early afternoon in the tiny 10-minute window of opportunity the 'bus service provides. This appalling deficiency in public transport provision is government endorsed and explains the need for so many private cars being used for 'hospital service' purpose.

But hey, Joan Smith says I can do without my car 'cos she knows best.

Nuts to you Smithy. I shall continue to use my comfortable top-of-the-range gas-guzzling BMW for as long as I am able before I have to give in and rely on other generous car-owners ferrying me around. In fact, I am thinking of buying a smaller SECOND car to drive JUST FOR FUN!

But wait. A miracle might happen. NuLab could fulfil its promise of providing affordable, accessible public transport for all. Nah! They've wasted all my taxes on building the biggest pile of lies and hollow promises this century.

Posted by OC | 25.05.08, 17:14 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

What a stupid, spiteful piece of so-called journalism, does she get paid for this???????

Just consider the many (very very many) ordinary people ( you know the ones, the working peasants who pay the taxes) who do NOT drive 50 grand SUVs but still need to buy fuel to get to work, school, shops etc because there is NO VIABLE PUBLIC TRANSPORT.

Life does exist outside London, go there and see it then you just might get a grip of reality.

Posted by Steve | 25.05.08, 16:00 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

22 Comments

Columnist Comments

terence_blacker

Terence Blacker: The greasy gravy train of lobbyism

The idiocy and graft at work in the system barely merits a second glance.

dominic_lawson

Dominic Lawson: When 'life' should mean life.

Sometimes the public feel the perpetrator should not be released.

steve_richards

Steve Richards: Who is accountable for the police?

Why was Damian Green arrested with such spectacular insensitivity?